Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Addict
    Points: 157,483, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocial1 year registered
    Cycl1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    North Liberty
    Posts
    6,582
    Points
    157,483
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 77
    Given: 3

    Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    I have a pair of nike free runs from back before they started putting numbers on them, but they look and feel much like the current 5.0s do. I am thinking about moving to the 3.0s for my upcoming marathon, and using my old ones for the shorter runs so i can rotate shoes while training.

    Has anyone else made this switch? How did it work for you? I dont want to switch (and spend $90) and find i cant run long distances in the 3.0s.


    I LIEK CHOCOLATE MILK - The Partisan Bat

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisMWilliams View Post
    Hmmm...I'm not a huge "weiner"
    Quote Originally Posted by Angie View Post
    "Yeah, Chris' weiner is a way bigger get than mine."

  2. #2
    All-Star
    Points: 65,257, Level: 79
    Level completed: 26%, Points required for next Level: 1,193
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    isubeatle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    1,328
    Points
    65,257
    Level
    79
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 9
    Given: 47

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycl1 View Post
    I have a pair of nike free runs from back before they started putting numbers on them, but they look and feel much like the current 5.0s do. I am thinking about moving to the 3.0s for my upcoming marathon, and using my old ones for the shorter runs so i can rotate shoes while training.

    Has anyone else made this switch? How did it work for you? I dont want to switch (and spend $90) and find i cant run long distances in the 3.0s.

    Unless you don't like your current ones/5.0s, I wouldn't switch.

    if you're looking for something different, i went from the nike free run 5.0 to these and will never look back.

    Brooks PureCadence: Feel more with less



  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 115,838, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Cybyassociation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    6,035
    Points
    115,838
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 132
    Given: 112

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    I second that. Once I went from Nike to Brooks, I'll never go back.



  4. #4
    Addict
    Points: 72,593, Level: 83
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 557
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    5,034
    Points
    72,593
    Level
    83
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 84
    Given: 115

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    I actually upgraded to the Nike Free 7.0 and absolutely love them because they have more lateral support and just as light weight. However, I don't run marathons and I don't know how you could do it with 3.0


    "We are first and foremost an educational institution that values integrity, honesty and treating others with fairness and respect".

    -ISU President Gregory Geoffroy; circa May 2003.

  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 143,178, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    WhatchaGonnaDo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    5,147
    Points
    143,178
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 331
    Given: 204

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    I gave up on Nike a long time ago. I'm an asics man



  6. #6
    Pro
    Points: 52,469, Level: 70
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 81
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Tank's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Niceville, FL
    Posts
    2,279
    Points
    52,469
    Level
    70
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 7
    Given: 13

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by isubeatle View Post
    Unless you don't like your current ones/5.0s, I wouldn't switch.

    if you're looking for something different, i went from the nike free run 5.0 to these and will never look back.

    Brooks PureCadence: Feel more with less

    +1

    I only run in Brooks or Saucony now.



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 442,293, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    23,928
    Points
    442,293
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 191
    Given: 25

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Go2Guy View Post
    I actually upgraded to the Nike Free 7.0 and absolutely love them because they have more lateral support and just as light weight. However, I don't run marathons and I don't know how you could do it with 3.0
    I ran the Des Moines Marathon in Frees. Not sure I'd ever try it again.

    Though there isn't a shoe on earth which leaves your feet feeling fine after 26.2 miles of running.



  8. #8
    Rookie
    Points: 12,974, Level: 34
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 376
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    fwiw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    388
    Points
    12,974
    Level
    34
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3
    Given: 3

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    I've been a recreational runner for 15+ years years and have gone through many different brands and models.

    Everyone is different, but if you don't pronate and are okay with a mid-or forefoot strike, it's hard to go wrong with either the Brooks Pure Flow or Cadence. I have the Pure Flow and it's my all time favorite, but my max distance in it is a half marathon.

    The Cadence has a little more stability so might be a better choice for the marathon. They'll set you back about $120 I think -- try them out at your local running store if they'll let you (not sure what's around the CR/Iowa City area).



  9. #9
    Pro
    Points: 37,728, Level: 59
    Level completed: 90%, Points required for next Level: 122
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience Points
    HOTDON's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Fort Dodge, IA
    Posts
    2,391
    Points
    37,728
    Level
    59
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by IcSyU View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Go2Guy View Post
    I actually upgraded to the Nike Free 7.0 and absolutely love them because they have more lateral support and just as light weight. However, I don't run marathons and I don't know how you could do it with 3.0
    I ran the Des Moines Marathon in Frees. Not sure I'd ever try it again.Though there isn't a shoe on earth which leaves your feet feeling fine after 26.2 miles of running.
    I would respectfully disagree. My Vomero 4's were super cushy, and my feet felt great after my marathon. Quads, hamstrings, etc. were wrecked, but none of the foot pain I assumed I would have. The newer Vomeros have been disappointing, and I've moved on from Nike, but they were the right shoe for me at that time.

    Take your time looking and get fitted. It's worth it given how much stress you will be subjecting your feet to, not just in the event, but in all the training leading up to the event. Don't be afraid to look outside your favorite brand. There are a number of great manufacturers.

    Plenty of people just power through ill fitting shoes, or simply don't understand how much science goes into a pair of shoes. Sometimes you're lucky enough to slip on something that happens to suit your gait, or maybe you're neutral enough that most shoes are fine. For me, it's not worth the chance of injury to avoid doing a little research. Hell, as an engineer I really can't help myself, but to each his own.

    For the record, I bought a pair of Frees right when they came out and loved running in them, but I never ran more than 5 miles at that point. I'm also a little heavier runner than I was then, despite running more miles now. Shoe fit has become a lot more critical beyond 30.



  10. #10
    All-Star
    Points: 37,272, Level: 59
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 578
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    letsCYber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    U.S. of A.
    Posts
    1,384
    Points
    37,272
    Level
    59
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 31
    Given: 14

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycl1 View Post
    I have a pair of nike free runs from back before they started putting numbers on them, but they look and feel much like the current 5.0s do. I am thinking about moving to the 3.0s for my upcoming marathon, and using my old ones for the shorter runs so i can rotate shoes while training.

    Has anyone else made this switch? How did it work for you? I dont want to switch (and spend $90) and find i cant run long distances in the 3.0s.
    I go to taco bell when I want free runs.


    a/s/l?

  11. #11
    Mariner Moose
    Points: 60,416, Level: 76
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 1,234
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    no2cyclones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Davenport, IA
    Posts
    3,327
    Points
    60,416
    Level
    76
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 181
    Given: 588

    Re: Nike Free Runs: 5.0 vs 3.0

    Quote Originally Posted by Cycl1 View Post
    I have a pair of nike free runs from back before they started putting numbers on them, but they look and feel much like the current 5.0s do. I am thinking about moving to the 3.0s for my upcoming marathon, and using my old ones for the shorter runs so i can rotate shoes while training.

    Has anyone else made this switch? How did it work for you? I dont want to switch (and spend $90) and find i cant run long distances in the 3.0s.
    Go to Running Wild, in Coralville. I can't recommend this highly enough. They are almost completely staffed by Exercise Science majors from the University of Iowa, and they absolutely know what they are talking about. They have you walk barefoot over a lengthy stretch, observing your pronation/supination and muscle movement in the lower legs, then make recommendations on different types of shoes for the distances that you're interested in running. Definitely worth the time.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 07:00 PM