Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 3,767, Level: 17
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 83
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered
    CyKings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Kansas City, KS
    Posts
    286
    Points
    3,767
    Level
    17
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12
    Given: 34

    Lunardi Bracketology

    Not sure if this has been shared yet, but Lunardi has us at a 5 seed in his latest bracketology... also means next to nothing this early, but it's nice to see.

    Bracketology - NCAA College Basketball Brackets and Predictions - ESPN
    +


    Let's make this Happen!

  2. #2
    Legend
    Points: 426,859, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    State43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    10,749
    Points
    426,859
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 186
    Given: 154

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    I would LOOOOOVE a rematch with UK. Not scared of this UK team unlike the one we played 2 years ago.



  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 109,113, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CysRage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    5,814
    Points
    109,113
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 249
    Given: 239

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    It was already posted but who's complaining! I love to see that we could potentially be a 5 seed and maybe even better!


    “I told you, I don’t care if you’re black or white. I don’t care if you’re rich or poor. I don’t care where you come from, whether it’s Texas, Florida, California, or right here in the state of Iowa, I don’t care about any of that… But what I did care about is moving forward from that day on, that we were one team." -Paul Rhoads

  4. #4
    Pro
    Points: 26,891, Level: 50
    Level completed: 35%, Points required for next Level: 659
    Overall activity: 99.7%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered25000 Experience Points
    CoKane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    2,700
    Points
    26,891
    Level
    50
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 336
    Given: 410

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Could an insider tell us if Iowa State is mentioned, and if so what it says about them here?

    Wisconsin Badgers own best early NCAA tournament résumé - College Basketball - ESPN



  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 102,133, Level: 99
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 917
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience Points1 year registeredSocial
    cmjh10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    7,101
    Points
    102,133
    Level
    99
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,234
    Given: 1,918

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by CoKane View Post
    Could an insider tell us if Iowa State is mentioned, and if so what it says about them here?

    Wisconsin Badgers own best early NCAA tournament résumé - College Basketball - ESPN
    Honorable mention


    Naz Long, the Cowboy Killer

  6. #6
    All-Star
    Points: 18,115, Level: 41
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 835
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    stormchaser2014's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    1,468
    Points
    18,115
    Level
    41
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 150
    Given: 149

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by CoKane View Post
    Could an insider tell us if Iowa State is mentioned, and if so what it says about them here?

    Wisconsin Badgers own best early NCAA tournament résumé - College Basketball - ESPN
    Badgers are so overrated, they play Prairie View A&M next, who is 2-8. Only good teams they've played have been Florida, Marquette, and UVA. They have only played 2 road games. Wouldn't be surprised if Iowa and Illinois beat them on their home floors


    You probably think I'm at a disadvantage, I promise you I'm not

  7. #7
    All-Star
    Points: 15,434, Level: 37
    Level completed: 73%, Points required for next Level: 216
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Dingus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    1,299
    Points
    15,434
    Level
    37
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 88
    Given: 28

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by stormchaser2014 View Post
    Badgers are so overrated, they play Prairie View A&M next, who is 2-8. Only good teams they've played have been Florida, Marquette, and UVA. They have only played 2 road games. Wouldn't be surprised if Iowa and Illinois beat them on their home floors
    Iowa will split with Wisc, both winning at home. Wisc is overrated but is still good and very tough to beat at home.



  8. #8
    Addict
    Points: 95,441, Level: 96
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 1,609
    Overall activity: 50.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    8,947
    Points
    95,441
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 179
    Given: 446

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Overall, minor quibble with a few placements in his bracket in the 1 to 3 seed range, no more than one line with most of it. I didn't analyze it much after that.

    Iowa State at a 5 seems about right this week, as a snapshot.

    As I mentioned in related threads, if ISU held steady with current resume, I foresee 4/5 scenario with a good change both teams are out of region (such as Spokane vs. UK, as in Lunardi's bracket).



  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 143,737, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CyFan61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    The Southeast
    Posts
    7,404
    Points
    143,737
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 458
    Given: 137

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by CyKings View Post
    Not sure if this has been shared yet, but Lunardi has us at a 5 seed in his latest bracketology... also means next to nothing this early, but it's nice to see.

    Bracketology - NCAA College Basketball Brackets and Predictions - ESPN
    +
    I know this is December, but let me drink some Kool-Aid and say why that bracket would be amazing.

    *Toledo in round one. Enough said.
    *Rematch with Kentucky with the Sweet 16 on the line. Tons of national attention in this game.
    *Syracuse and their zone defense against Fred's offense? This game would have 200 points scored in it. Let's say we pull it out.
    *Michigan State and Villanova would be (in my opinion) the weakest 2/3 pair out of any bracket.


    I'd give us a really good shot at Final Four if we got this draw somehow.

    And then... a rematch with Ohio State and Aaron Craft in Dallas? Winner to the national championship?

