Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 49
  1. #16
    Addict
    Points: 91,430, Level: 94
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 1,720
    Overall activity: 61.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    cyrocksmypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    6,407
    Points
    91,430
    Level
    94
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,198
    Given: 65

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by ISU42 View Post
    Why?
    Probably because it'll put the nail in the coffin of the game the way I enjoyed it. I've liked it less and less since all of the massive realignment stuff occurred.



  2. #17
    Addict
    Points: 109,719, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    5,355
    Points
    109,719
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 310
    Given: 286

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by kingcy View Post
    What about the competition will change?

    Money spent on a program doesn't make them a great program. There is a lot of money spent in some programs to get average ok results.

    If you spent Texas money at ISU on football would that make ISU mirror Texas in football. Hell no way more goes on in football than the money. If you put everything equal between Texas and ISU, given the choice what team would players chose to play for?
    Erik will have to correct me if I'm wrong on this, but I think his point is that it only gets worse for schools like ISU (and Iowa) if this goes to P5-only. Like you said (or at least implied), if all things are equal, kids will go to Texas over ISU. But all things aren't equal. ISU is already throwing money at a target they can't hit (to use Erik's phrase), but if the gap keeps getting wider, they're either going to hurt themselves by spending even more, or they'll just have to stop giving a **** and stop trying. Neither option is good, for the school or the fans.


    “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

    “With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan. ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011

    “He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

  3. #18
    Rookie
    Points: 3,607, Level: 17
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 243
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points3 months registered
    sadam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    376
    Points
    3,607
    Level
    17
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 67
    Given: 332

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    I think people are over reacting. I do miss the old big 12 too and wish we still played Colorado, Nebraska, and missouri primarily because they are mid west states that we share a lot of values and similarities with, not to mention borders with Missouri and Nebraska. But realignment will not ruin college sports imho it will be this pay to play crap. So freaking stupid



  4. #19
    Pro
    Points: 40,253, Level: 61
    Level completed: 93%, Points required for next Level: 97
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    3GenClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Windsor Heights
    Posts
    2,135
    Points
    40,253
    Level
    61
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 74
    Given: 130

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by cycophagus View Post

    So I am left to wonder, where is all this headed? What impact will it have on the future of the conference? And if the Big 5 makes the break from the FBS, to whom will they turn for leadership?
    Bowlsby had a great talk last year: introducing the concept of a "Division 4" without actually detailing any plans or leadership to explore this as a viable option. He made the Big 12 the flagship conference to drive for change without any real plan in place.

    My guess is another vague statement about change either at the NCAA or Division 4 level without detailing anything, but will generate speculation from major columnists until the season kicks-off.



  5. #20
    Legend
    Points: 167,719, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    HFCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    11,333
    Points
    167,719
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 880
    Given: 731

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by LivntheCyLife View Post
    I don't know why you think there's less competitive balance now. Things seem much more competitive to me now than the OU/Neb days in the Big 8. I think there's 4 or 5 teams with a chance to win the Big 12 this year.
    you ou could use Neb's peak and ISU's deepest valley as an example of when college football was probably the least balanced



  6. #21
    Legend
    Points: 167,719, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    HFCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    11,333
    Points
    167,719
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 880
    Given: 731

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by sadam View Post
    I think people are over reacting. I do miss the old big 12 too and wish we still played Colorado, Nebraska, and missouri primarily because they are mid west states that we share a lot of values and similarities with, not to mention borders with Missouri and Nebraska. But realignment will not ruin college sports imho it will be this pay to play crap. So freaking stupid
    if pay to play worked minor league baseball would be on tv as often as college hoops.

    A second tier of football being as popular as college football is 100% due to being linked with major universities. Pay to play advocates ignore that nobody would give a flying crap about sub-nfl play without university affiliation. There would be money to be had but nothing in the same galaxy as college football interest generates.



  7. #22
    Pro
    Points: 105,820, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,117
    Points
    105,820
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 255
    Given: 0

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by cyrocksmypants View Post
    Probably because it'll put the nail in the coffin of the game the way I enjoyed it. I've liked it less and less since all of the massive realignment stuff occurred.
    So you've always disliked college football?

    Conferences realigning is nothing new, I can't help but chuckle every time this gets pointed to as to why college football is just now not sitting well with a person. If realignment was the actual issue, shouldn't you have been fed up in the early 00's with the exodus out of the Big East? How about the SWC falling apart with their major names heading to the B12 a few years prior to that?

