Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 13,382, Level: 35
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 668
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    302
    Points
    13,382
    Level
    35
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 3

    How to find the new #1 in College Football

    http://www.desmoinesregister.com/art...nclick_check=1

    to bad they don't write more articles like this one.



  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 717,814, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    A pineapple under the sea
    Posts
    45,688
    Points
    717,814
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 467
    Given: 245

    Re:How to find the new #1 in College Football

    Still not a fan of only four, but I would like a top four playoff a thousand times more than a voted plus one. That's just an invitation to further problems.



  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 147,924, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 36.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    HFCS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    9,629
    Points
    147,924
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 269
    Given: 119

    Re: How to find the new #1 in College Football

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclonepride View Post
    Still not a fan of only four, but I would like a top four playoff a thousand times more than a voted plus one. That's just an invitation to further problems.
    The people involved who favor a plus one voting system are basically saying "My team or conference SUCKS so we hope we can luck out and get voted in so we only have to win one game".

    I can kind of respect wanting requiring all or some of the teams to be conference champs even though I don't agree with it, but a voted plus 1 is just complete cowardice and nonsensical.



  4. #4
    Pro
    Points: 71,528, Level: 83
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 1,622
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    SNEDDS3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    2,361
    Points
    71,528
    Level
    83
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 16
    Given: 7

    Re: How to find the new #1 in College Football

    Quote Originally Posted by Transient View Post
    http://www.desmoinesregister.com/art...nclick_check=1

    too bad they don't write more articles like this one.
    yep


    *Rest in peace corn dog chick

    "what you dont know is that treehouse masters is just mansions for WVU fans"


    CF Fantasy Football Champ 2013


  5. #5
    Rookie
    Points: 7,441, Level: 25
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 109
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    KidSilverhair's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Five Seasons?
    Posts
    352
    Points
    7,441
    Level
    25
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: How to find the new #1 in College Football

    Quote Originally Posted by HFCS View Post
    The people involved who favor a plus one voting system are basically saying "My team or conference SUCKS so we hope we can luck out and get voted in so we only have to win one game".

    I can kind of respect wanting requiring all or some of the teams to be conference champs even though I don't agree with it, but a voted plus 1 is just complete cowardice and nonsensical.
    Well, whoever gets voted into a plus-one championship game would still have to had won their bowl game, so this isn't entirely true. The issue of who they played in that bowl game, however, certainly is still a huge factor (beating Cincinnati or Connecticut in your bowl game is going to be a whole different experience than beating USC or LSU, for example).

    I do agree with you in general ... don't care for the plus-one model, I can see some sense in the idea of requiring a conference title to play for the national title ... but I don't think a plus-one is complete cowardice. Just partial.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 06:00 PM