Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 117
  1. #1
    Recruit
    Points: 5,288, Level: 21
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 262
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    110
    Points
    5,288
    Level
    21
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Big 12 sucking in the dance

    hate to admit it, but the Big 10 was a much better conference this year.



  2. #2
    Starter
    Points: 21,861, Level: 45
    Level completed: 24%, Points required for next Level: 689
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    627
    Points
    21,861
    Level
    45
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Quote Originally Posted by cloneiac View Post
    hate to admit it, but the Big 10 was a much better conference this year.
    Kinda hard to judge when the B10 played vs lower seeds compared to the B 12. But lol @ Mizzu, did you know they are in the SEC?



  3. #3
    Starter
    Points: 18,043, Level: 40
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 7
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CONEClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    798
    Points
    18,043
    Level
    40
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    The Big XII has won all the games they were supposed to win and lost all the games they were supposed to lose. Not sure how that's defined as sucking

    *Missouri = SEC. Not Big XII.



  4. #4
    All-Star
    Points: 32,198, Level: 55
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 852
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,292
    Points
    32,198
    Level
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 319
    Given: 139

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Quote Originally Posted by cloneiac View Post
    hate to admit it, but the Big 10 was a much better conference this year.
    Michigan won a share of the Big 10 title, and they lost to Ohio.

    Iowa State and Kansas State both had to play #1s second round, so it's hard to say it's "sucking" that they didn't win.

    Texas was on the bubble in the first place and only got in because we choked.

    Missouri, well, yeah, that one is a mystery.



  5. #5
    All-Star
    Points: 28,416, Level: 51
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 234
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    driegner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,136
    Points
    28,416
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 3

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Well, ISU and KSU got knocked out by 1 seeds. Mizzou is an SEC team. Baylor and KU are still playing. Texas lost to a great Cincy team.

    So far the only Big 12 team to lose in an upset is Mizzery. I think the Big Ten is very good this year, but I don't think you can cite the tourney as proof.



  6. #6
    Speechless
    Points: 592,236, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranRecommendation Second Class
    ISUAgronomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Close Enough, IA
    Posts
    22,368
    Points
    592,236
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,245
    Given: 687

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Quote Originally Posted by cloneiac View Post
    Blackmon is good but I think McNutt is better.

    Undercover hawk...Mr. cloneIAC(ity)





  7. #7
    Legend
    Points: 154,051, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    13,057
    Points
    154,051
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,234
    Given: 2,432

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Quote Originally Posted by cloneiac View Post
    hate to admit it, but the Big 10 was a much better conference this year.
    I don't know whether it's true or not, but I do know as far as guessing brackets, the following is a good guideline, on average:

    1. B!G teams advance further than their capability suggests.

    2. Big XII is the opposite.



  8. #8
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 94,733, Level: 95
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 317
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Die4Cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    4,552
    Points
    94,733
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,451
    Given: 1,401

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Benefits of seeding. No seeds lower than #4, except for Purdue, which can benefit from being a #10 instead of an 8/9 when they get into the second round. But the Beakers will have something to say about it. Their match ups to this point have been easier, obviously. The Big 12 had two teams face #1 seeds in their second round. Texas barely met the qualifications to be in the tourney at all this year, and obviously Missouri wet the bed. Baylor continues to play well in spite of HC Scott Drew.



  9. #9
    Legend
    Points: 154,051, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    13,057
    Points
    154,051
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,234
    Given: 2,432

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Addition: It explains why I picked (10) Purdue over (2) Kansas in two-thirds of my brackets.

    I may end up being wrong, but it seemed completely plausible when I did it.



  10. #10
    Legend
    Points: 154,051, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    13,057
    Points
    154,051
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,234
    Given: 2,432

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Big Ten seems to have a more consistent identity with teams that routinely make the tournament.

    Izzo is entrenched at MSU, and his teams rarely play below seeding. (The George Mason season is an exception)

    Matta has done OK, but not superbly — reliable in the tournament.

    Ryan's teams are the most faceless among frequent Sweet 16 teams on the planet, but it still happens. It's like Olsen-era Arizona without the loaded rosters. Or Gillespie-era A&M with better seeding.

    I think Big Ten does better among teams that aren't seeded highly (4 or 5 and downward); Big 12 does OK if teams are among top 4 or 5 seeds (with the exception of '01 — geesh. Look that one up, if you can stomach it)



  11. #11
    Rookie
    Points: 19,569, Level: 42
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 281
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    BigCojones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    592
    Points
    19,569
    Level
    42
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 143
    Given: 36

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Quote Originally Posted by cloneiac View Post
    hate to admit it, but the Big 10 was a much better conference this year.
    Your posting rights should be revoked since you don't know WTH you are talking about. Or your just an undercover Hawk fan.

    Wisconsin and Indiana's next games are against the teams that just knocked out ISU and KSU with out Samuals, arguably their best player. IF they win those then I can agree with you. If they lose them it just means due to their over seeding they got one more easy game then ISU and KSU got.

    If Pudue beats KU then you will be correct. If they don't. It doesnt mean a whole lot due to the seeding.



  12. #12
    Pro
    Points: 41,766, Level: 63
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 1,184
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Cyhart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    3,130
    Points
    41,766
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 155
    Given: 11

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    I agree with the other posters that a lot of it has to do with seeding.
    I really feel like ISU would still be dancing if we had played anyone else besides that pro team from Lexington.


    "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion man"

  13. #13
    Speechless
    Points: 544,315, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 69.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    jdoggivjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sterling Heights, MI
    Posts
    39,663
    Points
    544,315
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,932
    Given: 2,952

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    "The Big 10 has only done better in the tournament because of seeding."

    Well, yeah - they got better seeding because overall the Big 10 is a better conference than the Big 12. I don't get why people just can't admit this.


    "That's what I do. I drink, and I know things." - Tyrion Lannister

    "Success is just failure that hasn't happened yet." - life advice from Latrell Spreewell


  14. #14
    Pro
    Points: 41,766, Level: 63
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 1,184
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Cyhart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    3,130
    Points
    41,766
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 155
    Given: 11

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    "The Big 10 has only done better in the tournament because of seeding."

    Well, yeah - they got better seeding because overall the Big 10 is a better conference than the Big 12. I don't get why people just can't admit this.
    Hard to admit something that isn't true.


    "Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion man"

  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 84,254, Level: 90
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 1,296
    Overall activity: 34.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    8,454
    Points
    84,254
    Level
    90
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,336
    Given: 285

    Re: Big 12 sucking in the dance

    This thread reminds me of B10 fans defending their conference's poor bowl performances by complaining that they have tougher matchups.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBA
  • Football Season Opener vs. UNI
  • September 3, 2016
  • 07:00 PM