Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32
  1. #1
    Recruit Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Salem, NH
    Posts
    120
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    Not sure if anyone has already posted this or not but thought people would be interested to read this. I know I was!

    BCS officials to consider plus-one format - College football - MSNBC.com



  2. #2
    Starter
    Points: 16,341, Level: 38
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 109
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    l2alphmacchio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines
    Posts
    808
    Points
    16,341
    Level
    38
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7
    Given: 32

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    Of course the "little eleven" (Big Ten) doesn't like it. It conflicts with the best cable network ever...



  3. #3
    All-Star
    Points: 35,523, Level: 58
    Level completed: 7%, Points required for next Level: 1,127
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    IsUaClone2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    In front of the computer
    Posts
    1,756
    Points
    35,523
    Level
    58
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7
    Given: 9

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    I am truly sickened by the Big Ten's myopic position that they are entitled to the most money and the most exposure when they have been putting an poor-to-average product on the field/court. It sounds so much like the position that Notre Dame has taken for years.

    If you really want to make them squeal:

    1. Lessen the impact of the media polls on the BCS calculation in favor of the computer calculations.

    2. Put the bowls and tournaments in tiers and then make the payouts consistent for all teams in each tier.

    3. Place the teams -- without regard to conference affiliation -- in the tiers based on the modified BCS poll.


    Whether you think you can or think you can't;
    you are right. Henry Ford

  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 252,951, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    BryceC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    16,537
    Points
    252,951
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 81
    Given: 0

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    Big Ten commissioners Jim Delany and Pac-10 commissioner Tom Hansen have said the university presidents they work for are opposed to moving the BCS to a plus-one, in part because it could make the Rose Bowl less attractive.
    I didn't know it was possible to make the Rose Bowl less attractive after pitting a crappy Illinois team everybody knew would lose against USC.




  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 92,208, Level: 94
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 942
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    cytech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hiawatha, Iowa
    Posts
    6,187
    Points
    92,208
    Level
    94
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7
    Given: 6

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    Maybe the big 10 and the pac 10 can form their own football league, and take the rose bowl with them. That would solve alot of problems.



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 97,072, Level: 97
    Level completed: 2%, Points required for next Level: 1,978
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Clonefan94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Schaumburg, IL
    Posts
    5,929
    Points
    97,072
    Level
    97
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 96
    Given: 36

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    Quote Originally Posted by BryceC View Post
    I didn't know it was possible to make the Rose Bowl less attractive after pitting a crappy Illinois team everybody knew would lose against USC.
    That's exactly what I was thinking. Then again, how can the Big 10 be for a playoff system. Somehow, they end up in the game more-so than others probably do. Basically, they know this assures them of 2 teams in the BCS, without having a Championship game. Obviously, no matter how underserving their second place team is, they still get a nostalgic trip to the BCS by having the current system where the rose bowl is always played. A lot of that rides on my assumption that obviously, the team that wins the big 10 will be in the NC game, because we know they are so deserving of that after making it through that rigorous schedule.

    Anyways, I say we let them go back to the old way it was. Let them have their precious Big 10, Pac 10 matchup. The rest of us will work out a system without them.



  7. #7
    Recruit Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Salem, NH
    Posts
    120
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    Seems like there are a few complaints about the Big Ten and PAC-10 but honestly I was simply pleased to see that they are going to finally take a serious look at it, seems to me like a step in the right direction.



  8. #8
    Starter
    Points: 17,898, Level: 40
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 152
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    843
    Points
    17,898
    Level
    40
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 10
    Given: 1

    IMO This is a Bad Idea

    This solves nothing. There will still be schools/conferences that feel they have been slighted because they are outside the top 4 teams. Who would the top 4 teams have been this year? OSU, LSU, Georgia and USC? It would seem to me that schools like Oklahoma WVU or Va Tech would argue they should be the 4th team over Georgia or each other.

    IMO the solution is straight forward:

    1) Allow schools only 3 non-conference games if the conference has 10 or more members. I'd rather see ISU play Baylor than NDSU or UNI.

    2) Get rid of conference championship games. Each conference would establish their own rules for determining a regular season champion. The regular season champ in the ACC, Big East, SEC, Big 10, Big 12 & Pac 10 would get an automatic playoff berth. The 2 top ranked teams which are not conference champs would also get a playoff bid.

    3) The Friday/Saturday before Christmas would be round 1 at the higher seeds home:
    • Game 1 Fri - Ohio State vs. Kansas
    • Game 2 Sat - Georgia vs. West Virginia
    • Game 3 Sat - LSU vs. Va Tech
    • Game 4 Sat - USC vs OU
    3) The Saturday before New Years have round 1 winners play at the Orange, Rose or Sugar Bowl sites.

    4) The Friday after New Years the championship game is held at the location not used for the 2nd round.

    The bowls would continue as today. Teams in the 8 team playoff cannot play in a bowl game.



  9. #9
    Starter
    Points: 17,509, Level: 40
    Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 541
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    931
    Points
    17,509
    Level
    40
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: IMO This is a Bad Idea

    Quote Originally Posted by isucy86 View Post
    This solves nothing. There will still be schools/conferences that feel they have been slighted because they are outside the top 4 teams. Who would the top 4 teams have been this year? OSU, LSU, Georgia and USC? It would seem to me that schools like Oklahoma WVU or Va Tech would argue they should be the 4th team over Georgia or each other.

    IMO the solution is straight forward:

    1) Allow schools only 3 non-conference games if the conference has 10 or more members. I'd rather see ISU play Baylor than NDSU or UNI.

