Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 83
  1. #1
    Addict
    Points: 139,655, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience Points1 year registeredSocialOverdrive
    cmjh10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    9,983
    Points
    139,655
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,840
    Given: 4,483

    Why no FT's at the end?

    I am confused why Babb wasnt able to shoot FT's at the end of the game. My roommate and I were talking and when somebody fouls someobdy else on an inbounds play, they get to shoot if they are in the bonus. But Babb didnt because he didnt have possession? Still confused about this. If anybody can explain, I would greatly appreciate it.

    Oh well, on to Baylor. Im expecting a crazy atmosphere and a great game.


    Naz Long and Dustin Hogue, the Cowboy Killers

  2. #2
    Addict
    Points: 101,234, Level: 99
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 1,816
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    xboxfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,718
    Points
    101,234
    Level
    99
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 370
    Given: 620

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    The refs don't know the rules evidently.



  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 348,153, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Grimes, IA
    Posts
    33,129
    Points
    348,153
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 876
    Given: 552

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    On the Clyburn foul with no possession there were shots. On the foul against Babb there were none.

    Why?

    OSU was gagging on ref schlong before the game.



  4. #4
    Addict
    Points: 130,374, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CysRage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    6,856
    Points
    130,374
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 831
    Given: 697

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    The refs listened and responded to Travis Ford's ********. /thread


    "The greatest risk in life is not taking one"

  5. #5
    Walk On
    Points: 9,185, Level: 28
    Level completed: 73%, Points required for next Level: 165
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Perry, IA
    Posts
    170
    Points
    9,185
    Level
    28
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    The announcers on TV said it was a player control foul, but I only thought that only applied to an offensive foul?



  6. #6
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 72,907, Level: 83
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 243
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    cyfan964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    4 blocks from the Jack
    Posts
    4,631
    Points
    72,907
    Level
    83
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 142
    Given: 317

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by spierceisu View Post
    The announcers on TV said it was a player control foul, but I only thought that only applied to an offensive foul?
    I'm guessing since they had the ball out of bounds, and we never gained possession, it was considered an offensive foul, much like a charge.


    Now that MBB is back, do we still have to pretend that WBB matters?

    -acgclone

  7. #7
    Recruit
    Points: 6,041, Level: 22
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 9
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    108
    Points
    6,041
    Level
    22
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    I agree. They got to shoot 2 free throws when Clyburn came over back. Same play Nash came over Babbs back no free throws?

    Makes no sense



  8. #8
    Recruit
    Points: 8,932, Level: 28
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 418
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    drunkstepfather's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Northwest Iowa
    Posts
    107
    Points
    8,932
    Level
    28
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 5
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Per some Iowa Boys Basketball officials at the bar I was at, the Babb foul with no shots was due to ISU not having "team control of the ball". As in, Oklahoma State was inbounding, Babb steps in to steal but never actual had the ball in his control when fouled.



  9. #9
    Legend
    Points: 123,949, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    10,313
    Points
    123,949
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 631
    Given: 569

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Babb didn't have possession of the ball, so it wasn't a back court player control foul with automatic 1&1 free throws.



  10. #10
    Legend
    Points: 123,949, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    10,313
    Points
    123,949
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 631
    Given: 569

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by CycloneKC View Post
    I agree. They got to shoot 2 free throws when Clyburn came over back. Same play Nash came over Babbs back no free throws?

    Makes no sense

    They were in the bonus, we weren't.



  11. #11
    Speechless
    Points: 191,125, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    kingcy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Menlo, Iowa
    Posts
    18,178
    Points
    191,125
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 361
    Given: 279

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    I would rather take a shot at a 3 then a 1 and 1.


    The gap in our economy is between what we have and what we think we ought to have--and that is a moral problem, not an economic one. - Paul Heyne

  12. #12
    Recruit
    Points: 6,041, Level: 22
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 9
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    108
    Points
    6,041
    Level
    22
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    OSu didn't have ball yet when we shot it and Clyburn came over back.



  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 101,234, Level: 99
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 1,816
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    xboxfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,718
    Points
    101,234
    Level
    99
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 370
    Given: 620

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycsk View Post
    They were in the bonus, we weren't.
    That foul put ISU in the bonus.



  14. #14
    Legend
    Points: 123,949, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    10,313
    Points
    123,949
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 631
    Given: 569

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    My question is:

    If we didn't have control of the ball (and the foul happened before Babb even touched the ball), why didn't we get to take it out in front of our bench? The ball never got into play, so shouldn't the change of possession take place at the point where they inbounded the ball rather than where the foul occurred?



  15. #15
    Legend
    Points: 123,949, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    10,313
    Points
    123,949
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 631
    Given: 569

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by xboxfever View Post
    That foul put ISU in the bonus.
    So, the bonus would apply to the next foul, not that one. I wish it weren't so.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: ESPN2
  • Iowa State @ Kansas State
  • February 28, 2015
  • 03:00 PM