Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 53
  1. #31
    Rookie
    Points: 4,480, Level: 19
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 170
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    412
    Points
    4,480
    Level
    19
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 45

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    I wouldn't hold my breath on the 3-4, but if they have the speed for it so be it. You need an absolute manimal at the nose guard in the 3-4 to take on the double teams all game, and I'm not sure we have it. Maybe Taiese? I have been wanting them to run some 3-3 stack because we have linebackers with speed and Db's that can ball hawk. Gives you more blitz and more ways to disguise coverage too.



  2. #32
    Speechless
    Points: 176,921, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hurdleisu24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    16,137
    Points
    176,921
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 4

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    We've run more of a 4-2-5 in the past but they call it a 4-3. Talking JB as the 3rd backer.

    In a 3-4 wouldn't it be more of a 3-3-5 with JB in there. If I recall correctly WVU plays a 3-3-5 (or at least did when they came in the Big 12). They were decent defensively in 2012 (3rd in Big 12 in total D). I don't care to look that much into it but I feel our size would be comparable to WVU in 2012.



  3. #33
    Walk On
    Points: 8,529, Level: 27
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 221
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    128
    Points
    8,529
    Level
    27
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Quote Originally Posted by CYCLNST8 View Post
    Meyers
    Cousin
    Morrissey

    Knott
    Harris
    Miller
    Brackens


    This configuration doesn't look too bad on paper. As to whether or not it works...
    That's putting a awful lot of responsibility on Cousin's shoulders. DT in 3-4 is one of the toughest positions in football. Cousin is a big guy, but using him in a 3-4 would entail having a guy with very little experience responsible for the two A gaps. Also, the guys you typically see playing that position are 30 pounds heavier than Cousin. Plus, who backs Cousin up? Garcia isn't nearly big enough to hold his own as a 3-4 DT.



  4. #34
    Rookie
    Points: 4,480, Level: 19
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 170
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    412
    Points
    4,480
    Level
    19
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 45

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Yes WVU did and does still run the 3-3 stack. I don't know if it's the only thing they run but I saw them run it against us several times last year and the year before. We have run a 4-3 but sometimes stem it down into almost a bear formation sort like of the Chicago bears. Could be considered a 4-2-5 with Brackens basically being a big DB.

    I like the idea of Peters making it on the field and playing a ball hawk, high energy, playmaker role. You can easily make a monster back for him in a 3-3 stack or even in a modified 3-4. Still think we are over looking the biggest factor and that is we don't really have a nose guard that can do what needs to be done in a 3 man front.



  5. #35
    All-Star
    Points: 23,970, Level: 47
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 580
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    mcblogerson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,502
    Points
    23,970
    Level
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 14

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    If they play 3-4, I'd think it would be in passing situations, or against primarily passing teams. We don't have the players for a traditional 3-4. It would be more like a 3-3-5, with Brackens as the hybrid LB/S.


    "You have great authority in your quotes, if you ascribe them to someone else."

    -Some Guy

  6. #36
    Pro
    Points: 48,100, Level: 67
    Level completed: 83%, Points required for next Level: 250
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    CYCLNST8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Urbandale
    Posts
    2,368
    Points
    48,100
    Level
    67
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 212
    Given: 301

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Quote Originally Posted by 04clone View Post
    That's putting a awful lot of responsibility on Cousin's shoulders. DT in 3-4 is one of the toughest positions in football. Cousin is a big guy, but using him in a 3-4 would entail having a guy with very little experience responsible for the two A gaps. Also, the guys you typically see playing that position are 30 pounds heavier than Cousin. Plus, who backs Cousin up? Garcia isn't nearly big enough to hold his own as a 3-4 DT.
    Yeah, Luth4Cy wanted to see a hypothetical. I have no idea. I just like the idea of less inexperienced DTs on the field. Lots of blitzing. Anything different considering the stars seem to be aligning against our interior D line.




  7. #37
    All-Star
    Points: 34,094, Level: 56
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 156
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CycloneVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Cedar Falls
    Posts
    1,336
    Points
    34,094
    Level
    56
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 563

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Quote Originally Posted by CloneinWDSM View Post
    Hoping the light turns on for Quan West. A large TE would be a huge threat especially in the red zone.
    Yea this would b very helpful, at least he is afforded another year to acclimate to being a tight end, but some redzone opportunities would be nice



  8. #38
    Legend
    Points: 280,569, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Doc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    11,909
    Points
    280,569
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 403
    Given: 702

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Quote Originally Posted by 04clone View Post
    That's putting a awful lot of responsibility on Cousin's shoulders. DT in 3-4 is one of the toughest positions in football. Cousin is a big guy, but using him in a 3-4 would entail having a guy with very little experience responsible for the two A gaps. Also, the guys you typically see playing that position are 30 pounds heavier than Cousin. Plus, who backs Cousin up? Garcia isn't nearly big enough to hold his own as a 3-4 DT.
    I don't think they would make Cousin cover two gaps. Teams like the 49ers and Texans play with a smaller NG and only ask the NG to cover one gap. I think the bigger problem would be moving DEs inside, although both Meyers are bigger than ISU's typically DEs. It sounds like Harris can be a beast against the run, but may take awhile to be ready in coverage.

