Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34
  1. #1
    Speechless
    Points: 352,746, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    18,485
    Points
    352,746
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 125
    Given: 9

    Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    So this has been a topic that has cooled down a little lately but we have heard about our youth, specifically on the offensive line. Well, I kind of just took it for granted that we were young because I saw what we were putting out there. Tonight, I came across a piece on a Michigan blog that compared the youth of their line to those in the top 25. I took the way they calculated "age" and applied it to each of our lineups. I'm sort of doing it off of memory and may have some guys switched here and there and I used the guys that started the games so that when Farniok was rotated in, he wasn't factored in. Here's the link to the original data that they compiled.

    Let's Try This Again!!! - Is Our O-Line Really That Young? | mgoblog

    Ok so here is what we have had.

    Lich-4.5
    Burton-1.5
    Farniok-3.5
    Lalk-2.5
    Gannon- 3.5
    Ave-3.1

    Dagel-2.5
    Burton-1.5
    Lalk-2.5
    Tuftee- 4.5
    Gannon-3.5
    Ave-2.9

    Dagel-2.5
    Burton- 1.5
    Loth- 3.5
    Omoile- 2.5
    Farniok-3.5
    Ave-2.7

    Right now
    Burton-1.5
    Dagel- 2.5
    Farniok-3.5
    Lalk- 2.5
    Omoile 2.5
    Ave-2.5

    Note that Dunning got significant time lately. He's a 1.5.

    Ok, so we broke 3 once at the beginning of the year and once you pull out Lich, that just isn't happening. There are 2 teams with lines equal to our current one, none of them that are younger. Those teams are LSU and Auburn. I'm guessing the guys they are getting are probably much closer to ready than the guys we recruit. I think that's a very important aspect. Guys like Dagel and Lalk were TEs who needed at the very least, 3 years to be ready to be very good linemen. IMO, Lalk, especially has been very good considering. I didn't do this with the intention of creating any sort of hope or anything like that. I did it because I wanted to quantify and compare our line to see if it was actually young relative to other teams. A better way to do this would be to sort by offense, however I don't have the time or patience to gather my own data so I just stuck with that. The one gripe that I have is that a RS Freshman and a So are given the same value. I'm not sure that's right but for the sake of comparing I left it alone. Obviously I didn't do every lineup but I think we get the idea. Let's just say everyone that had been recruited and stayed at ISU was healthy. I'm not talking about guys that got beat out, like Lich and Loth but if you add Tuftee and Dika to our line it gets significantly older. Comments?


    I'm on Twitter too: Tre4ISU

    Or so I have read.

  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 380,795, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    55,552
    Points
    380,795
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 144
    Given: 113

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    They will be older next year. Just interesting how the older guys were all injured.


    CFH HMagic bball season next year.
    Let my Fred's Four Horsemen ride: Georges, Hogue, Nader, and McKay.

  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 352,746, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    18,485
    Points
    352,746
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 125
    Given: 9

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley View Post
    They will be older next year. Just interesting how the older guys were all injured.
    I know how you meant this but it just made me chuckle.


    I'm on Twitter too: Tre4ISU

    Or so I have read.

  4. #4
    Rookie
    Points: 16,870, Level: 39
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 380
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    khardbored's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Crocker Township
    Posts
    548
    Points
    16,870
    Level
    39
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 14

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    Quote Originally Posted by Wesley View Post
    They will be older next year. Just interesting how the older guys were all injured.
    If you figure out a way to get younger as a year passes, you could be a very wealthy man!



  5. #5
    Legend
    Points: 405,198, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    State43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    10,367
    Points
    405,198
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 94
    Given: 60

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    That is pretty interesting. Not at all surprising either.


    Quote Originally Posted by AltHawk View Post
    Why would it? One bad game doesn't change a thing. Iowa will still be a darkhorse B1G championship contender, and Iowa State will be lucky to make the NIT.

    If you ask the basketball analysts outside the state of Iowa I think you would be surprised to hear their responses. Iowa was pegged as a preseason top 5 team by one ESPN analyst and is ranked in the vast, vast majority of preseason top 25 polls

  6. #6
    Pro
    Points: 58,315, Level: 74
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 235
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    PabloDiablo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    2,472
    Points
    58,315
    Level
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 22
    Given: 29

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    I know you weren't trying to pump sunshine, but I think it does bode well for the future that guys like Burton, Dunning and Omoile got some game time reps. Similar to '03 when that young OL cut its teeth in a rough season.

