Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
  1. #1
    Pro
    Points: 100,920, Level: 98
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 130
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Your first GroupVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    khaal53's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,420
    Points
    100,920
    Level
    98
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 0

    That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Pomeroy posted a blog article today that dives into this hot mess again. With his parameters over the past 2.5 seasons he actually came out with a better winning percentage with teams that chose to not foul.

    I wonder about how it would break out had he also shown the results for games with less than 5 seconds but it is still very interesting.

    I personally think the main takeaway shouldn't be that one option is better than the other but that it is so close it is situational and at the coach's discretion, like the other 1,000 decisions coaches make in the flow of the game.

    the kenpom.com blog




    I'm on Twitter: @khaal53

  2. #2
    All-Star
    Points: 14,446, Level: 36
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 404
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    JJ4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    WDM Side of Waukee
    Posts
    1,202
    Points
    14,446
    Level
    36
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    I think this goes back to officiating, too. For example, I don't think Freddy trusted the officials in the KU game wouldn't go out of their way to call a shooting foul if the ball handler tossed it at the hoop after being fouled on the floor. Likewise, there's always a risk a player could accidentally foul when a player begins shooting the ball, even when they meant to foul before that.



  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 206,422, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CyDude16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heads in the sky
    Posts
    9,266
    Points
    206,422
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 128
    Given: 535

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Stop it Khaal, you're ruining my mantra of being a better and smarter coach than Hoiberg from my couch.



  4. #4
    Rookie
    Points: 4,459, Level: 19
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 191
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    435
    Points
    4,459
    Level
    19
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 51

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Quote Originally Posted by JJ4ISU View Post
    I think this goes back to officiating, too. For example, I don't think Freddy trusted the officials in the KU game wouldn't go out of their way to call a shooting foul if the ball handler tossed it at the hoop after being fouled on the floor. Likewise, there's always a risk a player could accidentally foul when a player begins shooting the ball, even when they meant to foul before that.
    Just to note, that is somewhat taken into account in KenPom's analysis. Check out some of the situations in the appendices. (JVB's after-the-buzzer shot against Creighton makes an appearance!)

    I think another important result from his analysis is that three point shooting is significantly worse in these situations (even after removing desperation half-court shots with under 5 seconds to go):
    Another reason the fouling strategy isn’t as useful as one would think is that teams really stink at three-pointers when the defense knows they need one and there is a significant time constraint. In the 814 cases studied, teams made 98 out of 608 three-point shots (16.1%) during the possession in question. Basically, assume a player is about half as effective as normal in hitting threes when his team is down three facing a limited clock. He might even be worse since it’s possible these shots were skewed towards more effective shooters.



  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 237,177, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience Points1 year registeredSocial
    klamath632's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    8,647
    Points
    237,177
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 296
    Given: 220

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    The issue I have with the end of the Kansas game is that defenders went underneath picks.

    Underneath.

    For **** sake... WHY?!??!?! We didn't care if they made a 2-pointer with 5 seconds left in the game. I don't understand why anybody was defending a man that was inside the three-point-line.


    Quote Originally Posted by John F. Kennedy
    not because they are easy, but because they are hard ... because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win....

  6. #6
    Speechless
    Points: 727,995, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 82.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Cyclonepride's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    A pineapple under the sea
    Posts
    47,051
    Points
    727,995
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,074
    Given: 572

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Fouling is a darling of fans and the media, more so than coaches. That is my impression. Easy call to make from the cheap seats.



  7. #7
    Pro
    Points: 57,910, Level: 74
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 640
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    intrepid27's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Marion, IA
    Posts
    2,545
    Points
    57,910
    Level
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 70
    Given: 60

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Most teams do not even have one player who shoots the three better than 40%. That give you 60% odds of winning in regulation if you don't foul. At worst you go to OT.



  8. #8
    All-Star
    Points: 14,446, Level: 36
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 404
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    JJ4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    WDM Side of Waukee
    Posts
    1,202
    Points
    14,446
    Level
    36
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Quote Originally Posted by klamath632 View Post
    The issue I have with the end of the Kansas game is that defenders went underneath picks.

    Underneath.

    For **** sake... WHY?!??!?! We didn't care if they made a 2-pointer with 5 seconds left in the game. I don't understand why anybody was defending a man that was inside the three-point-line.
    Totally agree! McGee was standing just past the free throw line area when McLemore caught the pass. We shouldn't have had 1 player standing inside the 3-pt line at any time during that scenario.



