Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: Uh oh, Hoks

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Pro
    Points: 32,443, Level: 55
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 607
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    JohnnyFive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,321
    Points
    32,443
    Level
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 208
    Given: 150

    Uh oh, Hoks

    I thought things in Iowa City were being done "the right way." I guess not.

    Records show several NCAA violations in UI Athletics Department | Hawk Central



  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 649,632, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 28.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    3TrueFans's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    24,210
    Points
    649,632
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,783
    Given: 190

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    This thread....Be careful throwing stones from inside your glass house.



  3. #3
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 61,040, Level: 76
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 610
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    aauummm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the road again
    Posts
    3,702
    Points
    61,040
    Level
    76
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 67
    Given: 590

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFive View Post
    I thought things in Iowa City were being done "the right way." I guess not.

    Records show several NCAA violations in UI Athletics Department | Hawk Central
    I like how the Register said that coaches "accidently" made some illegal calls and texts. I don't believe that they used that dismissive term in regards to ISU's calls although the situations were the same.

    "The University of Iowa Athletics Department reported several NCAA and Big Ten Conference violations, many of them accidental calls or text messages, between Aug. 10, 2012 and May 15, 2013, according to documents provided by UI through a public records request."


    Last edited by aauummm; 06-17-2013 at 03:38 PM.

  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 185,898, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ajk4st8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    15,391
    Points
    185,898
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 162
    Given: 350

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    -An audit of the athletics department between August 2011 and December 2012 found that the recruiting materials for women’s and men’s basketball, football, men’s and women’s swimming and field hockey did not meet NCAA bylaws because, in some cases, their envelopes and postcards contained a URL, which is considered a logo, not part of a return address. The recruiting materials had been used for years, but legislative changes that took effect Aug. 1, 2010 made them impermissible.


    Wow. They are getting desperate to win. I hate cheaters.



  5. #5
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 61,040, Level: 76
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 610
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    aauummm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the road again
    Posts
    3,702
    Points
    61,040
    Level
    76
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 67
    Given: 590

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by ajk4st8 View Post
    -An audit of the athletics department between August 2011 and December 2012 found that the recruiting materials for womenís and menís basketball, football, menís and womenís swimming and field hockey did not meet NCAA bylaws because, in some cases, their envelopes and postcards contained a URL, which is considered a logo, not part of a return address. The recruiting materials had been used for years, but legislative changes that took effect Aug. 1, 2010 made them impermissible.


    Wow. They are getting desperate to win. I hate cheaters.
    It appears that the latest violations are in addition to the above ones.

    "The University of Iowa Athletics Department reported several NCAA and Big Ten Conference violations, many of them accidental calls or text messages, between Aug. 10, 2012 and May 15, 2013, according to documents provided by UI through a public records request."




  6. #6
    Prospect
    Points: 6,329, Level: 23
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 221
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    38
    Points
    6,329
    Level
    23
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4
    Given: 19

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by aauummm View Post
    It appears that the latest violations are in addition to the above ones.

    "The University of Iowa Athletics Department reported several NCAA and Big Ten Conference violations, many of them accidental calls or text messages, between Aug. 10, 2012 and May 15, 2013, according to documents provided by UI through a public records request."

    Butt dials.



  7. #7
    Pro
    Points: 32,443, Level: 55
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 607
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    JohnnyFive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,321
    Points
    32,443
    Level
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 208
    Given: 150

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by CyJam View Post
    Butt dials.
    Butt dials are considered major violations.