    I think Dagel and Lalk are ultimately just better players straight up right now than there older counterparts and that is a definite positive being that they will both continue to develop both physically and in technique over the offseason and have 2 full seasons left with relatively strong play.

    Add to that the potential of guys like Campos and Curtis as a nice pair of young tackles from last years class who most were pretty high on coming in.



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 213,778, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    JUKEBOX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7,021
    Points
    213,778
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 46
    Given: 0

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    So our starting line at 3.1 was older than 8 top 25 teams, but they still got worked by UNI?



  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 352,746, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    18,485
    Points
    352,746
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 125
    Given: 9

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    Oh, I just noticed UCLA is younger than ours has ever been.


    I'm on Twitter too: Tre4ISU

    Or so I have read.

  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 122,703, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranRecommendation Second Class

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bondurant
    Posts
    7,322
    Points
    122,703
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 10

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    You can have 5 of the best lineman in the country but if you dont have a quarterback, you cant score points. No longer can we blame the offense on inadequate receivers or tight ends, or running backs. This is the first year in a long time Iowa State receivers have ran wild in the secondary, but have repeated been over-thrown, under-thrown or thrown behind of, even an 8 yard pass last Saturday was thrown for 6 yards. The last two games the quarterbacks have had adequate time to throw and there were holes for the running backs to run through but we cant keep the defense honest because no one is afraid of our quarterbacks.



  10. #10
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 18,436, Level: 41
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 514
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    340
    Points
    18,436
    Level
    41
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4
    Given: 13

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    Age and experience are certainly important, but coaching and improving the current players is where I am concerned we don't do a good job.



  11. #11
    Legend
    Points: 405,198, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    State43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    10,367
    Points
    405,198
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 94
    Given: 60

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    Quote Originally Posted by JUKEBOX View Post
    So our starting line at 3.1 was older than 8 top 25 teams, but they still got worked by UNI?
    Nevermind our starting center got hurt on the 1st possession? And I am sure the talent level of players who can contribute early is equal as well.


    Quote Originally Posted by AltHawk View Post
    Why would it? One bad game doesn't change a thing. Iowa will still be a darkhorse B1G championship contender, and Iowa State will be lucky to make the NIT.

    If you ask the basketball analysts outside the state of Iowa I think you would be surprised to hear their responses. Iowa was pegged as a preseason top 5 team by one ESPN analyst and is ranked in the vast, vast majority of preseason top 25 polls

  12. #12
    Speechless
    Points: 380,795, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    55,552
    Points
    380,795
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 144
    Given: 113

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    Quote Originally Posted by JUKEBOX View Post
    So our starting line at 3.1 was older than 8 top 25 teams, but they still got worked by UNI?
    Abused.

    The next question will be if more experience will see to it if our qbs are better.


    CFH HMagic bball season next year.
    Let my Fred's Four Horsemen ride: Georges, Hogue, Nader, and McKay.

  13. #13
    Pro
    Points: 38,247, Level: 60
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 803
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    3,021
    Points
    38,247
    Level
    60
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 99
    Given: 28

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    Quote Originally Posted by JUKEBOX View Post
    So our starting line at 3.1 was older than 8 top 25 teams, but they still got worked by UNI?
    UNI was an anomaly. It shouldn't have happened and there is no logical explanation for it. I'd spend more time worrying about the last 3 or 4 games than the UNI game.



  14. #14
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 136,315, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    WhatchaGonnaDo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    4,596
    Points
    136,315
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 75
    Given: 62

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    I think quantifying age has something to do with counting the number of days since birth. Hope that helps.



  15. #15
    All-Star
    Points: 21,378, Level: 44
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 272
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    drednot57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Nevada, IA
    Posts
    1,580
    Points
    21,378
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 2

    Re: Quantifying the Age of our Offensive Line

    Quote Originally Posted by InAWord View Post
    Age and experience are certainly important, but coaching and improving the current players is where I am concerned we don't do a good job.
    This. We just have to wait and see for any improvement next year.


    P.J. Farmer rocks!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 06:00 PM