Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 58
  1. #1
    Pro
    Points: 42,630, Level: 63
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 320
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    TheHelgo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,760
    Points
    42,630
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    than ISU when Anderson and McDermott took over at the same time - at least from an outside perspective. Just sayin....



  2. #2
    All-Star
    Points: 20,149, Level: 43
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 601
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    greatshu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Lawrence, KS
    Posts
    1,725
    Points
    20,149
    Level
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 46
    Given: 12

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    They didn't have to worry about LE drama. I am supporting McDermott regardless. If it takes 5 years to rebuild a program, so be it. I have always been a Cyclone, and always will be.



  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 86,475, Level: 91
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 975
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    BigBake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    U'dale
    Posts
    5,575
    Points
    86,475
    Level
    91
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 54

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    Quote Originally Posted by TheHelgo View Post
    than ISU when Anderson and McDermott took over at the same time - at least from an outside perspective. Just sayin....
    It's a valid point...but next guy is right about the LE drama...the Morgan drama...etc. But yes, it is frustrating to see other programs get going quicker.


    Fanatic #25

  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 433,179, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    23,879
    Points
    433,179
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 155
    Given: 24

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    Imagine that...another thread ******** about McDermott



  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 86,475, Level: 91
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 975
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    BigBake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    U'dale
    Posts
    5,575
    Points
    86,475
    Level
    91
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 54

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    Quote Originally Posted by IcSyU View Post
    Imagine that...another thread ******** about McDermott
    We start winning and these go away...well probably not. Who am I kidding.


    Fanatic #25

  6. #6
    All-Star
    Points: 16,424, Level: 38
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 26
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,086
    Points
    16,424
    Level
    38
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 0

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    Mizzou didn't have the transfer problem you guys did. Remember Missouri is probably the most experienced team in the conference.



  7. #7
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 82,615, Level: 89
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 1,135
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CycloneWanderer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,170
    Points
    82,615
    Level
    89
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 48
    Given: 9

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    If you want to compare, we did beat Mizzou at Mizzou during both coach's first year. After that the defections hit us harder so we are both where we would expect. People need to start thinking before making these threads. This is getting ridiculous.




    ***King of Diplomacy***

  8. #8
    Legend
    Points: 145,591, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    cybsball20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    12,716
    Points
    145,591
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 181
    Given: 34

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    Quote Originally Posted by trajanJ View Post
    Mizzou didn't have the transfer problem you guys did. Remember Missouri is probably the most experienced team in the conference.
    Yes, they did... They just had alot of players transfer IN...



    Follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/MarkHanrahan20

    Check out my blog
    http://markhanrahan.com

    and tune into "Extra Innings" Thursdays at 6pm on 1460kxno

  9. #9
    Pro
    Points: 38,878, Level: 60
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 172
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    dinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    3,395
    Points
    38,878
    Level
    60
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 54

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    Quote Originally Posted by greatshu View Post
    They didn't have to worry about LE drama. I am supporting McDermott regardless. If it takes 5 years to rebuild a program, so be it. I have always been a Cyclone, and always will be.
    The "LE drama" was well over when Greg took the job. He had a little Wayne garbage to deal with. But no more than Mizzou had remaining from Snyder.


    Husker Hater

  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 42,630, Level: 63
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 320
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    TheHelgo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Posts
    2,760
    Points
    42,630
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    A. The LE fiasco was well over with when McD took over
    B. Mizzou had just as much issues with the Snyder debacle - considering they were on probation.
    D. Transfers were/are more of a problem at ISU than Mizzou - but they have had all kinds of Juco issues that have caused players to leave (i.e Stephon Hannah, William Butterfield - just to name 2)
    C. If you don't like McD threads - don't read them. I didn't start this to flame McD. I started it to illustrate that Anderson has been able to overcome similar issues as McD faster. Now, maybe McD's style takes more time to implement - that is fine. I am still a McD supporter, but am concerned when I see similar situations rectified reasonably quick while we continue to languish in the cellar of the Big XII.



  11. #11
    Legend
    Points: 179,855, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Aclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Des Moines, Ia.
    Posts
    12,817
    Points
    179,855
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 161
    Given: 607

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    You want to know the biggest difference between Missouri and ISU right now? Demarre Carroll is Mike Andersona's nephew, and had used his redshirt in transfering to get to Missouri. Wesley Johnson was not Greg McDermott's nephew, and had a transfer available. Not the only difference, but the biggest one reflected in the W-L column this year.




    Paul Rhoads' players never quit.
    (They just disappear offseason)


  12. #12
    Pro
    Points: 47,774, Level: 67
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 576
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    StLouisClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    2,708
    Points
    47,774
    Level
    67
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    As long as everyone returns, I think ISU next year will look a lot like Mizzou this year. There always seems to be one conference team that surprises everyone. I also think Mizzou takes a big step back next year with the graduation of Carroll, Lyons and Lawrence.



  13. #13
    Pro
    Points: 38,878, Level: 60
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 172
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    dinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    3,395
    Points
    38,878
    Level
    60
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 54

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    Quote Originally Posted by TheHelgo View Post
    A. The LE fiasco was well over with when McD took over
    B. Mizzou had just as much issues with the Snyder debacle - considering they were on probation.
    D. Transfers were/are more of a problem at ISU than Mizzou - but they have had all kinds of Juco issues that have caused players to leave (i.e Stephon Hannah, William Butterfield - just to name 2)
    C. If you don't like McD threads - don't read them. I didn't start this to flame McD. I started it to illustrate that Anderson has been able to overcome similar issues as McD faster. Now, maybe McD's style takes more time to implement - that is fine. I am still a McD supporter, but am concerned when I see similar situations rectified reasonably quick while we continue to languish in the cellar of the Big XII.
    i am concerned that nebraska is starting to play some decent ball with nobodies on their team. what are we in for when doc starts landing some recruits taller than 5'6"? this is one school that should never win another sporting event forever in my opinion...but now basketball is winning.


    Husker Hater

  14. #14
    All-Star
    Points: 16,424, Level: 38
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 26
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,086
    Points
    16,424
    Level
    38
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 0

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    Hannah was a senior who played half the season before he was kicked off. Butterfield was a senior also. You can't compare that with Iowa State's transfers. Missouri has upperclassmen that are making a difference. Give it a couple of years and then compare it.



  15. #15
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 94,744, Level: 95
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 306
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    kg-cyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,116
    Points
    94,744
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Mizzou didn't have much more to work with

    [quote=StLouisClone;890016]As long as everyone returns, I think ISU next year will look a lot like Mizzou this year. There always seems to be one conference team that surprises everyone. I also think Mizzou takes a big step back next year with the graduation of Carroll, Lyons and Lawrence.[/quote]

    Exactly...Not as complicated as some are making it out to be.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: FOX
  • Iowa State vs. Baylor
  • September 27, 2014
  • 07:20 PM