  8. #8
    All-Star
    Points: 56,262, Level: 73
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 788
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    colbycheese's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    1,486
    Points
    56,262
    Level
    73
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 84
    Given: 129

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks


  9. #9
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 88,062, Level: 92
    Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 1,288
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Gunnerclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Beaverdale hood
    Posts
    4,037
    Points
    88,062
    Level
    92
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 531
    Given: 260

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    I was really hoping there wouldn't be a thread on this. Ignoring this would have been a nice statement.


    the poster formerly known as chamakhattack

  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 32,443, Level: 55
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 607
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    JohnnyFive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,321
    Points
    32,443
    Level
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 208
    Given: 150

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunnerclone View Post
    I was really hoping there wouldn't be a thread on this. Ignoring this would have been a nice statement.
    I thought about this for about five seconds, because you're right, being the bigger man is always the right call. In the end, I couldnt let it go without saying something. Not after seeing the way phonebillgate played out on HNation and in the Reg.



  11. #11
    Addict
    Points: 183,841, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ottumwa
    Posts
    9,445
    Points
    183,841
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 519
    Given: 77

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFive View Post
    I thought about this for about five seconds, because you're right, being the bigger man is always the right call. In the end, I couldnt let it go without saying something. Not after seeing the way phonebillgate played out on HNation and in the Reg.
    This is amusing to me for two reasons:

    a) there was already a thread on this topic so you didn't need to post anything at all.

    b) your homerism somehow makes you lump secondary and major infractions together and call them the same thing.


    For the record, I thought at the time and still think that ISU's infractions weren't a huge deal and shouldn't cause fans to worry about severe penalties.



  12. #12
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 61,040, Level: 76
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 610
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    aauummm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    On the road again
    Posts
    3,702
    Points
    61,040
    Level
    76
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 67
    Given: 590

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark View Post
    This is amusing to me for two reasons:

    a) there was already a thread on this topic so you didn't need to post anything at all.

    b) your homerism somehow makes you lump secondary and major infractions together and call them the same thing.


    For the record, I thought at the time and still think that ISU's infractions weren't a huge deal and shouldn't cause fans to worry about severe penalties.
    Isn't that previous thread in a restricted forum such as the "Political Forum"? I know that's what it tells me when I try to go to it. We also have to remember that the explanations (lies) for the violations were carefully, craftily conjured up by the SUI legal defense team ((the same legal defense team that handled the PR (attempted coverup) on SUI's rape cases and stolen credit card case, etc.)).


    Last edited by aauummm; 06-17-2013 at 05:21 PM.

  13. #13
    Pro
    Points: 32,443, Level: 55
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 607
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    JohnnyFive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,321
    Points
    32,443
    Level
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 208
    Given: 150

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by Clark View Post
    This is amusing to me for two reasons:a) there was already a thread on this topic so you didn't need to post anything at all.b) your homerism somehow makes you lump secondary and major infractions together and call them the same thing.For the record, I thought at the time and still think that ISU's infractions weren't a huge deal and shouldn't cause fans to worry about severe penalties.

    A) I checked to see if there was a thread and didnt see it. Not that it matters, because the mods here do a fine job of merging double threads.

    B) Are you honestly going to tell me there's a difference between ISU and Iowa's violations?


    Last edited by JohnnyFive; 06-17-2013 at 05:51 PM.

  14. #14
    Addict
    Points: 183,841, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Clark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ottumwa
    Posts
    9,445
    Points
    183,841
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 519
    Given: 77

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFive View Post
    A) I checked to see if there was a thread and didnt see it. Not that it matters, because the mods here do a fine job of merging double threads.

    B) Are you honestly going to tell me there's a difference between ISU and Iowa's violations?
    clearly the ncaa thought so. Seemed to be similar in that they both involved texts/phone calls but there were many, many more with ISU.



  15. #15
    All-Star
    Points: 48,950, Level: 68
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 800
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    baller21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    1,360
    Points
    48,950
    Level
    68
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 42
    Given: 13

    Re: Uh oh, Hoks

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFive View Post
    A) I checked to see if there was a thread and didnt see it. Not that it matters, because the mods here do a fine job of merging double threads.

    B) Are you honestly going to tell me there's a difference between ISU and Iowa's violations?


    the article clearly states that Iowa's violations were accidental, duh.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: FS1
  • Iowa State @ Oklahoma State
  • October 4, 2014
  • 11:00 AM