Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Pro
    Points: 51,210, Level: 70
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 1,340
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Mumbai1986's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    3,445
    Points
    51,210
    Level
    70
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 158
    Given: 83

    Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    How much of a problem do you expect the new hand checking rules to have on college basketball this season? Already fouls are being called at an incredible pace.

    From this yahoo article, it seems we might be in for a foul plagued season.

    Y! SPORTS

    "Seton Hall's 83-72 victory over Niagara lasted about 2 1/2 hours and produced an astonishing 73 personal fouls and 102 free throw attempts, both more than any game last season in either regulation or overtime."

    Not going to make college basketball watchable if 73 fouls are going to be called.

    "Referees have called an average of 42.29 personal fouls per game this season through Sunday night, about seven more per game than last season. About 19.5 percent of games have featured 50 or more personal fouls and seven have produced 60 or more, numbers that suggest the new rules have been enforced with particular zeal a handful of times by certain crews."



  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 945,008, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 60.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    CycloneErik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jamerica
    Posts
    64,755
    Points
    945,008
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,143
    Given: 6,941

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Until they adapt, things will be stop and go. Announcers will cry bloody murder over the slowness, like the ESPN ones have been doing in the WV-VaTech game.

    Then people will adapt, and it won't be a big deal.


    Kansas Must Be Destroyed

    Sic Semper Jayhawks




    http://rememberingdoria.wordpress.com/

  3. #3
    Brett Blume
    Points: 53,796, Level: 71
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 254
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    brentblum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,326
    Points
    53,796
    Level
    71
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 573
    Given: 399

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Seems to be an easy answer: Quit hand-checking.

    In all seriousness, teams will learn what they can and can't do. There will be more fouls called in November and December, but I have a feeling once conference play rolls around, everyone will know what the rules are and foul totals will digress down to "normal" levels. Teams are going to play a lot more zone to compensate.


    Twitter.com/brentblum

  4. #4
    All-Star
    Points: 30,804, Level: 53
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 46
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran25000 Experience Points
    Cyclones01's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    1,797
    Points
    30,804
    Level
    53
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 221
    Given: 479

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Fred has got to be licking his chops a bit at the thought of teams playing more zone against us



  5. #5
    All-Star
    Points: 30,804, Level: 53
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 46
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran25000 Experience Points
    Cyclones01's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    1,797
    Points
    30,804
    Level
    53
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 221
    Given: 479

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    It looks like six guys fouled out in that game. SIX! And there were six more with 4 fouls. That's ridiculous



  6. #6
    Speechless
    Points: 826,259, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Cyclonepride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    A pineapple under the sea
    Posts
    58,031
    Points
    826,259
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8,484
    Given: 3,772

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    I hope they all adjust, because the second half against Iowa two years ago was almost unwatchable due to the constant fouls.



  7. #7
    Starter
    Points: 26,371, Level: 49
    Level completed: 83%, Points required for next Level: 179
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    cyclonebillski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    949
    Points
    26,371
    Level
    49
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 372
    Given: 44

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Seems like it will benefit offensive teams. I like our chances against a team like Kansas if they cant hand check



  8. #8
    Legend
    Points: 276,556, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    klamath632's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    11,697
    Points
    276,556
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,456
    Given: 2,245

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Quote Originally Posted by brentblum View Post
    Seems to be an easy answer: Quit hand-checking.

    In all seriousness, teams will learn what they can and can't do. There will be more fouls called in November and December, but I have a feeling once conference play rolls around, everyone will know what the rules are and foul totals will digress down to "normal" levels. Teams are going to play a lot more zone to compensate.
    I completely agree. I've been really turned off by the amount of hand checking in college basketball the last few years. Every time a guy would drive into the lane, the defender would "hand-check" him (more like an outright shove) to stop him from going into the paint. It was ridiculous the amount of force that players were allowed to use to stop drives. I'm hoping the flow of the game will return this year finally.


    Quote Originally Posted by isuno1fan View Post
    An extra point is 20yds there Einstein

  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 104,341, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    isufbcurt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Newton
    Posts
    6,745
    Points
    104,341
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,091
    Given: 4,760

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Quote Originally Posted by brentblum View Post
    Seems to be an easy answer: Quit hand-checking.

