Why Barnet is the better option
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26
  1. #1
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 45,446, Level: 65
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 104
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    GoSTATE71's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,682
    Points
    45,446
    Level
    65
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 31
    Given: 9

    Why Barnet is the better option

    Each qb won 3 games last year, Barnet won games against big 12 teams and jantz well it takes miracles to win games with him. Jantz didn't even show up to the press conference last night he just left after the game and that makes me mad. Our only offense is the zone read, and Barnet runs it well. Barnet had a fumble problem last year but he's clearly a better leader and players responded to him better, it was obvious. The O-line didn't play well but my god, jantz threw a floater straight into the TT secondary with no cyclone within 10 yards, that's not on the o-line that's a terrible qb at work. Barnet beat two ranked teams as starter, I'm pretty sure jantz would throw 2 interceptions in a high school game. At this point if our only offense is the zone read, let Barnet run it



  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 67,195, Level: 80
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 855
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    TXCyclones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Heath, TX
    Posts
    3,229
    Points
    67,195
    Level
    80
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 269
    Given: 219

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Because he's not Jantz.


    Remember, you're unique. Just like everyone else.

  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 212,028, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CyDude16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heads in the sky
    Posts
    9,835
    Points
    212,028
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 373
    Given: 1,319

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    *Barnett is not a better option.

    If he was there wouldn't be any reason why he's splitting time now with the 2's now with Richardson if he was still a better option.



  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 280,277, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    chuckd4735's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny, Iowa
    Posts
    15,516
    Points
    280,277
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,326
    Given: 273

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Quote Originally Posted by GoSTATE71 View Post
    Each qb won 3 games last year, Barnet won games against big 12 teams and jantz well it takes miracles to win games with him. Jantz didn't even show up to the press conference last night he just left after the game and that makes me mad. Our only offense is the zone read, and Barnet runs it well. Barnet had a fumble problem last year but he's clearly a better leader and players responded to him better, it was obvious. The O-line didn't play well but my god, jantz threw a floater straight into the TT secondary with no cyclone within 10 yards, that's not on the o-line that's a terrible qb at work. Barnet beat two ranked teams as starter, I'm pretty sure jantz would throw 2 interceptions in a high school game. At this point if our only offense is the zone read, let Barnet run it
    Jantz was not made available to the media last night, and that was CPR's call, and probably a good one. JB may be the better option, but ISU's play calling, offensive line, and receivers did absolutely NOTHING to help Jantz last night. I'm not convinced JB would of had more success then Jantz did last night.



  5. #5
    Pro
    Points: 67,195, Level: 80
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 855
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    TXCyclones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Heath, TX
    Posts
    3,229
    Points
    67,195
    Level
    80
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 269
    Given: 219

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Quote Originally Posted by CyDude16 View Post
    *Barnett is not a better option.

    If he was there wouldn't be any reason why he's splitting time now with the 2's now with Richardson if he was still a better option.
    I think this is not necessarily true. SJ is CPR's man. He seems to want to make him be successful even if at his own peril. JB has at least won B12 games; SJ has not and will not.


    Remember, you're unique. Just like everyone else.

  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 161,086, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    GMackey32's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ames Via Cedar Falls
    Posts
    5,144
    Points
    161,086
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 190
    Given: 118

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Quote Originally Posted by chuckd4735 View Post
    Jantz was not made available to the media last night, and that was CPR's call, and probably a good one. JB may be the better option, but ISU's play calling, offensive line, and receivers did absolutely NOTHING to help Jantz last night. I'm not convinced JB would of had more success then Jantz did last night.

    This over and over again. Jantz wasn't exactly put into a situation to succeed last night. Barnett wouldn't have been successful last night either.


    Quote Originally Posted by johnnydugouts View Post
    MM and gesell are pretty much a wash. is niang a better player than woodbury? of course, but that doesnt mean its a good matchup for him, especially with a much more athletic defensive player backing up woodbury.


  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 129,197, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranRecommendation Second Class

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Bondurant
    Posts
    8,042
    Points
    129,197
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 224
    Given: 115

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Who started the rumor about Richardson and Barnett splitting reps?



