Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 13,952, Level: 35
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 98
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    ScottyP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Johnston, IA via Ogden
    Posts
    345
    Points
    13,952
    Level
    35
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 6

    Have to get better play with less talent

    Everyone keeps on saying that we just don't have the talent to get the job done or not enough talent to run this defense. Unless Chizik starts pulling in amazing recruiting classes in the near future, which I doubt, we are many years away from being somewhat successful.

    It will come down to the excuse of we can't win because we don't have talent and we don't have talent because we can't win.

    If we want to turn this thing around we have to get more out of the talent we have. I am sorry for the rant its just I am tired of this lack of talent excuse.



  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 68,483, Level: 81
    Level completed: 26%, Points required for next Level: 1,267
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    2,959
    Points
    68,483
    Level
    81
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 288
    Given: 0

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottyP View Post
    Everyone keeps on saying that we just don't have the talent to get the job done or not enough talent to run this defense. Unless Chizik starts pulling in amazing recruiting classes in the near future, which I doubt, we are many years away from being somewhat successful.

    It will come down to the excuse of we can't win because we don't have talent and we don't have talent because we can't win.

    If we want to turn this thing around we have to get more out of the talent we have. I am sorry for the rant its just I am tired of this lack of talent excuse.
    Point to the teams in the top 25 that don't have talent or have talent on par with us.



  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 425,977, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    63,524
    Points
    425,977
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,239
    Given: 894

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    Like Minnesota and Tim Bewster?


    Last edited by Wesley; 10-26-2008 at 04:21 PM.
    Let my Fred's Posse Ride: Georges, 3sus Naz, Dustin, Bryce, Abdel, Monte, Matt, and Jameel.

  4. #4
    Starter
    Points: 12,631, Level: 33
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 19
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran10000 Experience Points
    Benny34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    772
    Points
    12,631
    Level
    33
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 10

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley View Post
    Like minnesota and Tim Bewster/
    Actually didn't Brewster put together a couple of the highest ranked recruiting classes during the last couple of years?



  5. #5
    Pro
    Points: 50,699, Level: 69
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 451
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Burnsville, MN
    Posts
    3,298
    Points
    50,699
    Level
    69
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 223
    Given: 47

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    Minnesota has a lot more talent than us. How they only won 1 game last year, no one knows. The year before they went 6-7, which was disappointing for the talent that they had, and they lost few players going into last year.



  6. #6
    Pro
    Points: 36,348, Level: 58
    Level completed: 75%, Points required for next Level: 302
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    isuforlife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,938
    Points
    36,348
    Level
    58
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 74
    Given: 365

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    do you ever get tried of reading headlines: Cyclone fall..........seems to be most sports here



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 63,250, Level: 77
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 1,600
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    CyCloned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Robins, Iowa
    Posts
    5,357
    Points
    63,250
    Level
    77
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 385
    Given: 172

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    [quote=ScottyP;691361]Everyone keeps on saying that we just don't have the talent to get the job done or not enough talent to run this defense.

    The main problem I have with this is that if we don't have the talent to run this defense, then they should be running another defense. What ever they are doing now on defense is not going to beat anyone. In the last 3 games the oppenent has had guys wide open all over the field. Even when ISU was rushing 3 and dropping 8 there were guys wide open. That is just crazy bad. The play of the safeties has been horrible. Better guys would help, but it is pretty clear that the current players don't know where to go or who to cover. The pass coverage by the LBers has been really bad too. Tightends have been have career days every week against ISU. Maybe the best solution is to simplify the defense, get out of the zones with the gapping holes in them, and go back to the complicated stuff after they can handle the easier stuff.



  8. #8
    Addict
    Points: 107,213, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Clonefan94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Schaumburg, IL
    Posts
    6,824
    Points
    107,213
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 597
    Given: 360

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    [quote=CyCloned;691399]
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottyP View Post
    Everyone keeps on saying that we just don't have the talent to get the job done or not enough talent to run this defense.

