Page 36 of 209 FirstFirst ... 263233343536373839404686136 ... LastLast
Results 526 to 540 of 3126
  1. #526
    All-Star
    Points: 37,596, Level: 59
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 254
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    BloodyBuddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1,513
    Points
    37,596
    Level
    59
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 68
    Given: 19

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    So reading the WV forum, there is a rumor that ESPN is willing to renegotiate the ACC contract if they sign a GOR.

    That could put a hold on expansion for quite a while.



  2. #527
    Speechless
    Points: 560,156, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranRecommendation Second Class
    ISUAgronomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in Iowa!!!!!!!!
    Posts
    21,360
    Points
    560,156
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 196
    Given: 123

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Quote Originally Posted by BloodyBuddy View Post
    So reading the WV forum, there is a rumor that ESPN is willing to renegotiate the ACC contract if they sign a GOR.

    That could put a hold on expansion for quite a while.
    Teams have to be willing to sign it though. ACC teams have options available right now, which is probably the reason ACC admin want to push a GOR.




  3. #528
    Rookie
    Points: 10,808, Level: 31
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 442
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    ArgentCy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    544
    Points
    10,808
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 51
    Given: 29

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Yep I saw that rumor as well. This really is a heavyweight contest with ESPN throwing billions of dollars around like its confetti. I really have to wonder how that will work out for them in 5-10 years. This could just be the last gasp "blow-off" top in the market which is a common way for markets to end many years of expansion.

    Anyway, I think that this is the real reason the conferences will go through major turmoil until the 2014 season. Commissioners to discuss 'access' bowl limit and revenue sharing, sources say - ESPN "The biggest difference in the revenue distribution, compared to the current BCS system, is that starting in 2014, five conferences -- the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and ACC -- will receive the biggest slices of the revenue. In the current BCS system, the six automatic qualifying BCS leagues, those five plus the Big East, received the lion's share of the revenue.

    The commissioners reached that decision based on several factors, including the BCS rankings of the conferences since 1998 based on the conference's 2014 membership. For example, the Big 12 gets credit for West Virginia and TCU's past BCS rankings, the Big Ten gets credit for Nebraska, the SEC gets credit for Texas A&M and Missouri, the ACC gets credit for Miami, Virginia Tech, Boston College, Pittsburgh and Syracuse, the Pac-12 for Utah and Colorado and the Big East gets credit for Boise State, Houston and UCF. The Mountain West and Conference USA also get credit for their new members.

    Using those cumulative rankings, based on 2014 membership, for the top 25 final BCS rankings since 1998, there is a huge disparity between the power five leagues and the Group of Five conferences.
    Awarding 25 points for first place, 24 for second, etc., for those annual rankings, the SEC ranks first with 1,054 points, followed by the Big Ten (860), Big 12 (816), ACC (673) and Pac-12 (671). Then there's a huge drop to the Group of Five -- the Big East (240), C-USA (49), MWC (58), Mid-American (21) and Sun Belt (0)."

    That was from the ESPN article. Now go threw and start adding subtraction points that an FSU or Clemson or Maryland (probably not many but BiG is safely second already). We also saw today that ESPN is paying what $470 million per year for the playoff. What sounds better to the conferences $470 million / 5 the current alignment or perhaps adding a couple teams to knock the ACC out and split the $470 million / 4 ways. Now, the Big XII looks pretty good but not entirely safe in third. $470 / 4 = $117.5 / 10 teams - $11.75 mil per team plus or minus. If they could add two teams with relatively good football finishes since 1998 like FSU, Clemson, or perhaps Louisville then you boost your standings and only split the proceeds four ways. Therefore I think it really strengthens the conference if BIG and/or SEC take a couple more ACC teams like Va Tech, NC State, or others that have finished in the top 25 in past years.



  4. #529
    Speechless
    Points: 398,619, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 67.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    58,793
    Points
    398,619
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 551
    Given: 349
    Let my Fred's Posse Ride: Georges, Naz, Hogue, Bryce, Nader, Monte, Matt, and McKay.

  5. #530
    Walk On
    Points: 4,028, Level: 18
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 222
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    128
    Points
    4,028
    Level
    18
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Quote Originally Posted by HandSanitizer View Post
    IF, and I mean IF we are for some reason forced to go to 16. I would also laugh if we ended up with Florida State, Clemson, West Virginia, Notre Dame, Louisville, and some other left over ACC team (NC State etc.)
    I would want to still play KU, KSU and keep a texas presence though And keep the same or add money to our pocket. I couldn't even begin to figure pods with this....erggg.
    Can't we all just play nice? Its like watching a reality show.

    If we do go to 16 and those are the teams, what they should do is have a revolving western division. Each team in the west plays in the eastern division once every 9 years. You get 8 years in a row in the west so we all keep our ties to the schools we've been together with and then do one year of duty in the east to get to know those teams better and then you're right back in the west for 8 more consecutive years.



