Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37

Thread: Uh oh, Hoks

  1. #16
    Speechless
    Points: 900,181, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 68.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    CycloneErik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jamerica
    Posts
    59,911
    Points
    900,181
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4,421
    Given: 3,603

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    THIS OUTLAW STATE IS A DISGRACE TO THE TRADITIONAL PURITY OF COLLEGE ATHLETICS!!


    Kansas Must Be Destroyed

    Sic Semper Jayhawks




    http://rememberingdoria.wordpress.com/

  2. #17
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 64,343, Level: 78
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 507
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    aauummm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the road again
    Posts
    3,944
    Points
    64,343
    Level
    78
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 145
    Given: 1,795

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark View Post
    This is amusing to me for two reasons:

    a) there was already a thread on this topic so you didn't need to post anything at all.

    b) your homerism somehow makes you lump secondary and major infractions together and call them the same thing.


    For the record, I thought at the time and still think that ISU's infractions weren't a huge deal and shouldn't cause fans to worry about severe penalties.
    Isn't that previous thread in a restricted forum such as the "Political Forum"? I know that's what it tells me when I try to go to it. We also have to remember that the explanations (lies) for the violations were carefully, craftily conjured up by the SUI legal defense team ((the same legal defense team that handled the PR (attempted coverup) on SUI's rape cases and stolen credit card case, etc.)).


    Last edited by aauummm; 06-17-2013 at 05:21 PM.

  3. #18
    Legend
    Points: 228,775, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    10,771
    Points
    228,775
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 573
    Given: 607

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    I hope every school sends in all of there stupid little rules they broke. Just kill the NCAA with stupid violations and show them just how stupid they are. basically overwhelm them with crap rules they broke.


    Nobody but HB knows for sure. You pretty much know nothing....like Knownothing would like to say.
    Word

  4. #19
    Addict
    Points: 70,224, Level: 82
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 1,226
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,738
    Points
    70,224
    Level
    82
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 442
    Given: 96

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Knownothing View Post
    I hope every school sends in all of there stupid little rules they broke. Just kill the NCAA with stupid violations and show them just how stupid they are. basically overwhelm them with crap rules they broke.
    This is pretty much what happens now.



  5. #20
    Pro
    Points: 92,853, Level: 94
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 297
    Overall activity: 47.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Winterset Metroplex
    Posts
    3,048
    Points
    92,853
    Level
    94
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 332
    Given: 271

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    What we should be focused on here is the fact that Bobby Elliot had nothing to do with these violations. How do I know that? BECAUSE BOBBY'S INTEGRITY IS ABOVE QUESTION, YOU STUPID CLOWNFANS!

    Or so the Register tells me.


    "Correct me if I'm wrong, Scotty.......but if I kill all the golfers, they'll lock me up and throw away the key!" Carl Spackler

  6. #21
    Pro
    Points: 36,250, Level: 58
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 400
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    JohnnyFive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,747
    Points
    36,250
    Level
    58
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 454
    Given: 504

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark View Post
    This is amusing to me for two reasons:a) there was already a thread on this topic so you didn't need to post anything at all.b) your homerism somehow makes you lump secondary and major infractions together and call them the same thing.For the record, I thought at the time and still think that ISU's infractions weren't a huge deal and shouldn't cause fans to worry about severe penalties.

    A) I checked to see if there was a thread and didnt see it. Not that it matters, because the mods here do a fine job of merging double threads.

    B) Are you honestly going to tell me there's a difference between ISU and Iowa's violations?


    Last edited by JohnnyFive; 06-17-2013 at 05:51 PM.

  7. #22
    Legend
    Points: 206,665, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ottumwa
    Posts
    10,570
    Points
    206,665
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,161
    Given: 139

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFive View Post
    A) I checked to see if there was a thread and didnt see it. Not that it matters, because the mods here do a fine job of merging double threads.

    B) Are you honestly going to tell me there's a difference between ISU and Iowa's violations?
    clearly the ncaa thought so. Seemed to be similar in that they both involved texts/phone calls but there were many, many more with ISU.



