Lunardi's Bracketology
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 24,315, Level: 47
    Level completed: 77%, Points required for next Level: 235
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    1,398
    Points
    24,315
    Level
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 52

    Lunardi's Bracketology

    How does he expect anybody to take him serious when he has Colorado as his "next four out" 8 hours AFTER they win the conference and are a lock? I understand some of these guys dont have the time or resources but this is supposed to be one of the leading sites for the field predictions and he misses this badly?



  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 261,284, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    BryceC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    16,872
    Points
    261,284
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 240
    Given: 0

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    He only updates it on Mondays as far as I know. He doesn't do it every day.




  3. #3
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 7,628, Level: 26
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 522
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience Points1 year registered
    JoshTheCyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Fort Dodge
    Posts
    310
    Points
    7,628
    Level
    26
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 10
    Given: 164

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by BryceC View Post
    He only updates it on Mondays as far as I know. He doesn't do it every day.
    He's been updating it daily for championship week, maybe even more often.



  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 495,914, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    jdoggivjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sterling Heights, MI
    Posts
    33,409
    Points
    495,914
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,345
    Given: 939

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    How does he expect anybody to take him serious when he has Colorado as his "next four out" 8 hours AFTER they win the conference and are a lock? I understand some of these guys dont have the time or resources but this is supposed to be one of the leading sites for the field predictions and he misses this badly?
    Lunardi's Bracketology as of 12:25 am this morning:

    2012 Bracketology - College Basketball Nation Blog - ESPN

    TOP SEED ORDER

    Kentucky
    Syracuse
    North Carolina
    Kansas

    Next in line (in order): Michigan State, Ohio State, Missouri, Duke

    LAST FOUR IN

    South Florida
    North Carolina State
    Seton Hall
    Mississippi State

    FIRST FOUR OUT

    Washington
    Drexel
    Iona
    Miami (Fla.)

    NEXT TWO OUT

    Ole Miss
    Arizona

    CONFERENCE BREAKDOWN

    Big East (10)
    Big Ten (6)
    Big 12 (6)
    ACC (5)
    SEC (5)
    Mountain West (4)
    Atlantic 10 (3)
    West Coast (3)
    Conference USA (2)
    Missouri Valley (2)
    Pac-12 (2)

    AUTOMATIC QUALIFIERS

    Belmont (Atlantic Sun)
    Colorado (Pac-12)
    Creighton (Missouri Valley)
    Davidson (Southern)
    Detroit (Horizon)
    Harvard (Ivy)
    Lamar (Southland)
    Lehigh (Patriot)
    LIU Brooklyn (Northeast)
    Long Beach State (Big West)
    Louisville (Big East)
    Loyola-Md. (MAAC)
    Memphis (Conference USA)
    Mississippi Valley State (SWAC)
    Missouri (Big 12)
    Montana (Big Sky)
    Murray State (OVC)
    New Mexico (Mountain West)
    New Mexico State (WAC)
    Norfolk State (MEAC)
    Ohio (MAC)
    Saint Mary's (West Coast)
    South Dakota State (Summit)
    UNC Asheville (Big South)
    Vermont (America East)
    VCU (Colonial)
    Western Kentucky (Sun Belt)

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueywqUBW3oM]YOU GOT FAIL HORN'D! - YouTube[/ame]


    Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice?
    Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.


  5. #5
    Speechless
    Points: 283,761, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    16,815
    Points
    283,761
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 322
    Given: 51

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    That hasn't been updated this morning.



  6. #6
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 5,776, Level: 22
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 274
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    321
    Points
    5,776
    Level
    22
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 105

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    I am actually sick of Joe Lunardi.



  7. #7
    Starter
    Points: 11,848, Level: 32
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 102
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    leroycyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Boulder, CO
    Posts
    830
    Points
    11,848
    Level
    32
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14
    Given: 0

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    How does he expect anybody to take him serious when he has Colorado as his "next four out" 8 hours AFTER they win the conference and are a lock? I understand some of these guys dont have the time or resources but this is supposed to be one of the leading sites for the field predictions and he misses this badly?
    I have quickly learned that the pundits, Lunardi, Palm, are just tools. It's fun to read the bracketologies occasionally but they're not to be taken too seriously.

