Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
  1. #1
    Prospect
    Points: 2,878, Level: 15
    Level completed: 43%, Points required for next Level: 172
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    9
    Points
    2,878
    Level
    15
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    The Aggies' total defense is comparable to Texas Tech's in 2010. Both were near 100 out of 120 FBS teams. Texas Tech's offense was very prolific in 2010, but I do think A&M's is better. Nevertheless, I think this game has the feel of that game. I would not predict an ISU victory, but I think it will be a surprisingly competitive game.

    I will be interested to see if Herman pushes the tempo, because A&M's defense runs into problems with up-tempo teams. They try to change personnel more than any other team against an up-tempo offense, and it gets them into trouble. A few times per game, they get penalties for 12 or 13 players on the field, and are close a bunch of other times. But, if the tempo does not work, then A&M's offense is on the field a lot more than they need to be -- A&M's offense will get its points. They are just too good with Cyrus Gray and Christine Michael at RB, and Jeff Fuller and Ryan Swope at WR.

    A&M likes to blitz, though, so if Herman successfully pushes the tempo, they could be forced into a vanilla defense. There are two reasons for the up-tempo offenses you see today. First, the offense tries to get the defense to go vanilla. By speeding up the tempo, you limit the changes an offense can make. If you do it right, the defense has to be in a base defense. Second, to get more plays for your offense. This only works if you can get first downs. Against the 99th ranked total defense, I think ISU has a good chance to get first downs and score a lot of points.

    I am not one who is calling for Herman's head. Herman's playcalling is not the problem. You need to be able to execute. If we execute, we have a good chance -- a lot better than anyone thinks we have.



  2. #2
    Rookie Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    490
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    Quote Originally Posted by nrussell2011 View Post
    The Aggies' total defense is comparable to Texas Tech's in 2010. Both were near 100 out of 120 FBS teams. Texas Tech's offense was very prolific in 2010, but I do think A&M's is better. Nevertheless, I think this game has the feel of that game. I would not predict an ISU victory, but I think it will be a surprisingly competitive game.

    I will be interested to see if Herman pushes the tempo, because A&M's defense runs into problems with up-tempo teams. They try to change personnel more than any other team against an up-tempo offense, and it gets them into trouble. A few times per game, they get penalties for 12 or 13 players on the field, and are close a bunch of other times. But, if the tempo does not work, then A&M's offense is on the field a lot more than they need to be -- A&M's offense will get its points. They are just too good with Cyrus Gray and Christine Michael at RB, and Jeff Fuller and Ryan Swope at WR.

    A&M likes to blitz, though, so if Herman successfully pushes the tempo, they could be forced into a vanilla defense. There are two reasons for the up-tempo offenses you see today. First, the offense tries to get the defense to go vanilla. By speeding up the tempo, you limit the changes an offense can make. If you do it right, the defense has to be in a base defense. Second, to get more plays for your offense. This only works if you can get first downs. Against the 99th ranked total defense, I think ISU has a good chance to get first downs and score a lot of points.

    I am not one who is calling for Herman's head. Herman's playcalling is not the problem. You need to be able to execute. If we execute, we have a good chance -- a lot better than anyone thinks we have.

    Aggies offense is too good. They will score 40+. Iowa State hasn't shown the ability to keep up with that.



  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 119,259, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUAlum2002's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Urbandale
    Posts
    15,643
    Points
    119,259
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 106
    Given: 110

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    We've played mediocre defenses and still haven't shown the ability to consistently move the ball. At best, we'll be having to drive long fields, at worst, we'll be giving them the ball with short fields due to our inability to keep the chains moving.



  4. #4
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 79,328, Level: 87
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 822
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    twojman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Clive
    Posts
    4,482
    Points
    79,328
    Level
    87
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 29
    Given: 50

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    If ISU does not score at least 30 offensive points it will be considered a pathetic performance.

    I noticed in the first quarter yesterday when Mizzou was blitzing Jantz was checking out of plays (which is good!) but ISU seemed to check into the option. I noticed at least 2 or 3 occasions where Reynolds had press coverage and from what I could tell no safety help. I thought a quick slant would be good to Reynolds or take an extra half second and let Reynolds get by his man.



  5. #5
    All-Star
    Points: 24,298, Level: 47
    Level completed: 75%, Points required for next Level: 252
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,502
    Points
    24,298
    Level
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    Quote Originally Posted by nrussell2011 View Post
    The Aggies' total defense is comparable to Texas Tech's in 2010. Both were near 100 out of 120 FBS teams. Texas Tech's offense was very prolific in 2010, but I do think A&M's is better. Nevertheless, I think this game has the feel of that game. I would not predict an ISU victory, but I think it will be a surprisingly competitive game.

    I will be interested to see if Herman pushes the tempo, because A&M's defense runs into problems with up-tempo teams. They try to change personnel more than any other team against an up-tempo offense, and it gets them into trouble. A few times per game, they get penalties for 12 or 13 players on the field, and are close a bunch of other times. But, if the tempo does not work, then A&M's offense is on the field a lot more than they need to be -- A&M's offense will get its points. They are just too good with Cyrus Gray and Christine Michael at RB, and Jeff Fuller and Ryan Swope at WR.

