Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Starter
    Points: 21,988, Level: 45
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 562
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    992
    Points
    21,988
    Level
    45
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    If that isn't a fumble...

    then shouldn't it have been intentional grounding?

    This might be sour grapes, but I think it is now a fact - Big XII officials suck.


    Believing in Kermuflin since 2009!

  2. #2
    Addict
    Points: 66,183, Level: 79
    Level completed: 84%, Points required for next Level: 267
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Rogue52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    5,751
    Points
    66,183
    Level
    79
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 19
    Given: 1

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    NCAA officiating in general has been pretty horrible, but the rest of the nation has just caught up with the Big XII now.



  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 176,954, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hurdleisu24's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    16,137
    Points
    176,954
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 5

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    not intentional grounding reciever was in area



  4. #4
    Burgermeister!
    Points: 356,849, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    TykeClone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    22,708
    Points
    356,849
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 179
    Given: 358

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    Quote Originally Posted by hurdleisu24 View Post
    not intentional grounding reciever was in area
    Was griffin standing on a receiver?


    Asteroids are nature's way of asking "How's that space program going?"

  5. #5
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 62,804, Level: 77
    Level completed: 73%, Points required for next Level: 446
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Chizit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Section L, Row 11
    Posts
    4,072
    Points
    62,804
    Level
    77
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4
    Given: 0

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    Can you review for Intentional grounding? Because they called it a fumble on the field originally. Either way, on the replay I saw their RB in the area.



  6. #6
    Starter
    Points: 21,988, Level: 45
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 562
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    992
    Points
    21,988
    Level
    45
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    So, it there a tuck rule in college. The announcers certainly didn't know.

    I did find this thread on BYI board from 18Sep that says that there isn't.

    Is there a "tuck rule" in college football? - CougarBoard.com


    Believing in Kermuflin since 2009!

  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 91,922, Level: 94
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 1,228
    Overall activity: 60.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    awd4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Peru, IL
    Posts
    7,532
    Points
    91,922
    Level
    94
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 218
    Given: 205

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    Those were Texas refs just like last game. I knew right away we would get screwed over and that it was going to get overturned.



  8. #8
    Starter
    Points: 11,240, Level: 31
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 10
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    633
    Points
    11,240
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 4

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    not sure why it wasn't called grounding. Intentional grounding is when a quarterback throws an incomplete pass toward an area of the field where there is clearly no eligible receiver. The quarterback must be between the tackle box and behind the line of scrimmage.... unless there was a receiver in the two feet that RGIII threw the ball, the penalty should have been called. Because it was a penalty and they did not call it plus the ruling on the field was a fumble, they could not call the penalty after the play occurred.

    In my mind they should have either.

    #1 originally called intentional grounding if it was an incomplete pass
    #2 since they obviously though it was a fumble (they called it a fumble on the field) it shouldn't have been overturned.


    Last edited by Tredici; 10-08-2011 at 07:57 PM.

  9. #9
    All-Star
    Points: 29,369, Level: 52
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 381
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    cychhosis's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    S.E. Iowa
    Posts
    1,197
    Points
    29,369
    Level
    52
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 44

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    I have never been more ****** at a replay official. That just tells me the Big XII will always protect Texas teams. There is no way there is nothing in the replay to change the call on the field.


    All truisms are false. All of them.

  10. #10
    Starter
    Points: 21,988, Level: 45
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 562
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    992
    Points
    21,988
    Level
    45
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    Quote Originally Posted by hurdleisu24 View Post
    not intentional grounding reciever was in area
    I re-wound and saw that.


    Believing in Kermuflin since 2009!

  11. #11
    Starter
    Points: 11,240, Level: 31
    Level completed: 99%, Points required for next Level: 10
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    633
    Points
    11,240
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 4

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    Quote Originally Posted by agcy68 View Post
    I re-wound and saw that.
    the receiver would have had to been under RGIII



  12. #12
    Addict
    Points: 126,756, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    tim_redd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    7,362
    Points
    126,756
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 96
    Given: 41

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    I think it's a catch 22 for the officials though. They ruled fumble on the field, so they didn't throw the flag. But upon review they said incomplete pass, but they can't throw they flag on review. At least I don't think they can.



  13. #13
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 62,804, Level: 77
    Level completed: 73%, Points required for next Level: 446
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Chizit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Section L, Row 11
    Posts
    4,072
    Points
    62,804
    Level
    77
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 4
    Given: 0

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    Some people are becoming ignorant now.



  14. #14
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 42,287, Level: 63
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 663
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,666
    Points
    42,287
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12
    Given: 11

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    Quote Originally Posted by Tredici View Post
    not sure why it wasn't called grounding. Intentional grounding is when a quarterback throws an incomplete pass toward an area of the field where there is clearly no eligible receiver. The quarterback must be between the tackle box and behind the line of scrimmage.... unless there was a receiver in the two feet that RGIII threw the ball, the penalty should have been called. Because it was a penalty and they did not call it plus the ruling on the field was a fumble, they could not call the penalty after the play occurred.

    In my mind they should have either.

    #1 originally called intentional grounding if it was an incomplete pass
    #2 since they obviously though it was a fumble (they called it a fumble on the field) it shouldn't have been overturned.
    First, it was called a fumble and should have stayed a fumble since the ball came loose after he finished moving his arm forward. So we have another bad job out of the replay official.

    Given that, it should not have been penalized as intentional grounding as the intentional part is a required component of that infraction plus you can not use replay to flag an infraction even if it is obvious on the video review.



  15. #15
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 11,399, Level: 32
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 551
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    Cat4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Spencer, IA
    Posts
    321
    Points
    11,399
    Level
    32
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: If that isn't a fumble...

    terrible call. That's all I can say without screaming.



    LET'S GO STATE! ................................GO CUBS GO!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 11:00 AM