Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 33
  1. #16
    Pro
    Points: 73,900, Level: 84
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 950
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    brokenloginagain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,054
    Points
    73,900
    Level
    84
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 106
    Given: 0

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by kucyclone View Post
    Comparing last year's non-conference schedule to this year's, using KenPom's pythag rankings from last season, it is clear that this season's schedule is worse, unless many teams on this year's schedule are a lot better than last year.

    Attachment 15619

    A big reason for this, as you can see, is that we went incredibly cheap for the guarantee games this season, inviting some of the worst teams available in the country to play at Hilton, which will do nothing but drag our SOS down from the back-end, even if the top-end games are more-or-less equal.

    There's three games - perhaps four if Iowa is good; I think we all have our doubts - on the non-conference schedule that can help us with the selection committee, the two Vegas games and against BYU, all played within eight days at the end of November. Any other non-conference game won't have a positive effect for the selection committee. So how are we preparing for that crucial three-game non-conference stretch? By playing Southern, Alabama A&M, Campbell, and North Carolina A&T at home.

    If we really want to invest in our basketball program, we can't continue to go this cheap with non-conference scheduling.
    the reason we are "preparing" against weak competition before the vegas games is because those teams are in the tournament - we have to play them, that's how those tourneys work.



  2. #17
    Pro
    Points: 52,987, Level: 71
    Level completed: 30%, Points required for next Level: 1,063
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    HoopsTournament's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    St. Joseph, MO
    Posts
    2,783
    Points
    52,987
    Level
    71
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 323
    Given: 404

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by brokenloginagain View Post
    the reason we are "preparing" against weak competition before the vegas games is because those teams are in the tournament - we have to play them, that's how those tourneys work.
    Can you really call it a tournament when even if you lose to a team in the preliminary game, you still advance to semis. That happened when Gonzaga lost to SD State two years ago in a "tournament".



  3. #18
    All-Star
    Points: 47,537, Level: 67
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 813
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Let's Go State's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Far Western Iowa
    Posts
    1,843
    Points
    47,537
    Level
    67
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 1

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Do we not play UNI?

    edit: just checked.... Nope



  4. #19
    All-Star
    Points: 13,478, Level: 35
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 572
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    WooClone15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Wooster, OH
    Posts
    1,508
    Points
    13,478
    Level
    35
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 237
    Given: 380

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    So how does scheduling work for basketball? I always assumed that it was like football: you plan your games a few years in advance. Jason King makes it sound like you plan your schedule at the beginning of each season, or at least on a much shorter time frame.



  5. #20
    Speechless
    Points: 260,186, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    16,184
    Points
    260,186
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 869
    Given: 751

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by WooClone15 View Post
    So how does scheduling work for basketball? I always assumed that it was like football: you plan your games a few years in advance. Jason King makes it sound like you plan your schedule at the beginning of each season, or at least on a much shorter time frame.
    A good deal of it is shorter than the time frame for football. You can be filling in games pretty late. The larger home & home series are generally more in advance but not to the extent that football is.



  6. #21
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 71,164, Level: 82
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 286
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    peteypie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,941
    Points
    71,164
    Level
    82
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 514
    Given: 707

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Don't dicount Cambell. KenPom is wrong on them, they beat some powerhouses last year.



  7. #22
    Addict
    Points: 70,918, Level: 82
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 532
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    5,166
    Points
    70,918
    Level
    82
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 121
    Given: 196

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclonin View Post
    Wow @Iowa and at home against FGC in the same day. Good thing we have depth.
    lol. good catch....on a relative basis, I agree with our score and OSU. Kansas does seem weak - by their standards, but I hope they beat the B10 teams.


    "We are first and foremost an educational institution that values integrity, honesty and treating others with fairness and respect".

    -ISU President Gregory Geoffroy; circa May 2003.

  8. #23
    All-Star
    Points: 25,372, Level: 48
    Level completed: 83%, Points required for next Level: 178
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    CYUL8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    1,080
    Points
    25,372
    Level
    48
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 54
    Given: 208

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    I'm always amazed by this board...but then again it is CycloneFANATIC.

    Unless you are a perennial top 10 team, you don't schedule marquee games for your non-conference slate. Sure, a few tough teams here and there (relatively speaking) are expected - but it's not like we're going to be playing a full on conference level schedule every year.

    The other thing is that we are definitely not the only team that does this - if you read King's analysis of just about every team but Kansas, he says something to the effect of "this schedule is weak". So tell me, would you rather have a strong SOS and lose over 50% of them, or have a so-called weak SOS and win them all? Remember that while SOS matters some, its the recency of your success when it comes to selection Sunday that matters- if you are hot in Jan/Feb it really doesn't matter how tough your non-con schedule was (within reason).

    Best course of action - win them all, win the conference. I don't think anyone would put us on the bubble then.



  9. #24
    Pro
    Points: 73,900, Level: 84
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 950
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    brokenloginagain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,054
    Points
    73,900
    Level
    84
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 106
    Given: 0

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsTournament View Post
    Can you really call it a tournament when even if you lose to a team in the preliminary game, you still advance to semis. That happened when Gonzaga lost to SD State two years ago in a "tournament".
    all these events are structured like this and called "exempt" tourneys because you get 4 games but only have to count 2 in your total games allowed. you get two winnable games for "free" and you control the fact you'll get decent competition. otherwise no high majors would ever sign up.