    2) Get rid of conference championship games. Each conference would establish their own rules for determining a regular season champion. The regular season champ in the ACC, Big East, SEC, Big 10, Big 12 & Pac 10 would get an automatic playoff berth. The 2 top ranked teams which are not conference champs would also get a playoff bid.

    3) The Friday/Saturday before Christmas would be round 1 at the higher seeds home:
    • Game 1 Fri - Ohio State vs. Kansas
    • Game 2 Sat - Georgia vs. West Virginia
    • Game 3 Sat - LSU vs. Va Tech
    • Game 4 Sat - USC vs OU
    3) The Saturday before New Years have round 1 winners play at the Orange, Rose or Sugar Bowl sites.

    4) The Friday after New Years the championship game is held at the location not used for the 2nd round.

    The bowls would continue as today. Teams in the 8 team playoff cannot play in a bowl game.

    Couldn't agree more ! This sure looks better then the present format.



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 391,300, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 85.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    57,102
    Points
    391,300
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 312
    Given: 258

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    Too good to be true. The bowls are all about money.


    CFH HMagic bball season next year.
    Let my Fred's Four Horsemen ride: Georges, Hogue, Nader, and McKay.

  11. #11
    Addict
    Points: 80,683, Level: 88
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 1,267
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    jumbopackage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,461
    Points
    80,683
    Level
    88
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20
    Given: 8

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    Quote Originally Posted by cytech View Post
    Maybe the big 10 and the pac 10 can form their own football league, and take the rose bowl with them. That would solve alot of problems.
    I believe something somewhat similar to this actually happened with TV in the mid/late 80s.

    Quote Originally Posted by isucy86 View Post
    This solves nothing. There will still be schools/conferences that feel they have been slighted because they are outside the top 4 teams. Who would the top 4 teams have been this year? OSU, LSU, Georgia and USC? It would seem to me that schools like Oklahoma WVU or Va Tech would argue they should be the 4th team over Georgia or each other.

    IMO the solution is straight forward:

    1) Allow schools only 3 non-conference games if the conference has 10 or more members. I'd rather see ISU play Baylor than NDSU or UNI.

    2) Get rid of conference championship games. Each conference would establish their own rules for determining a regular season champion. The regular season champ in the ACC, Big East, SEC, Big 10, Big 12 & Pac 10 would get an automatic playoff berth. The 2 top ranked teams which are not conference champs would also get a playoff bid.

    3) The Friday/Saturday before Christmas would be round 1 at the higher seeds home:
    • Game 1 Fri - Ohio State vs. Kansas
    • Game 2 Sat - Georgia vs. West Virginia
    • Game 3 Sat - LSU vs. Va Tech
    • Game 4 Sat - USC vs OU
    3) The Saturday before New Years have round 1 winners play at the Orange, Rose or Sugar Bowl sites.

    4) The Friday after New Years the championship game is held at the location not used for the 2nd round.

    The bowls would continue as today. Teams in the 8 team playoff cannot play in a bowl game.
    You just left the ONLY undefeated team during the regular season out of your playoff. It's entirely conceivable that Hawaii COULD have beaten, say, Missouri soundly, and finished the season undefeated, while you would possibly have a team that lost to Pitt the week before the playoff win the "championship".

    I don't see that as any less controversial.

    I like the idea of a +1 game, but I don't want a tournament bracket. Play out the bowl games, and then take the two top teams and put them in a championship game. It'd be tough this year, with Georgia, USC and LSU all staking a claim, but I think it gives teams like Utah, Hawaii, BYU etc. a fair shot at the national championship if they go undefeated, which is something that almost no playoff system will ever give them.

    Replace the BCS championship game with the Cotton Bowl to keep 5 BCS games, and then play a BCS championship game after all the BCS games have been played. You'll get a lot of good bowl games, and a chance for teams to make their case in those games for the NC game.



  12. #12
    Legend
    Points: 145,413, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    cybsball20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    12,704
    Points
    145,413
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 171
    Given: 31

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    A plus one format wouldn't have worked this year either. If they went plus one the final four would have been Ohio State, LSU, Virginia Tech and Oklahoma. Arguably the best two teams are still left out.



    Follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/MarkHanrahan20

    Check out my blog
    http://markhanrahan.com

    and tune into "Extra Innings" Thursdays at 6pm on 1460kxno

  13. #13
    Pro
    Points: 36,884, Level: 59
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 966
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    wonkadog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    3,348
    Points
    36,884
    Level
    59
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 70
    Given: 81

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    nm..............


    Last edited by wonkadog; 01-08-2008 at 03:52 PM. Reason: double post

  14. #14
    Pro
    Points: 36,884, Level: 59
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 966
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    wonkadog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    3,348
    Points
    36,884
    Level
    59
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 70
    Given: 81

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    It's ridiculous to argue that a "playoff system wouldn't solve anything either." Instead of arguing over who WON THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP we would be arguing over who the 8TH BEST TEAM IN THE COUNTRY IS. I'll take that trade-off any day of the week!!!



  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 80,683, Level: 88
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 1,267
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    jumbopackage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,461
    Points
    80,683
    Level
    88
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20
    Given: 8

    Re: BCS Officials to consider plus-one format

    Quote Originally Posted by wonkadog View Post
    It's ridiculous to argue that a "playoff system wouldn't solve anything either." Instead of arguing over who WON THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP we would be arguing over who the 8TH BEST TEAM IN THE COUNTRY IS. I'll take that trade-off any day of the week!!!
    You can only say that you had a legitimate championship if you say you had a legitimate field of all the contenders for that championship. Any playoff system I've seen doesn't include all the legitimate contenders, or at least enough of them that the n-1 team can't make the argument that they could have won the championship had they had a chance to.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 11:00 AM