Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 83

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Addict
    Points: 117,678, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 86.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience Points1 year registeredSocialOverdrive
    cmjh10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    8,358
    Points
    117,678
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,773
    Given: 2,772

    Why no FT's at the end?

    I am confused why Babb wasnt able to shoot FT's at the end of the game. My roommate and I were talking and when somebody fouls someobdy else on an inbounds play, they get to shoot if they are in the bonus. But Babb didnt because he didnt have possession? Still confused about this. If anybody can explain, I would greatly appreciate it.

    Oh well, on to Baylor. Im expecting a crazy atmosphere and a great game.


    Naz Long, the Cowboy Killer

  2. #2
    Addict
    Points: 94,946, Level: 95
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 104
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    xboxfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,147
    Points
    94,946
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 175
    Given: 297

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    The refs don't know the rules evidently.



  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 340,040, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Grimes, IA
    Posts
    32,076
    Points
    340,040
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 339
    Given: 240

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    On the Clyburn foul with no possession there were shots. On the foul against Babb there were none.

    Why?

    OSU was gagging on ref schlong before the game.



  4. #4
    Walk On
    Points: 10,786, Level: 31
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 464
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Perry, IA
    Posts
    165
    Points
    10,786
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    The announcers on TV said it was a player control foul, but I only thought that only applied to an offensive foul?



  5. #5
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 72,265, Level: 83
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 885
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    cyfan964's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    4 blocks from the Jack
    Posts
    4,563
    Points
    72,265
    Level
    83
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 81
    Given: 193

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by spierceisu View Post
    The announcers on TV said it was a player control foul, but I only thought that only applied to an offensive foul?
    I'm guessing since they had the ball out of bounds, and we never gained possession, it was considered an offensive foul, much like a charge.


    Now that MBB is back, do we still have to pretend that WBB matters?

    -acgclone

  6. #6
    All-Star
    Points: 18,161, Level: 41
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 789
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsCreated Album picturesVeteran
    MIClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    1,664
    Points
    18,161
    Level
    41
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 121

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by cyfan964 View Post
    I'm guessing since they had the ball out of bounds, and we never gained possession, it was considered an offensive foul, much like a charge.
    But the example of a foul on a rebound would also be a situation where possession was never gained, and you shoot fouls then. I've still heard NOTHING to explain the call.



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 119,876, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 28.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,554
    Points
    119,876
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 436
    Given: 375

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    My question is:

    If we didn't have control of the ball (and the foul happened before Babb even touched the ball), why didn't we get to take it out in front of our bench? The ball never got into play, so shouldn't the change of possession take place at the point where they inbounded the ball rather than where the foul occurred?



  8. #8
    Recruit
    Points: 5,819, Level: 22
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 231
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    108
    Points
    5,819
    Level
    22
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    A foul is a foul. Stupid rule. Reward the team with free throws regardless



  9. #9
    All-Star
    Points: 18,161, Level: 41
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 789
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsCreated Album picturesVeteran
    MIClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Central Michigan
    Posts
    1,664
    Points
    18,161
    Level
    41
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 121

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycsk View Post
    My question is:

    If we didn't have control of the ball (and the foul happened before Babb even touched the ball), why didn't we get to take it out in front of our bench? The ball never got into play, so shouldn't the change of possession take place at the point where they inbounded the ball rather than where the foul occurred?
    That only happens when the ball isn't touched. The ball was touched as part of the foul play, so it goes to that spot. But Babb should have been shooting foul shots anyway.



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 188,963, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    kingcy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Menlo, Iowa
    Posts
    17,643
    Points
    188,963
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 210
    Given: 139

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by MIClone View Post
    That only happens when the ball isn't touched. The ball was touched as part of the foul play, so it goes to that spot. But Babb should have been shooting foul shots anyway.
    The foul was called before the ball was touched. If the ball would have been touched they would have ran time off the clock.


    The gap in our economy is between what we have and what we think we ought to have--and that is a moral problem, not an economic one. - Paul Heyne

  11. #11
    All-Star
    Points: 44,866, Level: 65
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 684
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    tyler24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,056
    Points
    44,866
    Level
    65
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 31
    Given: 17

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by MIClone View Post
    That only happens when the ball isn't touched. The ball was touched as part of the foul play, so it goes to that spot. But Babb should have been shooting foul shots anyway.
    If I am correct, the clock stayed at 1.7 seconds. This means the ball wasn't touched and should not have been moved.



  12. #12
    Prospect
    Points: 1,226, Level: 9
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 124
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    46
    Points
    1,226
    Level
    9
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 7

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by MIClone View Post
    That only happens when the ball isn't touched. The ball was touched as part of the foul play, so it goes to that spot. But Babb should have been shooting foul shots anyway.
    No time was taken off the clock, therefore the foul was deemed to have occurred BEFORE the ball would have been touched.



  13. #13
    Rookie
    Points: 15,729, Level: 38
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 721
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    AllInForISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    501
    Points
    15,729
    Level
    38
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 38
    Given: 15

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycsk View Post
    My question is:

    If we didn't have control of the ball (and the foul happened before Babb even touched the ball), why didn't we get to take it out in front of our bench? The ball never got into play, so shouldn't the change of possession take place at the point where they inbounded the ball rather than where the foul occurred?
    No.



  14. #14
    Addict
    Points: 119,876, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 28.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Cycsk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    9,554
    Points
    119,876
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 436
    Given: 375

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by AllInForISU View Post
    No.
    There are a few on other threads who posted the same thing as me. If no time went off the clock, then the foul must have occurred before the ball was in play. Therefore, it should go back to the spot where the in-bounds pass was made.

    I actually checked the rulebook on this and couldn't find a clear statement. It seems to me that it would be the same as an in-bounds pass that gets thrown out of bounds without anyone touching it. The ball goes back to where it was thrown in, doesn't it? The only difference here is that the location of the foul may trump the location of the in-bounds pass that was never touched in play.



  15. #15
    All-Star
    Points: 24,556, Level: 48
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 994
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    West Des Moines
    Posts
    1,095
    Points
    24,556
    Level
    48
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 29
    Given: 42

    Re: Why no FT's at the end?

    Quote Originally Posted by spierceisu View Post
    The announcers on TV said it was a player control foul, but I only thought that only applied to an offensive foul?
    You don't shoot FT on a player control foul. But, at the same time, in order for a player control foul to occur that has to be possession of the ball (I think). ON a team control fould, which is what this should have been, there are no FT either.

    So, the right call by the officials to not let Babb shoot FT, but poor job that they didn't know it in the first place. Poor job by the announcers too calling it player control. Still sucks for us, regardless.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 07:00 PM