    With the pass-happy B12 a 3-4 would be nice because you could drop 8 guys into coverage easier. Also, if guys like Harris or Seeley aren't ready to handle pass coverage yet in the fall, it would give them an opportunity to fill a role they make be better suited for at this point in their careers.



  9. #39
    Speechless
    Points: 355,820, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    18,897
    Points
    355,820
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 296
    Given: 39

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Quote Originally Posted by Doc View Post
    I'm kind of curious how this would work. I assume Meyers and Morrissey would stay at DE in this scheme rather than one of them playing Rush LB. Brackens sounds like he can pass rush, but I can't imagine him being that effective having to go against OL and TE every play as a Rush LB.

    Between Meeks, Harris, Seeley and Miller, they should be able to cover the MLB positions and play pretty well. If they bring in Meeks for a DE or DT they really wouldn't lose much size on the defensive side of the ball.
    Probably would have Madison swap for Brackens and add a true LBer. Also, there is nothing Brackens does better than Blitz.


    I'm on Twitter too: Tre4ISU

    Or so I have read.

  10. #40
    Addict
    Points: 124,288, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranRecommendation Second Class

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bondurant
    Posts
    7,556
    Points
    124,288
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 112
    Given: 41

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Quote Originally Posted by Tre4ISU View Post
    Probably would have Madison swap for Brackens and add a true LBer. Also, there is nothing Brackens does better than Blitz.
    I think he is pretty solid in pass coverage.



  11. #41
    Rookie
    Points: 4,480, Level: 19
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 170
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    412
    Points
    4,480
    Level
    19
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 45

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Ya, agree with both. Brackens is best used in open field for his speed.



  12. #42
    Speechless
    Points: 391,510, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    57,155
    Points
    391,510
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 316
    Given: 260

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Quote Originally Posted by mcblogerson View Post
    If they play 3-4, I'd think it would be in passing situations, or against primarily passing teams. We don't have the players for a traditional 3-4. It would be more like a 3-3-5, with Brackens as the hybrid LB/S.
    I agree. Then we can blitz from any of the linebacker positions.


    CFH HMagic bball season next year.
    Let my Fred's Four Horsemen ride: Georges, Hogue, Nader, and McKay.

  13. #43
    All-Star
    Points: 27,530, Level: 50
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 20
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    ahaselhu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Boone, IA
    Posts
    1,773
    Points
    27,530
    Level
    50
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 18

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    I am completely ignorant on the personnel requirements for a 3-4 defense, but looking around at a few other schools that run the 3-4, it looks like the starters that CYCLNST8 mentioned are all similar in size to the typical college player at their position. The OLBs may be a bit undersized. Backup NT and OLB look to be undersized underclassmen.



  14. #44
    Rookie
    Points: 4,480, Level: 19
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 170
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    412
    Points
    4,480
    Level
    19
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 45

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    Quote Originally Posted by ahaselhu View Post
    I am completely ignorant on the personnel requirements for a 3-4 defense, but looking around at a few other schools that run the 3-4, it looks like the starters that CYCLNST8 mentioned are all similar in size to the typical college player at their position. The OLBs may be a bit undersized. Backup NT and OLB look to be undersized underclassmen.
    It's all in how you look at it. You either have two monsters Nose tackles that can rotate and take the double teams, or you can use a smaller guy at the Nose and have two big 3 and 5 techs to make up for the size inside. Big middle backers and speed guys on the outside will offset the small interior personnel. I prefer to get the big monster nose guards and let the speedy backers pick the ball carriers off.



  15. #45
    Pro
    Points: 41,948, Level: 63
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 1,002
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    3,273
    Points
    41,948
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 189
    Given: 75

    Re: Post spring 2-deep projection

    I think a 3-3 could be effective, although when we've run it in the past we've seen mixed results. Against Missouri in 2010 it was effective in slowing down their passing game. Against them the next season they ran like crazy on us.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 11:00 AM