Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33
  1. #1
    Legend
    Points: 426,055, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    State43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    10,713
    Points
    426,055
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 180
    Given: 153

    Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    I noticed he didn't have any stats, was curious why he didn't see the floor at all. Especially when Ejim was in foul trouble and Clyburn couldn't get anything going. I realize it's a different position in Ejim's case but still surprised he didn't get any time.



  2. #2
    Addict
    Points: 95,555, Level: 96
    Level completed: 26%, Points required for next Level: 1,495
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    acgclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,701
    Points
    95,555
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 277
    Given: 44

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    I hope they start to work him back in. Even if he only averages 5 mpg, he still needs some game time so that he can acquire experience for next year, when we'll count on him.



  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 92,978, Level: 94
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 172
    Overall activity: 57.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    awd4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Peru, IL
    Posts
    7,796
    Points
    92,978
    Level
    94
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 340
    Given: 313

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Very disappointed he didn't get a chance. Not sure why we didn't try him when Fred tried to put Clyburn at point for a few minutes.



  4. #4
    All-Star
    Points: 19,993, Level: 43
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 757
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    flander1649's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    1,582
    Points
    19,993
    Level
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 8

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    The Clyburn at point experiment has looked terrible this year. I have no problem trying it against the Directional Schools of the world to see how it works but not against anyone descent. Every time I have seen ISU do this I have seen their lead get smaller or loose it.


    Kyle S. Flander

  5. #5
    All-Star
    Points: 42,620, Level: 63
    Level completed: 75%, Points required for next Level: 330
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    JY07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,158
    Points
    42,620
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 17
    Given: 17

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Quote Originally Posted by flander1649 View Post
    The Clyburn at point experiment has looked terrible this year. I have no problem trying it against the Directional Schools of the world to see how it works but not against anyone descent. Every time I have seen ISU do this I have seen their lead get smaller or loose it.
    It sounds like I'm probably wrong on this, but when I was watching it it seemed like once he took lucious out and did this during the first half, we started making it a game... those first 5-10 minutes beforehand were terrible



  6. #6
    Pro
    Points: 73,259, Level: 84
    Level completed: 7%, Points required for next Level: 1,591
    Overall activity: 57.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    CarlHungus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    3,181
    Points
    73,259
    Level
    84
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 283
    Given: 203

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Maybe they didn't think he could handle the press as well as Lucious?


    "Some programs don't want to win. It's okay."
    -Poster on hawkeye lounge after the hiring of Hoiberg

  7. #7
    Walk On
    Points: 9,270, Level: 28
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 80
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Turn2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    NE of KIKV
    Posts
    220
    Points
    9,270
    Level
    28
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14
    Given: 64

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    I thought Long looked effective in the early games, particularly when he and Lucious played together. Then came the Las Vegas trip and his PT plummeted. Now it's kind of a chicken and egg thing. Has he lost it because he's not playing, or vise versa? Considering what we're getting from the starters, I'd like to see him play more, errors and all. We'll need him down the road.



  8. #8
    Starter
    Points: 38,393, Level: 60
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 657
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    976
    Points
    38,393
    Level
    60
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 184
    Given: 118

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Quote Originally Posted by JY07 View Post
    It sounds like I'm probably wrong on this, but when I was watching it it seemed like once he took lucious out and did this during the first half, we started making it a game... those first 5-10 minutes beforehand were terrible
    When Lucious checked out at the 15:00 mark we were down 7... when he checked back in 2 minutes later the Iowa lead was 9.



  9. #9
    Walk On
    Points: 2,565, Level: 14
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 185
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    135
    Points
    2,565
    Level
    14
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 2

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyballzz View Post
    When Lucious checked out at the 15:00 mark we were down 7... when he checked back in 2 minutes later the Iowa lead was 9.
    Lucious is a pretender, not a contender. He hurts our team every minute he's on the floor- TO's, circus shots, poor leadership, ill-advised jacked up 3's. At least Royce could pass the ball effectively. I'm not asking him to replace Royce, but for ******'s sake don't turn the ball over.


    My hate is not limited to just the Hawkeyes, I have plenty to go around for the Jayhawks and just Hawks in general.

  10. #10
    Rookie
    Points: 4,546, Level: 19
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 104
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Stillwater, OK
    Posts
    443
    Points
    4,546
    Level
    19
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7
    Given: 73

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Here are some relevant statistics so far, though sample size still an issue

    TO Rate (when a player ends a possession, how often is it in a turnover):
    Korie Lucious - 33.8%
    Naz Long - 48.7%
    Will Clyburn - 24.1%

    Assist Rate (when anyone on the team scores when player is on the floor, how often is the player credited with an assist):
    Korie Lucious - 29.3% (137th in the nation)
    Naz Long - 17.1%
    Will Clyburn - 12.8%



  11. #11
    Legend
    Points: 170,612, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyguytillidie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    10,378
    Points
    170,612
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 65
    Given: 83

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Naz has been losing time because of his defense. Fred will put him in and then Naz gets burned by his guy. Fred will immediately pull him out afterwards.



  12. #12
    Legend
    Points: 426,055, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    State43's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    10,713
    Points
    426,055
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 180
    Given: 153

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Though naz can take care of the ball on offense, he does lack the necessary quickness it takes to be point from what I can tell. I still think he will be a solid player for us in the coming years.



  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 95,555, Level: 96
    Level completed: 26%, Points required for next Level: 1,495
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    acgclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    6,701
    Points
    95,555
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 277
    Given: 44

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Quote Originally Posted by State43 View Post
    Though naz can take care of the ball on offense, he does lack the necessary quickness it takes to be point from what I can tell. I still think he will be a solid player for us in the coming years.
    I hope that MM can be a legit and true PG for us. So far, Fred seems enamored with combos and but you always need at least one true PG that can make good decisions with the ball for your half court O.



  14. #14
    All-Star
    Points: 21,994, Level: 45
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 556
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclone87's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    1,490
    Points
    21,994
    Level
    45
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 23
    Given: 20

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Quote Originally Posted by flander1649 View Post
    The Clyburn at point experiment has looked terrible this year. I have no problem trying it against the Directional Schools of the world to see how it works but not against anyone descent. Every time I have seen ISU do this I have seen their lead get smaller or loose it.
    Clyburn played a pretty good game at point guard against UNLV, actually looked much better once we moved him over in that game. He just wasn't his normal self at all last night. I wonder what happened to his hand in the second half of BYU game when he had it taped up, had it taped for the FGCU game as well, seemed to play a bit more timid in the BYU game after that and didn't do to much in FGCU game either. Not saying that is why he had such a terrible game last night, but may be something to consider.



  15. #15
    Speechless
    Points: 269,700, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    isuno1fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Clive, Iowa
    Posts
    17,481
    Points
    269,700
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 110
    Given: 22

    Re: Why did Naz Long not play last night?

    Clyburn at point is AWFUL. It is beyond terrible. I'd rather see Tyrus run the point if KL is out and we aren't gonna play Naz. The Clyburn at point experiment needs to be over.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 11:00 AM