    In all seriousness, teams will learn what they can and can't do. There will be more fouls called in November and December, but I have a feeling once conference play rolls around, everyone will know what the rules are and foul totals will digress down to "normal" levels. Teams are going to play a lot more zone to compensate.
    See I am the opposite, my easy answer is let them hand check. I like some physicality in basketball.



  10. #10
    Brett Blume
    Points: 53,796, Level: 71
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 254
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    brentblum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,326
    Points
    53,796
    Level
    71
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 573
    Given: 399

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Quote Originally Posted by isufbcurt View Post
    See I am the opposite, my easy answer is let them hand check. I like some physicality in basketball.
    You must be a football player!


    Twitter.com/brentblum

  11. #11
    All-Star
    Points: 39,901, Level: 61
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 449
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    247cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spring Hill, KS
    Posts
    1,163
    Points
    39,901
    Level
    61
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 107
    Given: 58

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    More whistles = more TV time for this guy:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	192142-0-600.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	66.4 KB 
ID:	23010



  12. #12
    Brett Blume
    Points: 53,796, Level: 71
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 254
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    brentblum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,326
    Points
    53,796
    Level
    71
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 573
    Given: 399

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Quote Originally Posted by 247cy View Post
    More whistles = more TV time for this guy:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	192142-0-600.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	66.4 KB 
ID:	23010
    Ed is retiring after this year. Expect a banner year from the man.


    Twitter.com/brentblum

  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 146,014, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    RayShimley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Stillwater, MN
    Posts
    6,145
    Points
    146,014
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 190
    Given: 36

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Quote Originally Posted by brentblum View Post
    Seems to be an easy answer: Quit hand-checking.

    In all seriousness, teams will learn what they can and can't do. There will be more fouls called in November and December, but I have a feeling once conference play rolls around, everyone will know what the rules are and foul totals will digress down to "normal" levels. Teams are going to play a lot more zone to compensate.
    This. You will see two types of teams this year. Those that are going to continue business as usual in hopes that the refs don't have the stomach to keep calling all these fouls and those that choose to adapt immediately and emphasize playing d without the hands. Seems like CFH will be in the latter category.




  14. #14
    All-Star
    Points: 39,901, Level: 61
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 449
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    247cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spring Hill, KS
    Posts
    1,163
    Points
    39,901
    Level
    61
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 107
    Given: 58

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclonebillski View Post
    Seems like it will benefit offensive teams. I like our chances against a team like Kansas if they cant hand check
    You seem to forget who you're dealing with. Hand check will not apply to blue-blood programs.



  15. #15
    Rookie
    Points: 8,268, Level: 27
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 482
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second Class5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    HoraceGrant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    357
    Points
    8,268
    Level
    27
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 79
    Given: 0

    Re: Referees: Hand Checking emphasis

    Quote Originally Posted by Mumbai1986 View Post
    How much of a problem do you expect the new hand checking rules to have on college basketball this season? Already fouls are being called at an incredible pace.

    From this yahoo article, it seems we might be in for a foul plagued season.

    Y! SPORTS

    "Seton Hall's 83-72 victory over Niagara lasted about 2 1/2 hours and produced an astonishing 73 personal fouls and 102 free throw attempts, both more than any game last season in either regulation or overtime."

    Not going to make college basketball watchable if 73 fouls are going to be called.

    "Referees have called an average of 42.29 personal fouls per game this season through Sunday night, about seven more per game than last season. About 19.5 percent of games have featured 50 or more personal fouls and seven have produced 60 or more, numbers that suggest the new rules have been enforced with particular zeal a handful of times by certain crews."
    If teams combine for 70 fouls in a game then both of those coaches need to take some practice time and dedicate it to teaching their players to move their feet. The rules are a great move for CBB, and the only teams that will truly struggle with them are teams that refuse to play straight up and continue to hack ballhandlers.


    Certainly there is no hunting like the hunting of man and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never really care for anything else thereafter.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: ESPNU
  • HOOPS: Iowa State @ Texas Tech
  • February 9, 2016
  • 08:00 PM