Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 83
  1. #31
    Pro
    Points: 41,897, Level: 63
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 1,053
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    cycfan1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    3,174
    Points
    41,897
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 137
    Given: 9

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycsk View Post
    So, the bonus would apply to the next foul, not that one. I wish it weren't so.
    That can't be the correct explanation.

    With 6 fouls you are technically in bonus.

    If this is true, rule needs to be changed.



  2. #32
    Addict
    Points: 105,790, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    xboxfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    7,207
    Points
    105,790
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 600
    Given: 1,032

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by cycfan1 View Post
    That can't be the correct explanation.

    With 6 fouls you are technically in bonus.

    If this is true, rule needs to be changed.
    He's wrong. ISU was in the bonus with that foul.



  3. #33
    Pro
    Points: 21,643, Level: 44
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 7
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsCreated Album picturesVeteran
    MIClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    2,029
    Points
    21,643
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 133
    Given: 243

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycsk View Post
    My question is:

    If we didn't have control of the ball (and the foul happened before Babb even touched the ball), why didn't we get to take it out in front of our bench? The ball never got into play, so shouldn't the change of possession take place at the point where they inbounded the ball rather than where the foul occurred?
    That only happens when the ball isn't touched. The ball was touched as part of the foul play, so it goes to that spot. But Babb should have been shooting foul shots anyway.



  4. #34
    Pro
    Points: 21,643, Level: 44
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 7
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsCreated Album picturesVeteran
    MIClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    2,029
    Points
    21,643
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 133
    Given: 243

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycsk View Post
    So, the bonus would apply to the next foul, not that one. I wish it weren't so.

    No. It was the 7th foul, so free throws.



  5. #35
    Pro
    Points: 28,049, Level: 51
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 601
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    jj-cyclones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,056
    Points
    28,049
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 122
    Given: 75

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by flander1649 View Post
    ISU got F-ed in Sh!^water just like always Cylburn got killed on his drive at the end of the game and Ejim's block was completely clean.
    Cylburn was not fouled but Ejim did have clean block. They called Ejim on a foul after the block (looked like a horrible call).



  6. #36
    Speechless
    Points: 198,510, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    kingcy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Menlo, Iowa
    Posts
    18,663
    Points
    198,510
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 605
    Given: 519

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by MIClone View Post
    That only happens when the ball isn't touched. The ball was touched as part of the foul play, so it goes to that spot. But Babb should have been shooting foul shots anyway.
    The foul was called before the ball was touched. If the ball would have been touched they would have ran time off the clock.


    The gap in our economy is between what we have and what we think we ought to have--and that is a moral problem, not an economic one. - Paul Heyne

  7. #37
    Rookie
    Points: 12,635, Level: 33
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 15
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    West Des Moines
    Posts
    505
    Points
    12,635
    Level
    33
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 51

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Here is the difference to basically the vary same play.

    We shot it so our team no longer has possession. Thus that over the back on Clyburn is a "loose ball foul." Free throws are given.

    Because a team had control and passed it to a teammate and Babb is fouled before he touches it then it is considered a "team control foul" Under that classification bonus free throws are not given.



  8. #38
    Starter
    Points: 12,692, Level: 34
    Level completed: 6%, Points required for next Level: 658
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    ExCyment's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Crescent, IA
    Posts
    677
    Points
    12,692
    Level
    34
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 196
    Given: 70

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Great defensive play by Babb that got wasted. As I've always understood things, once you are in the bonus, the only foul that doesn't lead to free throws is an offensive foul where the player called for the foul possesses the ball. Would have been justice if we had sunk a miracle three to offset Smart's at the end of the first half.



  9. #39
    Pro
    Points: 32,294, Level: 55
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 756
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ankeny, IA
    Posts
    2,340
    Points
    32,294
    Level
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 96
    Given: 75

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Is anyone else with me, if Babb goes to the line, I have very little doubt he does not make both of those, we take them to OT and win in OT. We should have won that game, but our post defense hurt us in the end, open layups at the end caused our demise.



  10. #40
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 76,825, Level: 86
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 1,525
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    cyfan964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    4 blocks from the Jack
    Posts
    4,662
    Points
    76,825
    Level
    86
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 195
    Given: 373

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Definition of player control foul:

    A player-control foul is an offensive foul committed by the player/team in control of the ball (OSU inbounded). The most often seen PC foul is for what most people call a charge, even though this is not the technically correct term. This type of foul never results in free throws for the offended team, even if he offended team is in the "bonus" or "double bonus."


    Now that MBB is back, do we still have to pretend that WBB matters?

    -acgclone

  11. #41
    Speechless
    Points: 333,920, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 40.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialOverdriveVeteran
    CyArob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    18,841
    Points
    333,920
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6,145
    Given: 3,552

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    It's a player control foul on Oklahoma State because they were the "offensive team" on the inbounds. Just looked it up.



  12. #42
    Pro
    Points: 21,643, Level: 44
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 7
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsCreated Album picturesVeteran
    MIClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    2,029
    Points
    21,643
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 133
    Given: 243

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    I read through this thread hoping for an explanation, but there isn't one. That foul put us in the bonus. It wasn't a player control foul, because the OSU player wasn't driving with the ball out of control. It was an over the back, just like on a rebound. Unless there is some other explanation, Babb should have been shooting FTs.

    But it shouldn't have even come to that after all the other crappy calls (crazy 4th foul on Melvin, Melvin getting hacked before Forte stole the ball, Mcgee getting shoved before the ball arrived, etc.).



  13. #43
    All-Star
    Points: 45,930, Level: 66
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 1,020
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    tyler24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,199
    Points
    45,930
    Level
    66
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 130
    Given: 24

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by MIClone View Post
    That only happens when the ball isn't touched. The ball was touched as part of the foul play, so it goes to that spot. But Babb should have been shooting foul shots anyway.
    If I am correct, the clock stayed at 1.7 seconds. This means the ball wasn't touched and should not have been moved.



  14. #44
    Starter
    Points: 13,510, Level: 35
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 540
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredSocial10000 Experience Points
    mdk2isu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Johnston, IA
    Posts
    967
    Points
    13,510
    Level
    35
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 272
    Given: 140

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by MIClone View Post
    That only happens when the ball isn't touched. The ball was touched as part of the foul play, so it goes to that spot. But Babb should have been shooting foul shots anyway.
    No time was taken off the clock, therefore the foul was deemed to have occurred BEFORE the ball would have been touched.



  15. #45
    Pro
    Points: 32,294, Level: 55
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 756
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ankeny, IA
    Posts
    2,340
    Points
    32,294
    Level
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 96
    Given: 75

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by jj-cyclones View Post
    Cylburn was not fouled but Ejim did have clean block. They called Ejim on a foul after the block (looked like a horrible call).
    Clean Block and nice flop by Forte, T Boone Pickens $$ buys calls like that.....



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.TV
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • September 5, 2015
  • 07:00 PM