  6. #531
    Addict
    Points: 43,375, Level: 64
    Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 875
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    scyclonekid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    5,099
    Points
    43,375
    Level
    64
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 48
    Given: 4

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    keep it at 10 or go to twelve, I really like the round robin call me crazy. The round robin makes this conference a lot more interesting week in and week out.



  7. #532
    Rookie
    Points: 10,808, Level: 31
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 442
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    ArgentCy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    544
    Points
    10,808
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 51
    Given: 29

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Ok so I am bored and don't want to be doing the work I should be so I went ahead and ran the totals on most current ACC teams. It was also disheartening to not see ISU once finish in the top 25 :(

    The results are a little surprising
    Virginia Tech - 163
    Miami (fl) - 131 cough*bunch of cheaters*
    Florida State - 121
    Georgia Tech - 56
    Clemson - 33 (really?)
    Virginia - 28
    Boston College - 21
    Pittsburgh - 20
    Maryland - 19
    Wake Forest - 12
    Syracuse - 11
    North Carolina - 0
    Duke - 0
    North Carolina State - 0

    I added Wake, Cuse, and Pitt but I'm about 50 points short so i missed a couple somewhere.

    I also ran Louisville just to see
    Louisville - 43

    So, if Virgina Tech and FSU leave or perhaps Ga Tech and one other team I don't see how ACC could hope to retain that top 5 "elite" conference and the share of playoff money.


    Last edited by ArgentCy; 11-21-2012 at 09:25 PM.

  8. #533
    Addict
    Points: 122,178, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    simply1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    5,479
    Points
    122,178
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 57
    Given: 6

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    This stuff just turns me off of college football to some extent, do not like.


    I don't do signatures. Blondes, brunettes, and red heads are a different story.

  9. #534
    Speechless
    Points: 406,218, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    alarson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    21,176
    Points
    406,218
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 338
    Given: 140

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Quote Originally Posted by scyclonekid View Post
    keep it at 10 or go to twelve, I really like the round robin call me crazy. The round robin makes this conference a lot more interesting week in and week out.
    It also hurts this conference, week in and week out.



  10. #535
    Pro
    Points: 42,364, Level: 63
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 586
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered25000 Experience Points
    IAStubborn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    2,920
    Points
    42,364
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 260
    Given: 100

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Quote Originally Posted by DistrictCyclone View Post
    The big flaw in Silver's methodology (using Google search volume as a proxy for the number of football fans in a media market) is that it assumes fans of each football team have equal access to a computer and the internet. If you've ever been to the Florida panhandle, you'd know this was not the case...some of those yokels wouldn't know what a computer was if you dropped it on the hood of their El Camino. Hence why it looks as if FSU has relatively few fans.

    Semi-
    he uses google for fan intensity along with the unscientific survey data for geographical range...he admits its a very blunt measurement but the best data available. Georgia tech is grossly over estimated because it attributes the atlanta market to them, when most in atlanta would say that georgia is still the dominate team there. Also, brand value to networks is not equated in this which is valuable tobig 12 since we arent worried about cable subscriptions. Networks dont care about fans as much as is that a team people will watch if there team isnt playing. ISU's stock has certainly risen in this arena since osu..



  11. #536
    Pro
    Points: 33,381, Level: 56
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 869
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    kilroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    hills to flat lands
    Posts
    2,315
    Points
    33,381
    Level
    56
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 30
    Given: 22

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Quote Originally Posted by JayhawkScott View Post
    If we do go to 16 and those are the teams, what they should do is have a revolving western division. Each team in the west plays in the eastern division once every 9 years. You get 8 years in a row in the west so we all keep our ties to the schools we've been together with and then do one year of duty in the east to get to know those teams better and then you're right back in the west for 8 more consecutive years.
    But even at 16 would the conferences be stable enough to stay together long enough to reach full rotation back and forth?


    I'm not trying to be difficult, it comes naturally....

  12. #537
    Pro
    Points: 52,188, Level: 70
    Level completed: 75%, Points required for next Level: 362
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    HoopsTournament's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    St. Joseph, MO
    Posts
    2,599
    Points
    52,188
    Level
    70
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 248
    Given: 291

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Quote Originally Posted by JayhawkScott View Post
    If we do go to 16 and those are the teams, what they should do is have a revolving western division. Each team in the west plays in the eastern division once every 9 years. You get 8 years in a row in the west so we all keep our ties to the schools we've been together with and then do one year of duty in the east to get to know those teams better and then you're right back in the west for 8 more consecutive years.
    How do you choose which teams move to the other division because if all teams move to the other division, then you basically just changed division names and not opponents?

    For 16 teams, you have to do pods playing 3 games against teams in your pod and playing an entire different pod (pod #2). You would also have a dedicated rival from pod 3 for conference game #8. Conference game #9 will be determined by the standings and will be against someone from pod 4 (all played Thanksgiving weekend). The #1 teams for conference game #9 would be the semifinal game and the winners play for conference championship.