    A&M likes to blitz, though, so if Herman successfully pushes the tempo, they could be forced into a vanilla defense. There are two reasons for the up-tempo offenses you see today. First, the offense tries to get the defense to go vanilla. By speeding up the tempo, you limit the changes an offense can make. If you do it right, the defense has to be in a base defense. Second, to get more plays for your offense. This only works if you can get first downs. Against the 99th ranked total defense, I think ISU has a good chance to get first downs and score a lot of points.

    I am not one who is calling for Herman's head. Herman's playcalling is not the problem. You need to be able to execute. If we execute, we have a good chance -- a lot better than anyone thinks we have.
    They are actually 102nd, but here is the big problem for ISU. ISU is 108th in total D while A&M is 7th in total O and compare that to ISU being 74th in total O going against the 102nd total D.

    http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.js...iv=IA&site=org



  6. #6
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 56,745, Level: 73
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 305
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    benjay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,637
    Points
    56,745
    Level
    73
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 92
    Given: 23

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    Quote Originally Posted by hawkeyescott View Post
    They are actually 102nd, but here is the big problem for ISU. ISU is 108th in total D while A&M is 7th in total O and compare that to ISU being 74th in total O going against the 102nd total D.

    http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.js...iv=IA&site=org
    I'll be there cheering, but I won't be putting any money on us.



  7. #7
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 79,328, Level: 87
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 822
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    twojman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Clive
    Posts
    4,482
    Points
    79,328
    Level
    87
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 29
    Given: 50

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    Iowa State does give 4.5 for being at home.

    Thanks to Ken Miller for the info via Twitter.



  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 560,575, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteranRecommendation Second Class
    ISUAgronomist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Back in Iowa!!!!!!!!
    Posts
    21,447
    Points
    560,575
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 275
    Given: 139

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    Rushing Defense - 110 (218 ypg)
    Passing Defense - 72 (229.17 ypg)
    Total Defense - 108 (447.17 ypg)
    Scoring Defense - 115 (36.33 ppg)

    Rushing Offense - 61 (150.50 ypg)
    Passing Offense - 61 (231.17 ypg)
    Total Offense - 74 (381.67 ypg)
    Scoring Offense - 84 (24.17 ppg)

    Sacks allowed - 91 (2.67 per game)
    Turnover Margin - 117 (-8 overall, -1.33/game)

    Our stats.




  9. #9
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 79,328, Level: 87
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 822
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    twojman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Clive
    Posts
    4,482
    Points
    79,328
    Level
    87
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 29
    Given: 50

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    Quote Originally Posted by isuaggie View Post
    Rushing Defense - 110 (218 ypg)
    Passing Defense - 72 (229.17 ypg)
    Total Defense - 108 (447.17 ypg)
    Scoring Defense - 115 (36.33 ppg)

    Rushing Offense - 61 (150.50 ypg)
    Passing Offense - 61 (231.17 ypg)
    Total Offense - 74 (381.67 ypg)
    Scoring Offense - 84 (24.17 ppg)

    Sacks allowed - 91 (2.67 per game)
    Turnover Margin - 117 (-8 overall, -1.33/game)

    Our stats.
    Recipe for a 4-8 season?



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 361,629, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    19,217
    Points
    361,629
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 538
    Given: 72

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    Quote Originally Posted by twojman View Post
    If ISU does not score at least 30 offensive points it will be considered a pathetic performance.

    I noticed in the first quarter yesterday when Mizzou was blitzing Jantz was checking out of plays (which is good!) but ISU seemed to check into the option. I noticed at least 2 or 3 occasions where Reynolds had press coverage and from what I could tell no safety help. I thought a quick slant would be good to Reynolds or take an extra half second and let Reynolds get by his man.
    You're going to check into a slant on press coverage on a blitz?


    I'm on Twitter too: Tre4ISU

    Or so I have read.

  11. #11
    Addict
    Points: 101,467, Level: 99
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 1,583
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    awd4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,117
    Points
    101,467
    Level
    99
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 755
    Given: 515

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    That ranking will go up after Saturday.



  12. #12
    Addict
    Points: 211,451, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CyDude16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heads in the sky
    Posts
    9,667
    Points
    211,451
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 284
    Given: 1,071

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    They were bad in '09 and we still were the only team to not put up 30+ against them up until that point.



  13. #13
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 79,328, Level: 87
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 822
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    twojman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Clive
    Posts
    4,482
    Points
    79,328
    Level
    87
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 29
    Given: 50

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    Quote Originally Posted by yaman3 View Post
    You're going to check into a slant on press coverage on a blitz?
    Happens all the time...
    Remember Stanzi beating Michigan St? Remember Cassel to Bowe last week at Indy?



  14. #14
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 9,822, Level: 29
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 128
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    250
    Points
    9,822
    Level
    29
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    That will make it even more painful when they hold us to 17.



  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 94,927, Level: 95
    Level completed: 94%, Points required for next Level: 123
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    xboxfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,143
    Points
    94,927
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 174
    Given: 295

    Re: Texas A&M is 99th in total defense

    Final score, 55-24. A&M's defense will go up in the rankings.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 07:00 PM