Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
  1. #1
    Speechless
    Points: 274,405, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    16,332
    Points
    274,405
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 72
    Given: 7

    Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Here was my question to him.
    Alex (Chicago): Do you think Wesley Johnson is the most underrated player in the Big XII?

    Doug Gottlieb: (4:52 PM ET ) He might be the most underdiscussed. He's a really good player and had a really good freshman year that no one talked about. He just doesn't have any backcourt to get him the basketball. But because of some of the guys they had to run off, their PG/off guard situation isn't that good. But people really like him.



  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 332,721, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUFan22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Grimes, IA
    Posts
    31,630
    Points
    332,721
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 39
    Given: 37

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Ugh...the run off comment.



  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 249,684, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    BryceC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    16,402
    Points
    249,684
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 0

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Yeah, that isn't really all that good to see, but it's not totally inaccurate except for Dodie.



  4. #4
    All-Star
    Points: 30,778, Level: 53
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 72
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    goldmember's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,426
    Points
    30,778
    Level
    53
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    I prefer "recruited over" instead of run off. Regardless, I still like Gottlieb.



  5. #5
    Pro
    Points: 23,291, Level: 46
    Level completed: 75%, Points required for next Level: 259
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    psycln11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    2,600
    Points
    23,291
    Level
    46
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Quote Originally Posted by goldmember View Post
    I prefer "recruited over" instead of run off. Regardless, I still like Gottlieb.

    "recruited over" by two walk-on JUCO's??


    Some people wear Superman pajamas. Superman wears Chuck Norris pajamas.

  6. #6
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 56,691, Level: 73
    Level completed: 77%, Points required for next Level: 359
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,314
    Points
    56,691
    Level
    73
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Quote Originally Posted by goldmember View Post
    I prefer "recruited over" instead of run off. Regardless, I still like Gottlieb.
    Well, clearly Mike Taylor was runoff, for good reason.

    Dodie also looks like a runoff from the outside, but again, good reasons for his departure.

    McIntosh was runoff, maybe not be McD, but in some fashion. The wanting to play closer to home excuse doesn't cut it.



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 343,843, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    isucyfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    19,846
    Points
    343,843
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3
    Given: 0

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Were McIntosh and Dunson not wanted back by the staff? I would think they would have wanted them back over Peterson and Haluska.


    Forever trying to find a cure for the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

  8. #8
    Addict
    Points: 170,313, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    snowcraig2.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    6,965
    Points
    170,313
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 77
    Given: 15

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Quote Originally Posted by isucyfan View Post
    Were McIntosh and Dunson not wanted back by the staff? I would think they would have wanted them back over Peterson and Haluska.
    Peterson / Haluska is a better combo that Cmac / Dunson, and its not even close.



  9. #9
    Pro
    Points: 57,930, Level: 74
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 620
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    jahfg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,686
    Points
    57,930
    Level
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12
    Given: 8

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Cory McIntosh seemed like a good kid and had a good attitude, but he was not a D-1 point guard. Some might say the same thing about Peterson, but I think he has already proved to be more effective than CM. Haluska is at the very least just as good as Dunson. Haluska is going to have some big games this year for us (similar to Dodie's against Mizzou). He is one of those players that may go for 2 one game and 16 the next.



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 343,843, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    isucyfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    19,846
    Points
    343,843
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3
    Given: 0

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Quote Originally Posted by snowcraig2.0 View Post
    Peterson / Haluska is a better combo that Cmac / Dunson, and its not even close.
    I think so far, Dunson would rate higher than Haluska, in my opinion. That could change, but remember that Dodie was a freshman last year, and would possibly be as improved as Wes, CJ, etc. this year. His ceiling was higher, IMO.


    Forever trying to find a cure for the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

  11. #11
    Pro
    Points: 57,930, Level: 74
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 620
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    jahfg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,686
    Points
    57,930
    Level
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12
    Given: 8

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Quote Originally Posted by isucyfan View Post
    I think so far, Dunson would rate higher than Haluska, in my opinion. That could change, but remember that Dodie was a freshman last year, and would possibly be as improved as Wes, CJ, etc. this year. His ceiling was higher, IMO.

    That may be true, but from what I have seen, the edge has to go to Haluska in the here and now. In my opinion, of course.



  12. #12
    Addict
    Points: 50,801, Level: 69
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 349
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Drive4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    972
    Posts
    5,536
    Points
    50,801
    Level
    69
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7
    Given: 41

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    What are you people basing your thoughts of Peterson and Haluska being better than Dodie or Cmac? I'm not being a jerk, really just curious. Dodie was clutch and hit some big shots against Nebraska, KU, and Mizzou. I fail to see what Haluska has done at this point. I give Peterson credit for bouncing back after his poor showing Friday night, but he still hasn't shown the ability to run the point. I'm not saying Cmac and Dodie were great players(or even good) but they atleast produced at times.



  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 170,313, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    snowcraig2.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    6,965
    Points
    170,313
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 77
    Given: 15

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Sorry, but there is no way Dunson is better than Haluska. Haluska shoots the three as well as, and has a VASTLY superior mid-range game that Dunson. My only concern with Haluska was defensively, and so far he has actually shown to be a very disruptive defender. Dunson was a good kid, but Haluska brings way more to the two guard spot.



  14. #14
    Addict
    Points: 44,292, Level: 65
    Level completed: 4%, Points required for next Level: 1,258
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    mwitt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    5,801
    Points
    44,292
    Level
    65
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 1

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    Quote Originally Posted by Drive4cy View Post
    I'm not saying Cmac and Dodie were great players(or even good) but they atleast produced at times.
    Petersen had a better game Saturday night than McIntosh had all of last year.

    A big advantage with Dodie is he was a better defender than either Petey or Haluska, at least so far, but Haluska and Petersen seem to move better without the ball in their hands, and I think they both have a better shot.



  15. #15
    Pro
    Points: 57,930, Level: 74
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 620
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    jahfg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,686
    Points
    57,930
    Level
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12
    Given: 8

    Re: Doug Gotlieb Chat

    I think Haluska is a more athletic player. He runs well off screens and is quicker than Dunson. We may have not seen it yet, but I think Haluska is a better shooter than Dunson. At the least, he is just as good of a shooter. I think he poses more of a threat than Dunson did.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 06:00 PM