  9. #9
    Legend
    Points: 166,677, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    The_Architect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Focus Town
    Posts
    11,323
    Points
    166,677
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 217
    Given: 831

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Quote Originally Posted by klamath632 View Post
    The issue I have with the end of the Kansas game is that defenders went underneath picks.

    Underneath.

    For **** sake... WHY?!??!?! We didn't care if they made a 2-pointer with 5 seconds left in the game. I don't understand why anybody was defending a man that was inside the three-point-line.
    Giving up 2 straight layups to Elijah Johnson in the last 30 seconds and only making them burn ~5 seconds off the clock was worse.


    While on live TV, Ford used a vulgar term to describe a private part of the female anatomy, adding that he was “happily married” and “got more than enough to eat at home.”

  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 25,399, Level: 48
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 151
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,449
    Points
    25,399
    Level
    48
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 42
    Given: 67

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Most coaches do not foul. May be some unique situations, but in general I think it's the prudent call to foul and eliminate the 3 ball.

    I think the Michigan coach is the latest guy that's saying,"Man, we foul and the game's over.' Cost them the No. 1 rating.


    Clone to the Bone with the up and coming IOWA STATE.

  11. #11
    Rookie
    Points: 4,459, Level: 19
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 191
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    435
    Points
    4,459
    Level
    19
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 51

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Quote Originally Posted by CTTB78 View Post
    Most coaches do not foul. May be some unique situations, but in general I think it's the prudent call to foul and eliminate the 3 ball.

    I think the Michigan coach is the latest guy that's saying,"Man, we foul and the game's over.' Cost them the No. 1 rating.
    Well, someone didn't read the article. Michigan was the only one of eleven teams in that situation on Saturday to lose. Also, their coach did want to foul (had one to give, iirc) but UW moved the ball too fast and you don't want to foul the shooter.

    But seriously, read the article. The evidence is there. Fouling doesn't change the odds significantly (if anything, it makes the odds of losing greater).



  12. #12
    Starter
    Points: 27,191, Level: 50
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 359
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    CRCy17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Colonia, NJ
    Posts
    840
    Points
    27,191
    Level
    50
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    I personally feel the status of home/away may factor into my decision to foul +3. If I am on the road (especially at a hostile environment like KU) I foul to keep the possibility of home crowd swaying the momentum greatly during overtime. At home, I like my chances more if we dont foul and face OT.



  13. #13
    Rookie
    Points: 8,395, Level: 27
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 355
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    410
    Points
    8,395
    Level
    27
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    I really luv this discussion on foul or not foul. There is NO rite or wrong answer or solution because its all situational,

    it just depends on who you are playing and where the game is being played. The truth be known even if we had fouled at KU we still could have LOST... But you will never get me to admit that we would have LOST...LOL

    Go Cyclones Beat those bums from Austin Texas dee horns...



  14. #14
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 2,281, Level: 13
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 169
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points
    andymhallman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Fairfield, Iowa
    Posts
    227
    Points
    2,281
    Level
    13
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 41

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Architect View Post
    Giving up 2 straight layups to Elijah Johnson in the last 30 seconds and only making them burn ~5 seconds off the clock was worse.
    Totally agree. I haven't seen many posters complain about this but it really irked me. The last two minutes of that game, we just stopped playing defense because we had some guys in foul trouble.



  15. #15
    Pro
    Points: 25,399, Level: 48
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 151
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,449
    Points
    25,399
    Level
    48
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 42
    Given: 67

    Re: That whole "fouling or not when up 3" thing...

    Quote Originally Posted by TurbulentEddie View Post
    Well, someone didn't read the article. Michigan was the only one of eleven teams in that situation on Saturday to lose. Also, their coach did want to foul (had one to give, iirc) but UW moved the ball too fast and you don't want to foul the shooter.

    But seriously, read the article. The evidence is there. Fouling doesn't change the odds significantly (if anything, it makes the odds of losing greater).
    Well, somebody didn't watch the Michigan game. They had every oppurtunity to foul before WI got to half court. Could have made it 12/12 who won that day.


    Clone to the Bone with the up and coming IOWA STATE.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 11:00 AM