  8. #23
    Speechless
    Points: 900,181, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 68.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    CycloneErik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jamerica
    Posts
    59,911
    Points
    900,181
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4,421
    Given: 3,603

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark View Post
    clearly the ncaa thought so. Seemed to be similar in that they both involved texts/phone calls but there were many, many more with ISU.
    That's only because more guys return our phone calls and texts.



    OK, my trolling aside, I can't care any more about this than I cared about ours. Really nothing to see here. Nothing to throw a chair about, anyway.


    Kansas Must Be Destroyed

    Sic Semper Jayhawks




    http://rememberingdoria.wordpress.com/

  9. #24
    All-Star
    Points: 50,835, Level: 69
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 315
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    baller21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    1,482
    Points
    50,835
    Level
    69
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 133
    Given: 31

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFive View Post
    A) I checked to see if there was a thread and didnt see it. Not that it matters, because the mods here do a fine job of merging double threads.

    B) Are you honestly going to tell me there's a difference between ISU and Iowa's violations?


    the article clearly states that Iowa's violations were accidental, duh.



  10. #25
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 64,343, Level: 78
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 507
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    aauummm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the road again
    Posts
    3,944
    Points
    64,343
    Level
    78
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 145
    Given: 1,795

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark View Post
    clearly the ncaa thought so. Seemed to be similar in that they both involved texts/phone calls but there were many, many more with ISU.
    The article doesn't state whether the NCAA has investigated and ruled on SUI's case. Typical substandard article writing by the Register's staff.



  11. #26
    Speechless
    Points: 425,441, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    63,381
    Points
    425,441
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,227
    Given: 885

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFive View Post
    I thought about this for about five seconds, because you're right, being the bigger man is always the right call. In the end, I couldnt let it go without saying something. Not after seeing the way phonebillgate played out on HNation and in the Reg.
    Randy Peterson should be hot on this one.


    Let my Fred's Posse Ride: Georges, 3sus Naz, Dustin, Bryce, Abdel, Monte, Matt, and Jameel.

  12. #27
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 64,343, Level: 78
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 507
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    aauummm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the road again
    Posts
    3,944
    Points
    64,343
    Level
    78
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 145
    Given: 1,795

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by CycloneErik View Post
    That's only because more guys return our phone calls and texts.



    OK, my trolling aside, I can't care any more about this than I cared about ours. Really nothing to see here. Nothing to throw a chair about, anyway.
    I am giving a "like" to your first sentence.



  13. #28
    Speechless
    Points: 425,441, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    63,381
    Points
    425,441
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,227
    Given: 885

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by baller21 View Post


    the article clearly states that Iowa's violations were accidental, duh.
    Reminds me of the guy who cheats on his gf with a local stripper and says it just as mistake. The gf then replies that it was no mistake.


    Let my Fred's Posse Ride: Georges, 3sus Naz, Dustin, Bryce, Abdel, Monte, Matt, and Jameel.

  14. #29
    Pro
    Points: 36,250, Level: 58
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 400
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    JohnnyFive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,747
    Points
    36,250
    Level
    58
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 454
    Given: 504

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark View Post
    clearly the ncaa thought so. Seemed to be similar in that they both involved texts/phone calls but there were many, many more with ISU.
    I forgot the Reg said they were accidental so UI should be in the clear. ISU's were clearly on purpose.



  15. #30
    Addict
    Points: 112,638, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    madcityCY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    5,872
    Points
    112,638
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 165
    Given: 301

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark View Post
    This is amusing to me for two reasons:

    a) there was already a thread on this topic so you didn't need to post anything at all.

    b) your homerism somehow makes you lump secondary and major infractions together and call them the same thing.


    For the record, I thought at the time and still think that ISU's infractions weren't a huge deal and shouldn't cause fans to worry about severe penalties.


    Clark, amongst your hawkeye brethren, you're the exception to the rule.

    Good job - high five!

    for the record, I haven't read one of these posts that I didn't think had a sarcastic, mocking tone to them. I think everyone knows they are "no big deal" (I don't quite understand the "accidental" characterization).



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • August 29, 2015
  • 06:00 PM