Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Recruit
    Points: 7,206, Level: 25
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 344
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    116
    Points
    7,206
    Level
    25
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Is this the most talented ISU football roster of all time??? I count 4 offensive players(KO,Lenz,Hayworth Hicks, Bykowski) that are in, or have been affiliated with an NFL team, and I think Farniok will get some interest from NFL teams. On defense we have 5 pros: Knott, Klien, LJ, Reeves(signed with Jets), and Jake McDonough... I think George, and possibly Jansen Watsen will make a team too... Not to mention, we had one of the best punters in ISU history in Van Der Kamp. So, two debatable question here; 1) Is this the best football roster of all time, 2) If so, why did we only win 6 games in 2011?


    http://www.cyclones.com/pdf8/793095....B_OEM_ID=10700



  2. #2
    All-Star
    Points: 15,584, Level: 37
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 66
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    WastedTalent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    1,257
    Points
    15,584
    Level
    37
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 157
    Given: 0

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Quote Originally Posted by bdnichols2000 View Post
    2) If so, why did we only win 6 games?]
    CPR

    .....maybe



  3. #3
    Legend
    Points: 364,266, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 60.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    My Playhouse
    Posts
    12,217
    Points
    364,266
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,227
    Given: 637

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Our offense has never been used correctly under CPR because he isn't an offensive mind. That's why we only won 6. I'm sure with Mangenious, we would've won at least 1 more.


    Category 4 Boat Shoes Campus Rep
    PM for Discounts / Promo Codes

    Talk to BU4ISU for Category 5

  4. #4
    Pro
    Points: 37,632, Level: 59
    Level completed: 82%, Points required for next Level: 218
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    2,617
    Points
    37,632
    Level
    59
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 41
    Given: 9

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    I feel like we're being trolled, but its not a bad question.



  5. #5
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 62,527, Level: 77
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 723
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,101
    Points
    62,527
    Level
    77
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 124
    Given: 111

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Without looking, I'm guessing a few members of the 2000 squad were in the pros.



  6. #6
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 54,440, Level: 72
    Level completed: 26%, Points required for next Level: 1,110
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    4,094
    Points
    54,440
    Level
    72
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 556
    Given: 257

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Quarterback struggles. I think in 2011 it was more so having no solid QB than a dysfunctional offense.



  7. #7
    Legend
    Points: 336,277, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialOverdriveVeteran
    CyArob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    13,265
    Points
    336,277
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,106
    Given: 1,058

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Weren't most of those guys freshmen and sophomores then?



  8. #8
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 54,440, Level: 72
    Level completed: 26%, Points required for next Level: 1,110
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    4,094
    Points
    54,440
    Level
    72
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 556
    Given: 257

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Quote Originally Posted by CyArob View Post
    Weren't most of those guys freshmen and sophomores then?
    No. Of those listed George, Watson, and Van Der Kamp were all sophomores. The rest of those guys were upperclassmen.



  9. #9
    Legend
    Points: 336,277, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialOverdriveVeteran
    CyArob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    13,265
    Points
    336,277
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,106
    Given: 1,058

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Quote Originally Posted by Luth4Cy View Post
    No. Of those listed George, Watson, and Van Der Kamp were all sophomores. The rest of those guys were upperclassmen.
    Oh, that's right. For some reason I was thinking of the 2009-2010 team



  10. #10
    All-Star
    Points: 34,264, Level: 57
    Level completed: 2%, Points required for next Level: 1,186
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Sigmapolis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    1,001
    Points
    34,264
    Level
    57
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 164
    Given: 12

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    UNI +1 (last second Steele Jantz miracle)
    Iowa +3 (in OT)
    UConn +4 (in Hartford)
    Texas Tech +35
    Kansas +3 (seemed like more, but an ugly game all around)
    OSU +6 (in OT after a huge comeback)

    Texas -23
    Baylor -23
    Mizzou -35
    TAMU -16
    Oklahoma -20
    KSU -7
    Rutgers -14

    Honestly, we weren't "on the cusp" of anything that year. We had a really good defense, but our offense was just awful most of the time. When we lost, we lost big (with maybe the exception of the KSU game and the overall poor showing in the bowl game in New York), and we barely won 5/6 games to even go 6-6. It was *awesome* to see us win close, clutch games like that, but most of the teams above frankly kicked the snot out of us most of the time.

