Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678
Results 106 to 110 of 110
  1. #106
    Speechless
    Points: 671,583, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    3TrueFans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    27,021
    Points
    671,583
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4,536
    Given: 503

    Re: Roger Goodell wants to end the PAT

    Quote Originally Posted by Rural View Post
    If you are going to move things for interest, I say make the extra point from the 45 and the two point from the 7 or 8.
    That would lower the 2 point success rate an awful lot I'd think.



  2. #107
    Walk On
    Points: 7,864, Level: 26
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 286
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    ElephantPie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    219
    Points
    7,864
    Level
    26
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 68
    Given: 64

    Re: Roger Goodell wants to end the PAT

    I don't recall ever seeing a fake extra point in the NFL so this applies more to college fball but the further back you move the extra point, the less likely a coach will try to fake it. Not that big of loss but a definite consequence. And maybe that's already been mentioned in the 8 pages of discussion.



  3. #108
    All-Star
    Points: 20,840, Level: 44
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 810
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Altoona
    Posts
    1,450
    Points
    20,840
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 257
    Given: 151

    Re: Roger Goodell wants to end the PAT

    Something should be done...points should never be automatic, and the current XP is about as close as it can get to that.



  4. #109
    Addict
    Points: 87,042, Level: 91
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 408
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    dualthreat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7,412
    Points
    87,042
    Level
    91
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 443
    Given: 58

    Re: Roger Goodell wants to end the PAT

    If they make these changes I wonder if we will see a higher value placed on kickers. Drafting them (higher), bigger contracts, whatever else.



  5. #110
    Legend
    Points: 127,984, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    11,350
    Points
    127,984
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 824
    Given: 1,653

    Re: Roger Goodell wants to end the PAT

    If the goal of changing the PAT rule is because extra-point kicks have become too routine or statistically irrelevant, just remove it completely.

    When a team scores a touchdown, it has the option to take the 7 points, or stay on 6 and go for 2 from the 2-yard-line, like it is now. (This is for the NFL only).

    It doesn't change the scoring system and won't affect stat-keeping (placekicker gets credit for XP on any 7-pointer; little difference from current scoring since almost nobody misses anyway). And strategy element remains the same — take the sure thing or go for 2. And choosing the 7 removes the need to trot the special teams onto the field for a formality.

    If the goal is to "make the PAT more exciting," I don't really think we need that. The 2-point conversion is intriguing mainly because it's infrequently used and almost always applied to late-game implications.


    Bass Lake Beacon: The best in local news satire

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.TV
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • September 5, 2015
  • 07:00 PM