Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Walk On
    Points: 8,930, Level: 28
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 420
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    sheldon
    Posts
    147
    Points
    8,930
    Level
    28
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Question game strategy ques.

    ok...so I've heard lot's of logic on both sides, and the middle ground
    about what the reasoning is behind slowing the game down when you
    lead by a couple touchdowns and have a young D, like we do.

    Somebody here mentioned that we were pretty successful running
    the ball until Toledo sold out to stop the run since they "knew" we
    were trying to burn the clock. (or something like that)

    Now, if that's so, and I believe it is, then you might say that the
    very reason we -were- pretty successful running (up to then)was
    the fact that we -passing- the ball aggressively (up to that point)?

    And, the reason we became unable to take enough time off the clock
    so as to win in reg. was because we tried to slow down the pace, as
    opposed to keep sticking the knife in offensively...hmmm

    Ok, so maybe what we're really needing to see improved, as far as game
    strategy calling, is the need to be much more -unpredictable- later
    in the game and not neccesarily more or less conservative.

    I mean, if they "know" you're going to run, and you don't, and instead
    go over the top to TB say and burn them for TD, do think they're going
    to be as likely to sell out to stop the run the next time, whether our
    defense holds them or not?

    Another thing nobody has mentioned, what effect do you suppose
    slowing down the game has on our defense? Now, if they were a
    bunch of jrs. and srs. and were game tested and proven in the trenches,
    would be one thing, but they're not. Our offense is our real strength,
    and everybody knows it.

    Now, to me, all I'm doing is stating the obvious up to this point, (and
    maybe not), but...

    Why then, do some of us seem to think it makes sense to play to a
    strategy that -in the end- puts the most responsibility on the defenses shoulders?

    If our offense is our trump suit, and it is, and we have an unlimited
    number of aces, shouldn't we keep playing the high card?

    peace

    m.



  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 400,760, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 49.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    59,324
    Points
    400,760
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 614
    Given: 389
    Katie Couric quote might be applicable to the above situation:
    When she was considering leaving the familiar environs of NBC, Couric wrote that a friend told her: "A boat is always safe in the harbor. But it's not what it was built for." "Hopefully," she wrote, "we won't all end up like Gilligan."


    Let my Fred's Posse Ride: Georges, Naz, Hogue, Bryce, Nader, Monte, Matt, and McKay.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 07:00 PM