Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 99

Thread: Barnett

  1. #31
    Addict
    Points: 138,676, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,239
    Points
    138,676
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 32
    Given: 49

    Re: Barnett

    Just one play from the line of scrimmage I would like to see all three line up in the back field, that would really **** with the d-coordinator.


    As far as depth goes though, the combination of White, Woodbury, Olaseni, Basabe, and Uthoff is much better than Niang, Ejim, Edozie, Gibson. Not because of the top 2, but because of the next 2 or 3. -DeanVogs

  2. #32
    Pro
    Points: 28,552, Level: 51
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 98
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    2,456
    Points
    28,552
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by CyDude16 View Post
    FIFY.
    And we would go on to beat 3 ranked teams!! Yeah, but he sucks though.



  3. #33
    Addict
    Points: 204,323, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CyDude16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heads in the sky
    Posts
    8,953
    Points
    204,323
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20
    Given: 64

    Re: Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by CRAZYGREG View Post
    And we would go on to beat 3 ranked teams!! Yeah, but he sucks though.
    I didnt know he beat them all by himself.

    Look at his stats, he has regressed this season. Unfortunately, it's a shame neither Jantz nor JB could get it done and seal the job. Obviously thats not the case...

    CrazyGreg you are as pro Barnett as Clones21 is pro Jantz... And both of you are morons.



  4. #34
    Pro
    Points: 28,552, Level: 51
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 98
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    2,456
    Points
    28,552
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by CyDude16 View Post
    I didnt know he beat them all by himself.

    Look at his stats, he has regressed this season. Unfortunately, it's a shame neither Jantz nor JB could get it done and seal the job. Obviously thats not the case...

    CrazyGreg you are as pro Barnett as Clones21 is pro Jantz... And both of you are morons.
    No - I am just REALLY REALLY anti-Jantz and very appreciative that Barnett was able to get us some very good signature wins. I have 0 problems with SR taking over - anyone BUT Jantz!



  5. #35
    Addict
    Points: 158,327, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Palmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Johnston, IA
    Posts
    7,888
    Points
    158,327
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 32
    Given: 2

    Re: Barnett

    regardless of what happens...JB will always be a part of ISU history with beating No #2. Great teammate....even better person off the field.


    Carrying the banner for ISU.


  6. #36
    Addict
    Points: 204,323, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CyDude16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heads in the sky
    Posts
    8,953
    Points
    204,323
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20
    Given: 64

    Re: Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by CRAZYGREG View Post
    No - I am just REALLY REALLY anti-Jantz and very appreciative that Barnett was able to get us some very good signature wins. I have 0 problems with SR taking over - anyone BUT Jantz!
    Stats are very telling this season who the less ******** of the two options were...

    Look it up. Or I'll save you the time. 13 Tds-11 int 63% comp ; 6 tds-4 ints 48% comp

    One of which has been playing qb quite a bit longer then the other.. There is some dose of reality for you.



  7. #37
    Pro
    Points: 28,552, Level: 51
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 98
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    2,456
    Points
    28,552
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: Barnett

    JB: 1-2 in the BIg 12 (win on the road over #13 TCU)
    SJ: 1-3 (only win over the worst defense in college football history)

    Sorry numbers don't lie

    JB never got the chance to play any non-conference games.



  8. #38
    Legend
    Points: 314,793, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    cyhiphopp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Johnston
    Posts
    13,815
    Points
    314,793
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 238
    Given: 460

    Re: Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by CyDude16 View Post
    Stats are very telling this season who the less ******** of the two options were...

    Look it up. Or I'll save you the time. 13 Tds-11 int 63% comp ; 6 tds-4 ints 48% comp

    One of which has been playing qb quite a bit longer then the other.. There is some dose of reality for you.
    Stats are fine to look at, but they don't tell you what teams they played against and I'd rather have ****ty stats and a win than decents stats and only one conference win.



  9. #39
    Legend
    Points: 314,793, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    cyhiphopp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Johnston
    Posts
    13,815
    Points
    314,793
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 238
    Given: 460

    Re: Barnett

    I like the potential Jantz had as a starter, but he wasn't able to deliver on that potential enough to win conference games other than Baylor.

    JB has his limitations and has not played his best this season. That doesn't mean he can't improve and provides no value to the QB depth chart.



  10. #40
    Pro
    Points: 28,552, Level: 51
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 98
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    2,456
    Points
    28,552
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: Barnett

    Starts only:

    JB: 47-96 (48.96%) 6 TDs 3 Ints

    SJ(minus crappy Baylor) 45-89 (50.56%) 2 TDs 6 Ints



  11. #41
    Addict
    Points: 204,323, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CyDude16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heads in the sky
    Posts
    8,953
    Points
    204,323
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20
    Given: 64

    Re: Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by CRAZYGREG View Post
    Starts only:

    JB: 47-96 (48.96%) 6 TDs 3 Ints

    SJ(minus crappy Baylor) 45-89 (50.56%) 2 TDs 6 Ints
    lolololol take out a game because it was against a terrible defense and want to make your guy look better. (The same D that just beat K-state and held them to under 30 points)

    I've never once said Jantz was stellar, both struggled this year and weren't getting the job done. But the team is bigger then one guy. Our whole offense had struggles, even outside of the qb play.



  12. #42
    Pro
    Points: 39,295, Level: 61
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 1,055
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    3,067
    Points
    39,295
    Level
    61
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 117
    Given: 32

    Re: Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by CRAZYGREG View Post
    JB: 1-2 in the BIg 12 (win on the road over #13 TCU)
    SJ: 1-3 (only win over the worst defense in college football history)

    Sorry numbers don't lie

    JB never got the chance to play any non-conference games.
    I don't want to defend CyDude16 but JB did get a couple chances in non-conference. He looked awful last year vs. Rutgers and the same in his two possessions this year vs. Western Illinois. Also, that defense you call one of the worst in college football history just kept a team out of the National Title game.



  13. #43
    Pro
    Points: 28,552, Level: 51
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 98
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    2,456
    Points
    28,552
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: Barnett

    Even if you put the numbers in SJ has 7 TDs and 7 INTs. JB has 6-3

    So a 2-1 ratio or a 1-1 ratio.... hmmmmm that is not even including fumbles


    Last edited by CRAZYGREG; 11-19-2012 at 03:23 PM.

  14. #44
    Legend
    Points: 148,537, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Here nor there
    Posts
    10,311
    Points
    148,537
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 207
    Given: 186

    Re: Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by cyhiphopp View Post
    Stats are fine to look at, but they don't tell you what teams they played against and I'd rather have ****ty stats and a win than decents stats and only one conference win.
    People still think there is a difference between JB and Jantz? JFC.
    JB and Jantz are not difference makers, at least in a positive way. Neither of them have a conference win where you can say outstanding play by the QB was the reason ISU won. JB would be 1-3 this year if he went against TT, Baylor, OU, and UT. JB starting against MU, UT, Baylor, and A$M would not have led to wins.



  15. #45
    Addict
    Points: 204,323, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CyDude16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heads in the sky
    Posts
    8,953
    Points
    204,323
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20
    Given: 64

    Re: Barnett

    Quote Originally Posted by CRAZYGREG View Post
    Even if you put the numbers in SJ has 7 TDs and 7 INTs. JB has 6-3

    So a 2-1 ratio or a 3-1 ratio.... hmmmmm that is not even including fumbles
    Can't even admit JB wasn't getting the job done either yet?

    Good grief.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 06:00 PM