Page 1 of 6 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 83
  1. #1
    Addict
    Points: 107,795, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience Points1 year registeredSocialOverdrive
    cmjh10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    7,696
    Points
    107,795
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,468
    Given: 2,264

    Why no FT's at the end?

    I am confused why Babb wasnt able to shoot FT's at the end of the game. My roommate and I were talking and when somebody fouls someobdy else on an inbounds play, they get to shoot if they are in the bonus. But Babb didnt because he didnt have possession? Still confused about this. If anybody can explain, I would greatly appreciate it.

    Oh well, on to Baylor. Im expecting a crazy atmosphere and a great game.


    Naz Long, the Cowboy Killer

  2. #2
    Addict
    Points: 94,577, Level: 95
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 473
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    xboxfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,047
    Points
    94,577
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 156
    Given: 261

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    The refs don't know the rules evidently.



  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 337,166, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Grimes, IA
    Posts
    31,907
    Points
    337,166
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 177
    Given: 213

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    On the Clyburn foul with no possession there were shots. On the foul against Babb there were none.

    Why?

    OSU was gagging on ref schlong before the game.



  4. #4
    Addict
    Points: 111,240, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CysRage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    6,028
    Points
    111,240
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 436
    Given: 345

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    The refs listened and responded to Travis Ford's ********. /thread


    ďI told you, I donít care if youíre black or white. I donít care if youíre rich or poor. I donít care where you come from, whether itís Texas, Florida, California, or right here in the state of Iowa, I donít care about any of thatÖ But what I did care about is moving forward from that day on, that we were one team." -Paul Rhoads

  5. #5
    Walk On
    Points: 10,786, Level: 31
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 464
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Perry, IA
    Posts
    165
    Points
    10,786
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    The announcers on TV said it was a player control foul, but I only thought that only applied to an offensive foul?



  6. #6
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 71,897, Level: 83
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 1,253
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    cyfan964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    4 blocks from the Jack
    Posts
    4,547
    Points
    71,897
    Level
    83
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 67
    Given: 158

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by spierceisu View Post
    The announcers on TV said it was a player control foul, but I only thought that only applied to an offensive foul?
    I'm guessing since they had the ball out of bounds, and we never gained possession, it was considered an offensive foul, much like a charge.


    Now that MBB is back, do we still have to pretend that WBB matters?

    -acgclone

  7. #7
    Recruit
    Points: 5,589, Level: 22
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 461
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    108
    Points
    5,589
    Level
    22
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    I agree. They got to shoot 2 free throws when Clyburn came over back. Same play Nash came over Babbs back no free throws?

    Makes no sense



  8. #8
    Recruit
    Points: 8,532, Level: 27
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 218
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    drunkstepfather's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Northwest Iowa
    Posts
    102
    Points
    8,532
    Level
    27
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Per some Iowa Boys Basketball officials at the bar I was at, the Babb foul with no shots was due to ISU not having "team control of the ball". As in, Oklahoma State was inbounding, Babb steps in to steal but never actual had the ball in his control when fouled.



  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 117,012, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,341
    Points
    117,012
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 393
    Given: 321

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Babb didn't have possession of the ball, so it wasn't a back court player control foul with automatic 1&1 free throws.



  10. #10
    Addict
    Points: 117,012, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,341
    Points
    117,012
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 393
    Given: 321

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by CycloneKC View Post
    I agree. They got to shoot 2 free throws when Clyburn came over back. Same play Nash came over Babbs back no free throws?

    Makes no sense

    They were in the bonus, we weren't.



  11. #11
    Speechless
    Points: 188,421, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    kingcy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Menlo, Iowa
    Posts
    17,513
    Points
    188,421
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 170
    Given: 115

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    I would rather take a shot at a 3 then a 1 and 1.


    The gap in our economy is between what we have and what we think we ought to have--and that is a moral problem, not an economic one. - Paul Heyne

  12. #12
    Recruit
    Points: 5,589, Level: 22
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 461
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    108
    Points
    5,589
    Level
    22
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    OSu didn't have ball yet when we shot it and Clyburn came over back.



  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 94,577, Level: 95
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 473
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    xboxfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,047
    Points
    94,577
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 156
    Given: 261

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycsk View Post
    They were in the bonus, we weren't.
    That foul put ISU in the bonus.



  14. #14
    Addict
    Points: 117,012, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,341
    Points
    117,012
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 393
    Given: 321

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    My question is:

    If we didn't have control of the ball (and the foul happened before Babb even touched the ball), why didn't we get to take it out in front of our bench? The ball never got into play, so shouldn't the change of possession take place at the point where they inbounded the ball rather than where the foul occurred?



  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 117,012, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,341
    Points
    117,012
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 393
    Given: 321

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by xboxfever View Post
    That foul put ISU in the bonus.
    So, the bonus would apply to the next foul, not that one. I wish it weren't so.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: FOX
  • Iowa State vs. Baylor
  • September 27, 2014
  • 07:20 PM