Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 46,650, Level: 66
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 300
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    tyler24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,236
    Points
    46,650
    Level
    66
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 184
    Given: 30

    Did we Improve from Week 1?

    I understand we may not win many games this year, but do you guys think we improved from the UNI game? If so, which positions?



  2. #2
    Addict
    Points: 55,013, Level: 72
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 537
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    atlantacyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Fontvieille Monaco
    Posts
    5,079
    Points
    55,013
    Level
    72
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 289
    Given: 90

    Re: Did we Improve from Week 1?

    Clearly improved on D. Better tackling I would say. O looked better at the end unless Iowa was already mentally picking up the trophy.



  3. #3
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 113,478, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranCreated Album pictures
    TXCyclones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    TX
    Posts
    4,297
    Points
    113,478
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,219
    Given: 692

    Re: Did we Improve from Week 1?

    How can we tell? UNI was a better team.


    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.

    Remember, you're unique. Just like everyone else.

    Praying I'm overwhelmingly shocked when bowl-season rolls around... I'll gladly change my user-name to TXCrowEater! - TXCyclone 12/15/15

  4. #4
    Legend
    Points: 243,518, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ottumwa
    Posts
    13,125
    Points
    243,518
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,445
    Given: 351

    Re: Did we Improve from Week 1?

    Quote Originally Posted by atlantacyclone View Post
    Clearly improved on D. Better tackling I would say. O looked better at the end unless Iowa was already mentally picking up the trophy.
    I think you know the answer to the bolded. You could clearly see a shift in defensive strategy after they went up 20 with seven minutes left. They went from playing tight with the receivers to playing 10 yards off and playing the safeties 20 yards deep. ISU is going to have to prove to teams that they are able to run the ball and/or throw the ball further than 10 yards down the field or it will be a miserable year to watch for you guys.

    Defensively I thought they tackled fairly well. Can't teach size and I imagine there will be many games where the cornerbacks are playing on an island because the safeties have to provide run support.



  5. #5
    Speechless
    Points: 458,964, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    69,836
    Points
    458,964
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,196
    Given: 1,950

    Re: Did we Improve from Week 1?

    Running was worse.
    Playcalling was worse.
    Offense enthusiasm was same.
    O line was worse.
    Linebackers were much better.
    Tackling was better.
    DE play was about the same.
    Irving, George, Knott, and Morrisey looked good.
    Watson had a fair game.
    Kirby can kick it up a notch.
    Arceo was very good. He made a tackle that ten others could not.


    Okay, why not throw downfield every fifth play, Mess? Are we scared of our own shadow?


    Let Prohm's Posse Ride: Georges, Georgios, 3sus, Hallice, Deonte, Abdel, Monte, Matt, and McKaT.

  6. #6
    Legend
    Points: 118,668, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUKyro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    10,803
    Points
    118,668
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 750
    Given: 1,805

    Re: Did we Improve from Week 1?

    Week 1: Just barely lost to an FCS school
    Week 2: BYE - so no sign of life from the O
    Week 3: Just barely lost to Iowa (close to an FCS school)

    I'm gonna call it a push



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 63,669, Level: 78
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 1,181
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    5,452
    Points
    63,669
    Level
    78
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,019
    Given: 589

    Re: Did we Improve from Week 1?

    Every position on defense played significantly better, IMO. On offense Bundrage showed some big play ability at the end and I though the pass blocking was better. Run blocking was poor, and for that reason I can't really blame the running backs for a lot since they rarely had holes to run through.

    So yes, I don think as a whole we were better than we were against UNI.



  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 366,417, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    21,532
    Points
    366,417
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,854
    Given: 202

    Re: Did we Improve from Week 1?

    I thought run defense was pretty darn good. You have to consider that this team is going to be built for the Big 12 which is, as a whole, a lot different than what Iowa is going to look like. To be honest, had you told me they were going to beat it up the middle to the extent they did, I would have told you they would score at least 35. SO I think we held up nicely there. Their passing game got us a couple times when we blew a coverage and then misplayed a ball. So, the defense was good enough IMO. I thought the Dline did it's job 90% of the time and looked much better.

    Offensively, we were shut out by, at best, the 3rd worst secondary we will face all year. That secondary is awful and there is no reason we weren't able to take advantage of it. The game plan should have been to force them into deep coverage and force the linebackers to sit back. Instead, they dictated the game by stuffing the running game.


    It's all snark from here on out

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: ESPNU
  • HOOPS: Iowa State @ Texas Tech
  • February 10, 2016
  • 08:00 PM