Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
  1. #1
    Pro
    Points: 22,441, Level: 45
    Level completed: 88%, Points required for next Level: 109
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    EggMcClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,374
    Points
    22,441
    Level
    45
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    The opposing take on ISU

    Seth Davis asked 2 coaches from each league for their take on the best teams in the conference, mostly looking for weaknesses. Interesting read on everybody but here is the ISU blurb:
    Iowa State: The Cyclones are deceptively talented, but they can be lulled to sleep and get disinterested, particularly Royce White. He is an Anthony Mason-type player, a distributor and a facilitator. He's just so talented that he gets bored out there sometimes. Then all of a sudden he's like, now I'm going to play. Then he'll make five plays that nobody in the country at his size can make. I like Chris Allen, but Scott Christopherson is the guy on the perimeter for them. I think a team that can get out and make shots would give them trouble. White is good inside, but that's not what he wants to do. He wants style points. He wants to show he can handle the ball and throw a behind-the-back pass. It also hurts them because he handles the ball so much, yet he misses free throws. Then they bring in Melvin Ejim, who's 6-6, and Anthony Booker, who's 6-9 but wants to shoot threes. So they don't have much inside besides Royce.



  2. #2
    Legend
    Points: 211,133, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    MNCyGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    10,740
    Points
    211,133
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 521
    Given: 363

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Quote Originally Posted by EggMcClone View Post
    Seth Davis asked 2 coaches from each league for their take on the best teams in the conference, mostly looking for weaknesses. Interesting read on everybody but here is the ISU blurb:

    That's a pretty fair assessment, I'd say.



  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 869,961, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 46.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    CycloneErik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Jamerica
    Posts
    56,479
    Points
    869,961
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,162
    Given: 1,800

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Some seems a little overblown, in that Booker and Royce seem pretty willing to go inside.

    I would never argue against the word "disinterested." That seemed to happen to our team overall a few times this year, and you can see it still, just less dramatically.

    Pretty fair assessment, though. I'm almost arguing a technicality.


    Since we are an elite team now, let's go get that One Cyclone Moment.
    Make this one for the ages!




    http://rememberingdoria.wordpress.com/

  4. #4
    Hooper drives the boat, Chief
    Points: 606,000, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 54.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupVeteran50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class
    Mr Janny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    22,606
    Points
    606,000
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,506
    Given: 141

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Quote Originally Posted by MNCyGuy View Post
    That's a pretty fair assessment, I'd say.
    yeah, that's pretty accurate, imho.


    "What a horrible night to have a curse."
    -Simon Belmont

    "Please bury me with all my stuff, because you know it's mine..."
    -Master Shake

    "Passersby were amazed by the unusually large amounts of blood."
    -Lorem Ipsum

  5. #5
    Speechless
    Points: 409,890, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    alarson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    West Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    21,355
    Points
    409,890
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 460
    Given: 199

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Wisconsin gets some great comments in that link.



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 173,898, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    RayShimley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Montreal, QC
    Posts
    6,032
    Points
    173,898
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 73
    Given: 27

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Spot on, I'd say. I don't mind Booker shooting three's if he's wide open though. He's shown he can make them...Ejim on the other hand.....



  7. #7
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 92,596, Level: 94
    Level completed: 71%, Points required for next Level: 554
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Bader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    4,417
    Points
    92,596
    Level
    94
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 37
    Given: 27

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Yea pretty fair, it has been nice to see Melvin slow down on chucking up threes and actually moving inside with and without the ball. It's showing in his production the last few games.



  8. #8
    Pro
    Points: 101,875, Level: 99
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 1,175
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Your first GroupVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    khaal53's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,479
    Points
    101,875
    Level
    99
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 58
    Given: 0

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    I don't necessarily disagree with it, it just isn't what I would prioritize if I were only writing a paragraph about ISU. Of course, I'm biased and have my own perspective.




    I'm on Twitter: @khaal53

  9. #9
    Pro
    Points: 57,284, Level: 74
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 1,266
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    MissouriCyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Raleigh, North Carolina
    Posts
    3,195
    Points
    57,284
    Level
    74
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Why is the Pac-12 featured on here?



  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 42,098, Level: 63
    Level completed: 35%, Points required for next Level: 852
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience PointsYour first Group

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    SW Iowa
    Posts
    2,235
    Points
    42,098
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 66
    Given: 51

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Ejim is a good jump shooter with the mid range stuff out to about 18 feet. I've like the past couple of games how he has driven more. Plus hes a good FT shooter.



  11. #11
    Legend
    Points: 169,224, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    The_Architect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Focus Town
    Posts
    11,644
    Points
    169,224
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 363
    Given: 1,410

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    I think that's a far write-up but I think it unfairly takes a shot at Booker. Dude makes it rain from 3, he can shoot it as many times as he want's if he's got a good look.


    While on live TV, Ford used a vulgar term to describe a private part of the female anatomy, adding that he was “happily married” and “got more than enough to eat at home.”

  12. #12
    Addict
    Points: 82,670, Level: 89
    Level completed: 40%, Points required for next Level: 1,080
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    CYVADER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cornfields
    Posts
    5,231
    Points
    82,670
    Level
    89
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 5

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Quote Originally Posted by khaal53 View Post
    I don't necessarily disagree with it, it just isn't what I would prioritize if I were only writing a paragraph about ISU. Of course, I'm biased and have my own perspective.
    to be fair, i think they were asked to only point out weaknesses....



  13. #13
    Addict
    Points: 173,898, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    RayShimley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Montreal, QC
    Posts
    6,032
    Points
    173,898
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 73
    Given: 27

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Architect View Post
    I think that's a far write-up but I think it unfairly takes a shot at Booker. Dude makes it rain from 3, he can shoot it as many times as he want's if he's got a good look.
    That's key. If he has time to spot up and go through his full motion he is deadly. It doesn't seem to matter how open Ejim is or how much time they give him, he is still only going shoot in the low20's.



  14. #14
    Addict
    Points: 164,683, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsCreated Album picturesVeteran
    CtownCyclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    8,772
    Points
    164,683
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 109
    Given: 87

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    Quote Originally Posted by RayShimley View Post
    That's key. If he has time to spot up and go through his full motion he is deadly. It doesn't seem to matter how open Ejim is or how much time they give him, he is still only going shoot in the low20's.
    I like what Melvin brings, but every time he's open on the outside, I find myself yelling "YOU'RE THIS WIDE OPEN FOR A REASON!" at the TV.



  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 97,725, Level: 97
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 1,325
    Overall activity: 37.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    9,166
    Points
    97,725
    Level
    97
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 212
    Given: 514

    Re: The opposing take on ISU

    I agree with other comments here, it's a fair assessment.

    It does seem a little more like "here are the team's weaknesses" as opposed to a balance of strength-weakness. Maybe the entire article has that tone.

    Still, one line jumped out at me "I think a team that can get out and make shots would give them trouble."

    That seems like a no-brainer that could apply to any team, but I've noticed this season that if an ISU opponent can't nail shots with consistency throughout a game, they're screwed. Iowa State will not lose to those teams. Hit some big shots here & there, it's a different matter.

    Something that's easy to take for granted, but which we shouldn't: Iowa State is included in a story with a headline "The inside scoop on the nation's top teams."

    Read that again, then think back about 23 months. Or even 12 months.

    Or even 3.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 07:00 PM