    College football is constantly changing and moving, always has, always will.



  8. #23
    Pro
    Points: 49,309, Level: 68
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 441
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    im4cyclones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    2,797
    Points
    49,309
    Level
    68
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 380
    Given: 339

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Some must have been living with their heads in the sand for quite a while. College football has been about the money for decades. What so you think prompted the creation of the B12 on the first place?

    And the rich get richer? Again, what sport have you been watching for the past 40 years? This is how it always has been. If you ever thought that ISU was going to raise up to be on par with the major football powers then you are fooling yourself. The ceiling of our program is being bowl eligible on a regular basis and occasionally getting 7-8 wins. That is still possible regardless of what the Power 5 do.



  9. #24
    Starter
    Points: 20,855, Level: 44
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 795
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsSocial
    BringBackJohnny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    805
    Points
    20,855
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 45
    Given: 20

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    College football is bland, scripted, and boring right now. Weak non conference schedules then padded conference schedules to help the big NAMES within the conference. The SEC is the worst offender.

    I echo the group that has been watching fewer games in recent years.


    Smoke um if you got um

  10. #25
    Legend
    Points: 167,719, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    HFCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    11,333
    Points
    167,719
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 880
    Given: 731

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by BringBackJohnny View Post
    College football is bland, scripted, and boring right now. Weak non conference schedules then padded conference schedules to help the big NAMES within the conference. The SEC is the worst offender.

    I echo the group that has been watching fewer games in recent years.
    at least a 4 team playoff replacing a two team runs against that trend. The top schools in a conference are more likely to lose to the bottom teams now than in the 80s and early 90s. To me that's when college football was truly the most predictable and unbalanced.



  11. #26
    Starter
    Points: 20,855, Level: 44
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 795
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsSocial
    BringBackJohnny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    805
    Points
    20,855
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 45
    Given: 20

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by HFCS View Post
    at least a 4 team playoff replacing a two team runs against that trend. The top schools in a conference are more likely to lose to the bottom teams now than in the 80s and early 90s. To me that's when college football was truly the most predictable and unbalanced.
    I am excited for the playoff system. It will not make me watch any more regular season football but I will be more in tune with the post season. I would have liked to see it go to 8 teams but 4 is a start. I hope strength of competition comes into account to improve scheduling.


    Smoke um if you got um

  12. #27
    Addict
    Points: 99,203, Level: 98
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 1,847
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Clonefan94's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Schaumburg, IL
    Posts
    6,074
    Points
    99,203
    Level
    98
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 159
    Given: 73

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by CYphyllis View Post
    So you've always disliked college football?

    Conferences realigning is nothing new, I can't help but chuckle every time this gets pointed to as to why college football is just now not sitting well with a person. If realignment was the actual issue, shouldn't you have been fed up in the early 00's with the exodus out of the Big East? How about the SWC falling apart with their major names heading to the B12 a few years prior to that?

    College football is constantly changing and moving, always has, always will.
    Yeah, wouldn't we still be part of the Missouri Valley conference?



  13. #28
    Rookie
    Points: 5,991, Level: 22
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 59
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    529
    Points
    5,991
    Level
    22
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 60
    Given: 64

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Some people just hate change. As in, change is always bad. It's not.



  14. #29
    Starter
    Points: 12,390, Level: 33
    Level completed: 63%, Points required for next Level: 260
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    cycloner29's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    769
    Points
    12,390
    Level
    33
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 41
    Given: 22

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Listening to Bowlsby now. Is it me or is he just boring as hell to listen to? Just monotone no emotion. Also to see the big 12 logo on the podium with the hotel name showing through. Just my take.



  15. #30
    Legend
    Points: 167,719, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    HFCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    11,333
    Points
    167,719
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 880
    Given: 731

    Re: Commish Bowlsby and What's Next for the "Big 5"

    Quote Originally Posted by BringBackJohnny View Post
    I am excited for the playoff system. It will not make me watch any more regular season football but I will be more in tune with the post season. I would have liked to see it go to 8 teams but 4 is a start. I hope strength of competition comes into account to improve scheduling.
    8 would be perfect, a second loss could still knock out a power conf team and one loss could knock out a mid or minor conf team, but it makes me worry about expanding beyond that. If nothing else the 4 team will soften the perception about the sec, it's the best league, but not deserving of 60% of all title chances.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: FS1
  • Iowa State @ Oklahoma State
  • October 4, 2014
  • 11:00 AM