  10. #25
    Legend
    Points: 169,953, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    The_Architect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Focus Town
    Posts
    11,867
    Points
    169,953
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 486
    Given: 2,040

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by peteypie View Post
    Don't dicount Cambell. KenPom is wrong on them, they beat some powerhouses last year.


    While on live TV, Ford used a vulgar term to describe a private part of the female anatomy, adding that he was “happily married” and “got more than enough to eat at home.”

  11. #26
    Pro
    Points: 73,900, Level: 84
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 950
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    brokenloginagain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,054
    Points
    73,900
    Level
    84
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 106
    Given: 0

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by CYUL8R View Post
    I'm always amazed by this board...but then again it is CycloneFANATIC.

    Unless you are a perennial top 10 team, you don't schedule marquee games for your non-conference slate. Sure, a few tough teams here and there (relatively speaking) are expected - but it's not like we're going to be playing a full on conference level schedule every year.

    The other thing is that we are definitely not the only team that does this - if you read King's analysis of just about every team but Kansas, he says something to the effect of "this schedule is weak". So tell me, would you rather have a strong SOS and lose over 50% of them, or have a so-called weak SOS and win them all? Remember that while SOS matters some, its the recency of your success when it comes to selection Sunday that matters- if you are hot in Jan/Feb it really doesn't matter how tough your non-con schedule was (within reason).

    Best course of action - win them all, win the conference. I don't think anyone would put us on the bubble then.
    "recency" no longer matters, they got rid of that criteria a few years ago.



  12. #27
    All-Star
    Points: 25,372, Level: 48
    Level completed: 83%, Points required for next Level: 178
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    CYUL8R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    1,080
    Points
    25,372
    Level
    48
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 54
    Given: 208

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by brokenloginagain View Post
    "recency" no longer matters, they got rid of that criteria a few years ago.
    It may not matter as a statistic...but some of this selection is still subjective - that was my point. Until you get to a place where the selection for the tournament is 100% driven by computers and the human factor is eliminated you can't say it doesn't matter.

    I still stick to my bottom line - win them all, win the conference and it's a done deal for the tourney.



  13. #28
    Addict
    Points: 97,238, Level: 97
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 1,812
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    9,634
    Points
    97,238
    Level
    97
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 317
    Given: 701

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by brokenloginagain View Post
    "recency" no longer matters, they got rid of that criteria a few years ago.
    Concur.



  14. #29
    Addict
    Points: 97,238, Level: 97
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 1,812
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    9,634
    Points
    97,238
    Level
    97
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 317
    Given: 701

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by kucyclone View Post
    Comparing last year's non-conference schedule to this year's, using KenPom's pythag rankings from last season, it is clear that this season's schedule is worse, unless many teams on this year's schedule are a lot better than last year.

    Attachment 15619

    A big reason for this, as you can see, is that we went incredibly cheap for the guarantee games this season, inviting some of the worst teams available in the country to play at Hilton, which will do nothing but drag our SOS down from the back-end, even if the top-end games are more-or-less equal.

    There's three games - perhaps four if Iowa is good; I think we all have our doubts - on the non-conference schedule that can help us with the selection committee, the two Vegas games and against BYU, all played within eight days at the end of November. Any other non-conference game won't have a positive effect for the selection committee. So how are we preparing for that crucial three-game non-conference stretch? By playing Southern, Alabama A&M, Campbell, and North Carolina A&T at home.

    If we really want to invest in our basketball program, we can't continue to go this cheap with non-conference scheduling.
    When the schedule was released, I thought it was a tiny step up from last season. I'm not so sure.

    BYU = UNI. As you said, if Iowa is relevant, that's a shot at a decent road win.

    The early-tournament is the only other place to pick up much cred (which will happen only by winning those games). The cupcakes appear cupcakier.

    I don't know how much stock to put in the KemPom comparison at this point — reflected in your qualifier-comment, "unless many teams on this year's schedule are a lot better than last year." It may be a little better or a little worse, but it almost certainly has no more SOS-advantage than 2011-12.

    The overall non-league schedule needs some work — We can all discuss ways to bulk up the non-conference in a different thread. We can't change the current schedule.

    Anything less than 11-2 this season is likely to elevate the urgency of performance in-conference.



  15. #30
    Addict
    Points: 66,822, Level: 80
    Level completed: 24%, Points required for next Level: 1,228
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Rural's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    6,210
    Points
    66,822
    Level
    80
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 317
    Given: 222

    Re: Jason King: Big 12 Nonconference schedule analysis

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclones500 View Post
    When the schedule was released, I thought it was a tiny step up from last season. I'm not so sure.

    BYU = UNI. As you said, if Iowa is relevant, that's a shot at a decent road win.

    The early-tournament is the only other place to pick up much cred (which will happen only by winning those games). The cupcakes appear cupcakier.

    I don't know how much stock to put in the KemPom comparison at this point — reflected in your qualifier-comment, "unless many teams on this year's schedule are a lot better than last year." It may be a little better or a little worse, but it almost certainly has no more SOS-advantage than 2011-12.

    The overall non-league schedule needs some work — We can all discuss ways to bulk up the non-conference in a different thread. We can't change the current schedule.

    Anything less than 11-2 this season is likely to elevate the urgency of performance in-conference.


    Snort, guffaw, cackle



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Mediacom 22
  • HOOPS: Iowa State vs. Drake
  • December 20, 2014
  • 04:00 PM