Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 42,362, Level: 63
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 588
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    JohnnyFive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    3,881
    Points
    42,362
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,245
    Given: 1,255

    Possible NCAA rule changes

    NCAAM Panel votes for late-game replays - ESPN

    About damn time.

    Oh, and be sure to check out the examples listed that might bring about these changes. Excuse me for a minute while I throw up again.



  2. #2
    Legend
    Points: 158,885, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 52.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    12,740
    Points
    158,885
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,456
    Given: 1,271

    Re: Possible NCAA rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFive View Post
    NCAAM Panel votes for late-game replays - ESPN

    About damn time.

    Oh, and be sure to check out the examples listed that might bring about these changes. Excuse me for a minute while I throw up again.

    Last night, I was driving home from a trip and was listening to a Cleveland radio station. These guys were so happy that they a bad call finally went there way (a valid home run by the other team at the end of the game was called a double which kept the game from being tied). Seeing us have two of the five examples on the NCAA BB list made me feel like a Cleveland fan (prior to last night).



  3. #3
    Pro
    Points: 45,756, Level: 66
    Level completed: 15%, Points required for next Level: 1,194
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CYme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Pella, IA
    Posts
    2,639
    Points
    45,756
    Level
    66
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 322
    Given: 262

    Re: Possible NCAA rule changes

    The need to change underneath the column that says "What Caused the Changes" to simply read "ISU getting *d in the *"



  4. #4
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 42,362, Level: 63
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 588
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    JohnnyFive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    3,881
    Points
    42,362
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,245
    Given: 1,255

    Re: Possible NCAA rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycsk View Post
    Last night, I was driving home from a trip and was listening to a Cleveland radio station. These guys were so happy that they a bad call finally went there way (a valid home run by the other team at the end of the game was called a double which kept the game from being tied). Seeing us have two of the five examples on the NCAA BB list made me feel like a Cleveland fan (prior to last night).
    I feel for Cleveland fans but I don't know their history.

    I do know Boston history and the only comparison I can make are that those calls led to the Bucky Dent moments of our season.

    Elijah's improbable heroics followed the KU charge. Craft's improbable three followed the Clyburn charge.


    Last edited by JohnnyFive; 05-10-2013 at 01:02 AM.

  5. #5
    Legend
    Points: 158,885, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 52.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    12,740
    Points
    158,885
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,456
    Given: 1,271

    Re: Possible NCAA rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyFive View Post
    I feel for Cleveland fans but I don't know their history.

    I do know Boston history and the only comparison I can make are that those calls led to the Bucky Dent moments of our season.

    Elijah's improbable heroics followed the KU charge. Craft's improbable three followed the Clyburn charge.

    The Cleveland announcers were pointing out how often the Yankees benefit from close (or even bad) calls. Just begs for a KU comparison.



  6. #6
    Legend
    Points: 148,725, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    12,501
    Points
    148,725
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,104
    Given: 2,169

    Re: Possible NCAA rule changes

    Part of me thinks Iowa State will be on the bad end of a block/charge rule change late in a tight game under the new rule, and we'll have bitterness that it would have gone our way under the old system, and it won't undo the unfortunate calls that happened last season.

    As far as the arbitrary standards for replay review — when it's "important" and when it "isn't" — I'll delay that discussion for now.



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 84,911, Level: 90
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 639
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    erikbj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    hiawatha, ia
    Posts
    6,808
    Points
    84,911
    Level
    90
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 889
    Given: 260

    Re: Possible NCAA rule changes

    with this new rule, I am sure there will be about 5 games next year that go to replay and calls get reversed against ISU. this cannot benefit us.



  8. #8
    Pro
    Points: 94,084, Level: 95
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 966
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Winterset Metroplex
    Posts
    3,167
    Points
    94,084
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 418
    Given: 343

    Re: Possible NCAA rule changes

    Freakin' idiots screwed up the ISU-KU example. Georges wasn't called for a block. The "blarge" was a no-call. They called him for a foul in the scramble for the loose ball after the missed shot. This detail would make the case for a change even stronger.

    I hate it when supposedly "professional" journalists screw the pooch like this. Pretty much like an article talking about how Lee Harvey Oswald shot President Lincoln in an attempt to impress Jodi Foster.


    "Correct me if I'm wrong, Scotty.......but if I kill all the golfers, they'll lock me up and throw away the key!" Carl Spackler

  9. #9
    All-Star
    Points: 29,463, Level: 52
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 287
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,528
    Points
    29,463
    Level
    52
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 341
    Given: 63

    Re: Possible NCAA rule changes

    Quote Originally Posted by erikbj View Post
    with this new rule, I am sure there will be about 5 games next year that go to replay and calls get reversed against ISU. this cannot benefit us.
    Pretty much my first thought.....this will just cause some bizarro world call to go against us and cost us a game.

    This also reminds me of just after the ISU/ Florida State football game the NCAA putting in replay shortly after (maybe even the next year?) ...when if it was in place....Senecca scores that td.



  10. #10
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 43,864, Level: 64
    Level completed: 71%, Points required for next Level: 386
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    HandSanitizer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Central US
    Posts
    3,991
    Points
    43,864
    Level
    64
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 176
    Given: 3

    Re: Possible NCAA rule changes

    While they are at it.....They need to change the Jump ball rule when the offense maintains possession. Why they don't get a new shot clock is crazy to me.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: ESPN2
  • HOOPS: Iowa State @ Baylor
  • February 16, 2016
  • 08:00 PM