    We then proceed to square off against Iowa in the title game



  10. #10
    Legend
    Points: 171,601, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyguytillidie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    10,415
    Points
    171,601
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 75
    Given: 95

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by cmjh10 View Post
    Honorable mention
    How many teams were mentioned before ISU?



  11. #11
    Addict
    Points: 95,441, Level: 96
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 1,609
    Overall activity: 50.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    8,947
    Points
    95,441
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 179
    Given: 446

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by CyFan61 View Post
    I know this is December, but let me drink some Kool-Aid and say why that bracket would be amazing.

    *Toledo in round one. Enough said.
    *Rematch with Kentucky with the Sweet 16 on the line. Tons of national attention in this game.
    *Syracuse and their zone defense against Fred's offense? This game would have 200 points scored in it. Let's say we pull it out.
    *Michigan State and Villanova would be (in my opinion) the weakest 2/3 pair out of any bracket.


    I'd give us a really good shot at Final Four if we got this draw somehow.

    And then... a rematch with Ohio State and Aaron Craft in Dallas? Winner to the national championship?

    We then proceed to square off against Iowa in the title game
    If we're taking the bracket as it's presented, I'll play along. I'd meet you partway.

    *Mathcup w/ Kentucky would provide intrigue on second-week Thursday/Friday.

    *Disagree on the 2-3. I think the most vulnerable subregion for 2 & 3 is Wisconsin and Wichita State IF Iowa State happened to advance to Elite 8 as a 5 (and assuming all of these 2's and 3's reached the Sweet 16) — I think those are less-daunting draws for an underdog than UConn/Michigan State.

    *Fred system might be able to exploit Syracuse style — although we saw some evidence to the contrary when Iowa used a zone. Would we find just as many advantages vs. a team like Louisville in 1-5?

    *I see several places with potential bracket explosion (in various rounds). Which is fairly consistent with the actual tournament.



  12. #12
    All-Star
    Points: 19,981, Level: 43
    Level completed: 15%, Points required for next Level: 769
    Overall activity: 67.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Thomasrickj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    1,182
    Points
    19,981
    Level
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 184
    Given: 26

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    I wouldn't look too far into this bracketology. Kentucky shouldn't be a 4 seed. By the end of the season, I expect these arrogant, selfish, players from Kentucky to be an NIT team.



  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 66,202, Level: 79
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 248
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    erikbj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    hiawatha, ia
    Posts
    5,193
    Points
    66,202
    Level
    79
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 158
    Given: 44

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclones500 View Post
    Overall, minor quibble with a few placements in his bracket in the 1 to 3 seed range, no more than one line with most of it. I didn't analyze it much after that.

    Iowa State at a 5 seems about right this week, as a snapshot.

    As I mentioned in related threads, if ISU held steady with current resume, I foresee 4/5 scenario with a good change both teams are out of region (such as Spokane vs. UK, as in Lunardi's bracket).
    I think its a bit disrepectful, ISU is in first place in the toughest conference in the country. I think a 1 or 2 seed is justified.



  14. #14
    All-Star
    Points: 17,763, Level: 40
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 287
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsCreated Album picturesVeteran
    MIClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    1,579
    Points
    17,763
    Level
    40
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 13
    Given: 56

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by CyFan61 View Post
    I know this is December, but let me drink some Kool-Aid and say why that bracket would be amazing.

    *Toledo in round one. Enough said.
    *Rematch with Kentucky with the Sweet 16 on the line. Tons of national attention in this game.
    *Syracuse and their zone defense against Fred's offense? This game would have 200 points scored in it. Let's say we pull it out.
    *Michigan State and Villanova would be (in my opinion) the weakest 2/3 pair out of any bracket.


    I'd give us a really good shot at Final Four if we got this draw somehow.

    And then... a rematch with Ohio State and Aaron Craft in Dallas? Winner to the national championship?

    We then proceed to square off against Iowa in the title game
    No way Ohio State would make it out of that bracket.



  15. #15
    Pro
    Points: 31,989, Level: 55
    Level completed: 4%, Points required for next Level: 1,061
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran25000 Experience PointsSocial
    EYEoftheSTORM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ames, Iowa
    Posts
    2,346
    Points
    31,989
    Level
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 9

    Re: Lunardi Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Thomasrickj View Post
    I wouldn't look too far into this bracketology. Kentucky shouldn't be a 4 seed. By the end of the season, I expect these arrogant, selfish, players from Kentucky to be an NIT team.
    Man would I love that!!! and the subsequent head explosions from that pile of **** fan base in Lexington from 2 straight NIT appearances… All with the self proclaimed "college dream teams".

    I hope the teams like Kentucky, Kansas, UNC realize that you can have all the talented "boys" on your team to beat ****** teams, but mature men win the tough ones.




    I WAS THERE!!!!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Fox Sports 1
  • Iowa State vs. Kansas State
  • September 6, 2014
  • 11:00 AM