    LE said it best in his outburst that was highlighted with a link to the Marshall U site on CF. Computers do the work. He called the reporters "idiots." Reporters probably get their expertise from the pundits. LE knows a lot more than the pundits and the reporters.

    I would really enjoy being in Hilton tonight at 6:00pm but that can't happen, so I'll watch TV.

    I sure don't want the Cyclones drawing Cincinnati in the first game.



  8. #8
    All-Star
    Points: 44,914, Level: 65
    Level completed: 52%, Points required for next Level: 636
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,918
    Points
    44,914
    Level
    65
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 39
    Given: 52

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Probably just an oversight.



  9. #9
    Speechless
    Points: 495,914, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    jdoggivjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sterling Heights, MI
    Posts
    33,409
    Points
    495,914
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,345
    Given: 939

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by megamanxzero35 View Post
    Probably just an oversight.
    Unless he posts a link showing us what he's referring to I'm assuming he's either flat out wrong or full of **** and just stirring the pot because what I linked and posted shows that at 12:25 AM ET he has Colorado as having the Pac 12 auto bid.

    I get that ESPN bashing is the popular thing to do around here, but if you're going to do so have your facts straight or at least link your evidence.


    Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice?
    Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.


  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 37,838, Level: 59
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 12
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Cincyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    2,884
    Points
    37,838
    Level
    59
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 143
    Given: 396

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by megamanxzero35 View Post
    Probably just an oversight.
    Unless he posts a link showing us what he's referring to I'm assuming he's either flat out wrong or full of **** and just stirring the pot because what I linked and posted shows that at 12:25 AM ET he has Colorado as having the Pac 12 auto bid.I get that ESPN bashing is the popular thing to do around here, but if you're going to do so have your facts straight or at least link your evidence.
    +1



  11. #11
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 7,628, Level: 26
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 522
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience Points1 year registered
    JoshTheCyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Fort Dodge
    Posts
    310
    Points
    7,628
    Level
    26
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 10
    Given: 164

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Nihawk View Post
    I am actually sick of Joe Lunardi.
    THIS. ^



  12. #12
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 140,793, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,509
    Points
    140,793
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by BryceC View Post
    He only updates it on Mondays as far as I know. He doesn't do it every day.
    he is on TV right now propping up the big 10 -- idiot



  13. #13
    All-Star
    Points: 27,518, Level: 50
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 32
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Clone96's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    1,236
    Points
    27,518
    Level
    50
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 52
    Given: 4

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    How does he expect anybody to take him serious when he has Colorado as his "next four out" 8 hours AFTER they win the conference and are a lock? I understand some of these guys dont have the time or resources but this is supposed to be one of the leading sites for the field predictions and he misses this badly?
    Um, you did see at the top it said "Updated, March 10", right?



  14. #14
    Pro
    Points: 55,392, Level: 72
    Level completed: 90%, Points required for next Level: 158
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cy4prez7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    2,734
    Points
    55,392
    Level
    72
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 110
    Given: 74

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Dislike him as much as you want but when it comes to his final bracket, he is very rarely wrong.


    KCCO



    Follow me on Twitter: @datBASS3
    Follow Iowa State Drumline on Twitter: @ISUDrumline or on FB

  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 78,784, Level: 87
    Level completed: 25%, Points required for next Level: 1,366
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Chicago, Il
    Posts
    6,331
    Points
    78,784
    Level
    87
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 77
    Given: 17

    Re: Lunardi's Bracketology

    Kansas State is now an 8 seed in his bracket and we're a 9. Not sure I agree with that one...considering we won 2 more conference games than them, 1 more overall win, they lost to Oklahoma twice, lost to us twice, took OT to beat NORTH FLORIDA.

    Must have something to do with the fact that both of their wins against the top 3 ranked in conference (Kansas, Mizzou, Baylor) were away.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.tv
  • HOOPS: Iowa State vs. Mississippi Valley State
  • December 31, 2014
  • 06:00 PM