    I would have to think the Seneca teams, the Sage teams, and maybe even the 2005 team (the ultimate tease, they basically did the exact opposite of the above in winning big but losing really small and in ways you could have easily seen more "clutch" teams win, even to the point of 11-0) were definitely better than that one.



  11. #11
    Speechless
    Points: 216,767, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    27,455
    Points
    216,767
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 514
    Given: 49

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    IMO, this comes down to players having talent but all being at different stages in their player development. A sophomore that is a future pro three years later is far different from that sophomore year versus three years later. And that 2012 season we had inconsistent quarterbacking and our offense was inconsistent.

    IMO, that is one of the big things on defense this coming year. Could we be looking at some talent that needs much more developing, growth, and continued improvement.



  12. #12
    Starter
    Points: 18,315, Level: 41
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 635
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    889
    Points
    18,315
    Level
    41
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 21
    Given: 1

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    There is NFL experience and then there are NFL starters, which to me indicates high impact players at the college level. I think a better indicator of our talent level in a season, is the number of all Big 12 players that year.



  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 178,680, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    clonedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,058
    Points
    178,680
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 306
    Given: 0

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Quote Originally Posted by Luth4Cy View Post
    Quarterback struggles. I think in 2011 it was more so having no solid QB than a dysfunctional offense.
    Bingo!

    In both the NFL and in college, you rarely will go anywhere without a great QB. Kind of a coincidence that ISU's best teams were when we had NFL QB's like Sage Rosenfels and Seneca Wallace playing QB for us.

    That's what scares me a bit again about this upcoming year's offense too. I think we could be pretty darn good at every position, except QB is still a mystery. We desperately need either Rohach or Richardson to be better than they've been IMO.



  14. #14
    Rookie
    Points: 12,151, Level: 33
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 499
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    cycophagus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    412
    Points
    12,151
    Level
    33
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 59
    Given: 66

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    I think, yes, it was arguably the best ISU roster of all time. The most interesting comparison might be with Johnny Major's 1971-72 Liberty bowl team that, similarly, went 5-6-1 (NU, OU, and CU finished 1, 2, and 3 in the polls that year) and had a number of players that went pro.

    Several of the 2011-12 players mentioned are hanging around on rosters more than one year having been undrafted free agents. Historically, ISU players are undervalued on draft day due to the less than stellar achievements of the team, and the fact that we live in fly-over country. As UFAs, though, they do have the advantage of standing out versus their perceived peers for that reason.

    So why the apparent underachievement of the 20011-12 squad of finishing 6-7? The Steele Jantz injury at UConn was a factor. Remember, too, that KO played the entire season, as much as he managed to play, on a sprained ankle. And Bykowski (gotta mention our MN boy ...) was never on the field with KO at the same time. He played often, but only as KO's backup.

    But, in my mind, the tale of why the 2011-12 squad was 6-7 and not, say 9-4, is told by the final 2011-12 Jeff Sagarin ratings:
    http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2011/team/

    ISU finished #43 overall. Don't have a link, but I recall they would have started the season ranked in the 80s. By this measure, the teams achievement versus expectation was truly historic. Compare that to Iowa, who finished #45 and probably started in the 30s. (I'm sure it will not be lost on Lakesbison that NDSU finished #37 that year, about where I'm guessing they would have started out.)

    But I think the biggest factor for ISU in 2011-12 is that, according to Jeff Sagarin, they played the #2 overall Strength of Schedule (Iowa was #39, and NDSU #136). According to Phil Steele's retrospective rankings, ISU did in fact play the #1 SoS in the nation. Anytime you play a top 10 SoS, your team is going to be physically beaten up at the end of the year, and you have little chance of making it to a bowl. It also shows how absolutely miraculous the OSU win was that year, late in the season, with a freshman QB, and on ESPN in front of the entire CFB world. <-Cy->


    Last edited by cycophagus; 04-19-2014 at 12:55 PM.

  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 110,209, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    5,417
    Points
    110,209
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 334
    Given: 308

    Re: 2011-2012 FOOTBALL ROSTER

    Quote Originally Posted by Luth4Cy View Post
    Quarterback struggles. I think in 2011 it was more so having no solid QB than a dysfunctional offense.
    More like one hand washes the other. The offense was dysfunctional, but that was largely due to the QB situation.


    “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

    “With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan. ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011

    “He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: FS1
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 11:00 AM