    So for example if the following teams joined: Clemson, Florida State, Louisville, GaTech, Cincinnati, Brigham Young

    You could have the following pods:

    1
    Iowa State
    Kansas
    Kansas State
    Brigham Young

    2
    Oklahoma
    Oklahoma State
    Texas
    Texas Tech

    3
    Texas Christian
    Baylor
    Cincinnati
    Georgia Tech

    4
    West Virginia
    Florida State
    Clemson
    Louisville

    (Teams and Divisions are for illustrative purposes)

    Iowa State would have a rival from each pod (for example - Oklahoma State, Baylor and Louisville - once again illustrative)

    Year 1 - play 3 schools in pod
    Play pod 2
    Play Baylor
    Play team in Pod 4 that finishes in same position (pod 1 hosts) - #1 teams game is the semifinal game and winner plays in championship

    Year 2 - play 3 schools in pod
    play pod 3
    Play Louisville
    Play team in pod 2 that finishes in same position (pod 2 hosts)

    Year 3 - play 3 schools in pod
    play pod 4
    Play Oklahoma State
    Play team in pod 1 that finishes in same position (pod 1 hosts)

    Years 4 to 6 - just reverse the location of Years 1 to 3

    This would mean we would play in 6 years:
    Teams in pod 6 times
    Rivals in other pods 4 times
    Non Rivals in other pods 2 times
    6 games based on finish - 2 from each pod

    This guarantees that the 9th game will not be a rematch, allows you to play everyone at least every 3 years, and solves the problem of having a semifinal and championship being two extra games instead of just one extra.



  13. #538
    Addict
    Points: 148,047, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 43.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CyFan61's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    The Southeast
    Posts
    7,719
    Points
    148,047
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 625
    Given: 186

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    I would be happy to see the ACC add Louisville, sign a GOR, and end this round of realignment. ACC, B1G, and SEC can enjoy their 14-team conferences... we are good with 10.

    It would be even better if they added UConn rather than Louisville, though... just in case we wanted to expand at some point...



  14. #539
    Addict
    Points: 84,270, Level: 90
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 1,280
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ripvdub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sk-Ankeny
    Posts
    6,797
    Points
    84,270
    Level
    90
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 54
    Given: 157

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Wish we would've taken Louisville instead of tcu, a lil late i guess.


    #BEATIOWA

  15. #540
    Starter
    Points: 11,125, Level: 31
    Level completed: 83%, Points required for next Level: 125
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    San Angelo, Texas
    Posts
    723
    Points
    11,125
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 85
    Given: 26

    Re: ***OFFICIAL BIG 12 EXPANSION THREAD 2.0***

    Quote Originally Posted by HoopsTournament View Post
    How do you choose which teams move to the other division because if all teams move to the other division, then you basically just changed division names and not opponents?

    For 16 teams, you have to do pods playing 3 games against teams in your pod and playing an entire different pod (pod #2). You would also have a dedicated rival from pod 3 for conference game #8. Conference game #9 will be determined by the standings and will be against someone from pod 4 (all played Thanksgiving weekend). The #1 teams for conference game #9 would be the semifinal game and the winners play for conference championship.

    So for example if the following teams joined: Clemson, Florida State, Louisville, GaTech, Cincinnati, Brigham Young

    You could have the following pods:

    1
    Iowa State
    Kansas
    Kansas State
    Brigham Young

    2
    Oklahoma
    Oklahoma State
    Texas
    Texas Tech

    3
    Texas Christian
    Baylor
    Cincinnati
    Georgia Tech

    4
    West Virginia
    Florida State
    Clemson
    Louisville

    (Teams and Divisions are for illustrative purposes)

    Iowa State would have a rival from each pod (for example - Oklahoma State, Baylor and Louisville - once again illustrative)

    Year 1 - play 3 schools in pod
    Play pod 2
    Play Baylor
    Play team in Pod 4 that finishes in same position (pod 1 hosts) - #1 teams game is the semifinal game and winner plays in championship

    Year 2 - play 3 schools in pod
    play pod 3
    Play Louisville
    Play team in pod 2 that finishes in same position (pod 2 hosts)

    Year 3 - play 3 schools in pod
    play pod 4
    Play Oklahoma State
    Play team in pod 1 that finishes in same position (pod 1 hosts)

    Years 4 to 6 - just reverse the location of Years 1 to 3

    This would mean we would play in 6 years:
    Teams in pod 6 times
    Rivals in other pods 4 times
    Non Rivals in other pods 2 times
    6 games based on finish - 2 from each pod

    This guarantees that the 9th game will not be a rematch, allows you to play everyone at least every 3 years, and solves the problem of having a semifinal and championship being two extra games instead of just one extra.

    I know its just an example, but can everyone leave BYU out of all their future examples please? It just doesn't fit any way you slice it. I'd take friggin Kent State over BYU...



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: FOX
  • Iowa State vs. Baylor
  • September 27, 2014
  • 07:20 PM