Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Starter
    Points: 16,704, Level: 39
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 546
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    642
    Points
    16,704
    Level
    39
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Thumbs down Seattle/Chicago/Hasselbeck/Seneca.

    All I heard this week was plenty of analysis on Grossman and whether or not he could come up big for the playoffs.The analysis should have been on Hasselbeck because I though Hasselbeck played terrible and should have been replaced with Seneca. Seattle deserved to lose. Also, Holmgren's play calling was pathetic.Two of worse playoff teams I've ever seen.



  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 334,809, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Grimes, IA
    Posts
    31,728
    Points
    334,809
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 72
    Given: 152

    Re: Seattle/Chicago/Hasselbeck/Seneca.

    Replaced with Seneca? lol

    Matt didn't have a great game - this much is for sure. Yet he's a better QB than Seneca...period.



  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 112,731, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    madcityCY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    5,675
    Points
    112,731
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 47
    Given: 107

    Re: Seattle/Chicago/Hasselbeck/Seneca.

    I thought Seneca played really well while Hasselbeck was hurt... comparable really if you look at Hasselbeck's whole season. I'd like to think Seneca, if given the opportunity to play regularly would be really good.



  4. #4
    Facebook Knows All
    Points: 273,988, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    cycloneworld's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,149
    Points
    273,988
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 152
    Given: 66

    Re: Seattle/Chicago/Hasselbeck/Seneca.

    Quote Originally Posted by acody View Post
    All I heard this week was plenty of analysis on Grossman and whether or not he could come up big for the playoffs.The analysis should have been on Hasselbeck because I though Hasselbeck played terrible and should have been replaced with Seneca. Seattle deserved to lose. Also, Holmgren's play calling was pathetic.Two of worse playoff teams I've ever seen.
    2 of the worst playoff teams? Seriously?

    What I saw was a good football game with two defenses who played pretty well.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 06:00 PM