  8. #8
    Legend
    Points: 316,896, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranOverdrive

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    My Playhouse
    Posts
    13,233
    Points
    316,896
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,673
    Given: 788

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Richardson is the better option. Hodge and Lanning are going to be better QB's than Barnett, so it's up to Richardson to see what he can do. Barnett is great on his feet, but no one can trust him throwing the ball.


    RANDOM THOUGHTS THREAD HATE CLUB OFFICIAL MEMBER

  9. #9
    Rookie
    Points: 8,578, Level: 27
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 172
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    526
    Points
    8,578
    Level
    27
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Quote Originally Posted by TXCyclones View Post
    I think this is not necessarily true. SJ is CPR's man. He seems to want to make him be successful even if at his own peril. JB has at least won B12 games; SJ has not and will not.
    SJ does seem to be CPR's man. I'm worried he's not objective when it comes to SJ's performance.



  10. #10
    Addict
    Points: 95,818, Level: 96
    Level completed: 39%, Points required for next Level: 1,232
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    xboxfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,371
    Points
    95,818
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 259
    Given: 458

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Steele is the best QB ISU has. If he wasn't, he wouldn't be starting. So as bad as you all think he is, he is still not as bad as Jared Barnett.



  11. #11
    Speechless
    Points: 271,842, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    isuno1fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Clive, Iowa
    Posts
    17,539
    Points
    271,842
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 169
    Given: 38

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Quote Originally Posted by ISUCubswin View Post
    Richardson is the better option. Hodge and Lanning are going to be better QB's than Barnett, so it's up to Richardson to see what he can do. Barnett is great on his feet, but no one can trust him throwing the ball.
    HA!..I think you mean no one can trust Steele throwing the ball.



  12. #12
    Rookie
    Points: 8,578, Level: 27
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 172
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    526
    Points
    8,578
    Level
    27
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Quote Originally Posted by GMackey32 View Post
    This over and over again. Jantz wasn't exactly put into a situation to succeed last night. Barnett wouldn't have been successful last night either.
    Perhaps, but it's hard to imagine the O performing any worse with Barnett at the helm. Something new needs to be tried...



  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 161,086, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    GMackey32's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ames Via Cedar Falls
    Posts
    5,144
    Points
    161,086
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 190
    Given: 118

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Quote Originally Posted by isuno1fan View Post
    HA!..I think you mean no one can trust Steele throwing the ball.

    Or just holding onto it in general. That fumble was atrocious.


    Quote Originally Posted by johnnydugouts View Post
    MM and gesell are pretty much a wash. is niang a better player than woodbury? of course, but that doesnt mean its a good matchup for him, especially with a much more athletic defensive player backing up woodbury.


  14. #14
    Legend
    Points: 169,675, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyguytillidie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    10,637
    Points
    169,675
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 133
    Given: 246

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Holy shat... 5 of the top 6 threads are about Barnett.



  15. #15
    Legend
    Points: 279,500, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialOverdriveCreated Album picturesVeteran
    Cy$'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    14,304
    Points
    279,500
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 763
    Given: 1,122

    Re: Why Barnet is the better option

    Quote Originally Posted by GoSTATE71 View Post
    Each qb won 3 games last year, Barnet won games against big 12 teams and jantz well it takes miracles to win games with him. Jantz didn't even show up to the press conference last night he just left after the game and that makes me mad. Our only offense is the zone read, and Barnet runs it well. Barnet had a fumble problem last year but he's clearly a better leader and players responded to him better, it was obvious. The O-line didn't play well but my god, jantz threw a floater straight into the TT secondary with no cyclone within 10 yards, that's not on the o-line that's a terrible qb at work. Barnet beat two ranked teams as starter, I'm pretty sure jantz would throw 2 interceptions in a high school game. At this point if our only offense is the zone read, let Barnet run it
    if this is true, this is really disturbing. Not what our QB should do after any game no matter how ****** he played.


    **2014 CRZZZFFL REGULAR SEASON CHAMPION***

    "I’d rather f------ work at McDonald’s than work with some of those guys. Not that there is anything bad about working at McDonald’s.” - Bo Pelini

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.tv
  • HOOPS: Iowa State vs. Mississippi Valley State
  • December 31, 2014
  • 06:00 PM