Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 33 of 33
  1. #31
    Legend
    Points: 160,516, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 39.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    HFCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    10,553
    Points
    160,516
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 557
    Given: 431

    Re: Big 12 Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by MNCyGuy View Post
    Haven't they run studies that basically said the whole "TV markets" thing was a bunch of crap unless you are launching your own network like the Big Ten? Since we're not doing that the only way you'd add TV's would be through adding quality games with national interest (thus the interest in Clemson/FSU last summer). No one cares about Louisville this year, even though they're undefeated. Stay at 10.
    Even for the Big Ten, brands trump TV markets in a gigantic way. Nebraska vs. Missouri being the prime example.

    They could have added KC and STL to the major markets forcing BTN onto first tier but they added Omaha and Lincoln instead to gain national clout at the expense of forcing BTN into less tier one packages.

    Nebraska adds eyeballs to their nationally televised games. Missouri would have meant more BTN reach.



  2. #32
    All-Star
    Points: 34,430, Level: 57
    Level completed: 15%, Points required for next Level: 1,020
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CycloneVet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Cedar Falls
    Posts
    1,345
    Points
    34,430
    Level
    57
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 46
    Given: 595

    Re: Big 12 Expansion

    I for one love the current schedule, familiarity with a team would tilt in our favor against traditionally good teams. We may be able to win a few instead of the dominance that some teams have against us, Im looking at you OU. I am sure playing them every 3 years hurt us a little, especially when they were with Texas and TTech, now that was brutal.

    I disagree with adding TCU was a panic move, they are a quality football program, which is what the expansion as all about in the first place, plus its 2 wins for us in BBall, which I will take all day.

    No more texas schools however, so SMU and Rice are out IMO, definitely do not increase TV revenue. Louisville would be a good addition in both sports. Keeps it a little more regional.

    If K-State wins out, then I surely dont see them being left out. They have shown up in a big way. KSU would match up better with Alabama than potentially anyone else in the country. Their O-line could matchup with Bama. Plus if they would happen to win, Bill Snyder would almost surely ride off into the sunset wouldnt he, then KSU would return to whipping boy status because I cant see anyone else having the success he does there. Obviously I could be wrong.



  3. #33
    Rookie
    Points: 7,416, Level: 25
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 134
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience Points
    ILiftWithRoyce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    563
    Points
    7,416
    Level
    25
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 13
    Given: 19

    Re: Big 12 Expansion

    Quote Originally Posted by weR138 View Post
    If we're not going to expand we have to change our name. Big 12 with 10 teams is ****ing stupid.
    change to what? Big 10? I think there's already one of those


    I AM SO FOOTBALL TO BE YOUR PROUD COACH

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 11:00 AM