    The main problem I have with this is that if we don't have the talent to run this defense, then they should be running another defense. What ever they are doing now on defense is not going to beat anyone. In the last 3 games the oppenent has had guys wide open all over the field. Even when ISU was rushing 3 and dropping 8 there were guys wide open. That is just crazy bad. The play of the safeties has been horrible. Better guys would help, but it is pretty clear that the current players don't know where to go or who to cover. The pass coverage by the LBers has been really bad too. Tightends have been have career days every week against ISU. Maybe the best solution is to simplify the defense, get out of the zones with the gapping holes in them, and go back to the complicated stuff after they can handle the easier stuff.

    Exactly. Part of coaching is being able to find out what works for you. We are literally beating a dead horse with our Defensive schemes right now.



  9. #9
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 60,793, Level: 76
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 857
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Prone2Clone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,924
    Points
    60,793
    Level
    76
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 691
    Given: 282

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    How does Boise State do it?

    Rivals recruiting rankings since 2002 (including to-date 2008):
    #74, #101, #85, #64, #70, #68, #89

    AP Top 25 ranking since 2002 (including to-date 2008)
    #15, #16, #12, NR, #5, NR, #11

    No, they don't play in the Big 12 and the majority of their Ws come against the WAC, but they've certainly held their own against major conference opponents during this time when they have an opportunity to play them (5-8 against major conference teams during the same time span with wins over Oregon, Oregon State twice, Oklahoma, and of course, Iowa State).



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 352,036, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Grimes, IA
    Posts
    33,305
    Points
    352,036
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,072
    Given: 617

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    I wouldn't be opposed to a pre-game sacrifice. Some random animal, opposing team's mascot, Miles Brand...



  11. #11
    Pro
    Points: 68,483, Level: 81
    Level completed: 26%, Points required for next Level: 1,267
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Posts
    2,959
    Points
    68,483
    Level
    81
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 288
    Given: 0

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    Quote Originally Posted by Prone2Clone View Post
    How does Boise State do it?

    Rivals recruiting rankings since 2002 (including to-date 2008):
    #74, #101, #85, #64, #70, #68, #89

    AP Top 25 ranking since 2002 (including to-date 2008)
    #15, #16, #12, NR, #5, NR, #11

    No, they don't play in the Big 12 and the majority of their Ws come against the WAC, but they've certainly held their own against major conference opponents during this time when they have an opportunity to play them (5-8 against major conference teams during the same time span with wins over Oregon, Oregon State twice, Oklahoma, and of course, Iowa State).
    Consistency --- of coaching, of recruiting, of program, of scheme....



  12. #12
    Hall-Of-Famer Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,794
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Have to get better play with less talent

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottyP View Post
    If we want to turn this thing around we have to get more out of the talent we have. I am sorry for the rant its just I am tired of this lack of talent excuse.
    I am too, mostly because it's flat out not true.

    If you want to look at scout.com recruiting rankings for the 4-year class, here we are compared to teams that have beaten us during the Chizik era:

    School, recruiting class ranking in 2004, 2005, 2006, & 2007:

    ISU -- 57, 50, 59, 69
    UNLV -- 93, 85, 88, 93
    Kent State -- 116, 110, 113, 89
    Toledo -- 97, 102, 76, 79
    Baylor -- 89, 64, 55, 52
    UNI - Div II, not ranked

    Do we have the talent to compete with Texas, Oklahoma, Missouri, Kansas, etc.? No. But we have better talent than teams like UNLV, Kent State, Toledo, Baylor, and UNI, and we can't beat them either. So that "lack of talent" argument only goes so far.


    Gene Smith, 1993-2000. 7 years, 6 NCAA's, 1 bowl game. Revenue sports postseason participation 50%. Good.
    Bruce Vandevelde, 2000-20005. 5 years, 4 bowl games, 2 NCAA's, 2 NIT's. Postseason participation 80%. Better.
    Jamie Pollard, 2005-. 4 years. 1 bowl game, 0 NCAA's, 0 NIT's. Postseason participation: 13%. The next big step.

    My ignore list: splitidentity, tarheelhawk,superdorf, clones_jer. That is all.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • August 29, 2015
  • 06:00 PM