Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 24,860, Level: 48
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 690
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    1,432
    Points
    24,860
    Level
    48
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 73

    Lunardi's Bracketology

    How does he expect anybody to take him serious when he has Colorado as his "next four out" 8 hours AFTER they win the conference and are a lock? I understand some of these guys dont have the time or resources but this is supposed to be one of the leading sites for the field predictions and he misses this badly?



  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 265,889, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsCreated Album pictures
    BryceC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    17,216
    Points
    265,889
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 458
    Given: 0

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    He only updates it on Mondays as far as I know. He doesn't do it every day.




  3. #3
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 8,006, Level: 26
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 144
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    JoshTheCyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Fort Dodge
    Posts
    327
    Points
    8,006
    Level
    26
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 27
    Given: 200

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by BryceC View Post
    He only updates it on Mondays as far as I know. He doesn't do it every day.
    He's been updating it daily for championship week, maybe even more often.



  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 518,556, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    jdoggivjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sterling Heights, MI
    Posts
    35,845
    Points
    518,556
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,282
    Given: 1,665

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    How does he expect anybody to take him serious when he has Colorado as his "next four out" 8 hours AFTER they win the conference and are a lock? I understand some of these guys dont have the time or resources but this is supposed to be one of the leading sites for the field predictions and he misses this badly?
    Lunardi's Bracketology as of 12:25 am this morning:

    2012 Bracketology - College Basketball Nation Blog - ESPN

    TOP SEED ORDER

    Kentucky
    Syracuse
    North Carolina
    Kansas

    Next in line (in order): Michigan State, Ohio State, Missouri, Duke

    LAST FOUR IN

    South Florida
    North Carolina State
    Seton Hall
    Mississippi State

    FIRST FOUR OUT

    Washington
    Drexel
    Iona
    Miami (Fla.)

    NEXT TWO OUT

    Ole Miss
    Arizona

    CONFERENCE BREAKDOWN

    Big East (10)
    Big Ten (6)
    Big 12 (6)
    ACC (5)
    SEC (5)
    Mountain West (4)
    Atlantic 10 (3)
    West Coast (3)
    Conference USA (2)
    Missouri Valley (2)
    Pac-12 (2)

    AUTOMATIC QUALIFIERS

    Belmont (Atlantic Sun)
    Colorado (Pac-12)
    Creighton (Missouri Valley)
    Davidson (Southern)
    Detroit (Horizon)
    Harvard (Ivy)
    Lamar (Southland)
    Lehigh (Patriot)
    LIU Brooklyn (Northeast)
    Long Beach State (Big West)
    Louisville (Big East)
    Loyola-Md. (MAAC)
    Memphis (Conference USA)
    Mississippi Valley State (SWAC)
    Missouri (Big 12)
    Montana (Big Sky)
    Murray State (OVC)
    New Mexico (Mountain West)
    New Mexico State (WAC)
    Norfolk State (MEAC)
    Ohio (MAC)
    Saint Mary's (West Coast)
    South Dakota State (Summit)
    UNC Asheville (Big South)
    Vermont (America East)
    VCU (Colonial)
    Western Kentucky (Sun Belt)

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueywqUBW3oM]YOU GOT FAIL HORN'D! - YouTube[/ame]


    Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice?
    Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.


  5. #5
    Speechless
    Points: 288,371, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    17,065
    Points
    288,371
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 517
    Given: 72

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    That hasn't been updated this morning.



  6. #6
    Rookie
    Points: 6,349, Level: 23
    Level completed: 60%, Points required for next Level: 201
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    365
    Points
    6,349
    Level
    23
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 13
    Given: 280

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    I am actually sick of Joe Lunardi.



  7. #7
    Starter
    Points: 12,281, Level: 33
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 369
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    leroycyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    852
    Points
    12,281
    Level
    33
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 19
    Given: 3

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    How does he expect anybody to take him serious when he has Colorado as his "next four out" 8 hours AFTER they win the conference and are a lock? I understand some of these guys dont have the time or resources but this is supposed to be one of the leading sites for the field predictions and he misses this badly?
    I have quickly learned that the pundits, Lunardi, Palm, are just tools. It's fun to read the bracketologies occasionally but they're not to be taken too seriously.

    LE said it best in his outburst that was highlighted with a link to the Marshall U site on CF. Computers do the work. He called the reporters "idiots." Reporters probably get their expertise from the pundits. LE knows a lot more than the pundits and the reporters.

    I would really enjoy being in Hilton tonight at 6:00pm but that can't happen, so I'll watch TV.

    I sure don't want the Cyclones drawing Cincinnati in the first game.



  8. #8
    Pro
    Points: 45,886, Level: 66
    Level completed: 24%, Points required for next Level: 1,064
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,036
    Points
    45,886
    Level
    66
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 67
    Given: 125

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Probably just an oversight.



  9. #9
    Speechless
    Points: 518,556, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 48.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    jdoggivjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sterling Heights, MI
    Posts
    35,845
    Points
    518,556
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,282
    Given: 1,665

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by megamanxzero35 View Post
    Probably just an oversight.
    Unless he posts a link showing us what he's referring to I'm assuming he's either flat out wrong or full of **** and just stirring the pot because what I linked and posted shows that at 12:25 AM ET he has Colorado as having the Pac 12 auto bid.

    I get that ESPN bashing is the popular thing to do around here, but if you're going to do so have your facts straight or at least link your evidence.


    Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice?
    Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.


  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 42,652, Level: 63
    Level completed: 78%, Points required for next Level: 298
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cincyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,963
    Points
    42,652
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 212
    Given: 599

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by megamanxzero35 View Post
    Probably just an oversight.
    Unless he posts a link showing us what he's referring to I'm assuming he's either flat out wrong or full of **** and just stirring the pot because what I linked and posted shows that at 12:25 AM ET he has Colorado as having the Pac 12 auto bid.I get that ESPN bashing is the popular thing to do around here, but if you're going to do so have your facts straight or at least link your evidence.
    +1



  11. #11
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 8,006, Level: 26
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 144
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    JoshTheCyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Fort Dodge
    Posts
    327
    Points
    8,006
    Level
    26
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 27
    Given: 200

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Nihawk View Post
    I am actually sick of Joe Lunardi.
    THIS. ^



  12. #12
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 140,793, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,509
    Points
    140,793
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by BryceC View Post
    He only updates it on Mondays as far as I know. He doesn't do it every day.
    he is on TV right now propping up the big 10 -- idiot



  13. #13
    All-Star
    Points: 28,524, Level: 51
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 126
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Clone96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    1,308
    Points
    28,524
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 104
    Given: 5

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    How does he expect anybody to take him serious when he has Colorado as his "next four out" 8 hours AFTER they win the conference and are a lock? I understand some of these guys dont have the time or resources but this is supposed to be one of the leading sites for the field predictions and he misses this badly?
    Um, you did see at the top it said "Updated, March 10", right?



  14. #14
    Pro
    Points: 62,162, Level: 77
    Level completed: 32%, Points required for next Level: 1,088
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cy4prez7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,775
    Points
    62,162
    Level
    77
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 143
    Given: 99

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Dislike him as much as you want but when it comes to his final bracket, he is very rarely wrong.


    KCCO



    Follow me on Twitter: @mjballman20

  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 81,201, Level: 88
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 749
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NYC/Chicago
    Posts
    6,587
    Points
    81,201
    Level
    88
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 201
    Given: 57

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Kansas State is now an 8 seed in his bracket and we're a 9. Not sure I agree with that one...considering we won 2 more conference games than them, 1 more overall win, they lost to Oklahoma twice, lost to us twice, took OT to beat NORTH FLORIDA.

    Must have something to do with the fact that both of their wins against the top 3 ranked in conference (Kansas, Mizzou, Baylor) were away.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.TV
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • September 5, 2015
  • 07:00 PM