#85 Iowa State
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: #85 Iowa State

  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 48,645, Level: 68
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 1,105
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    FootballinTexas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,275
    Points
    48,645
    Level
    68
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 0

    #85 Iowa State


  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 101,661, Level: 99
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 1,389
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranCreated Album pictures
    Senolcyc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,205
    Points
    101,661
    Level
    99
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 99
    Given: 25

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    Quote Originally Posted by FootballinTexas View Post
    Considering our circumstances.....At least we're not last.

    College Football Countdown: No. 85 Iowa State College Gridiron 365 Blog Orlando Sentinel


    As there are 65 some BCS conference teams, #85 is an insult. No way is Iowa State any worse than somewhere in the 50s.



  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 113,103, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    awd4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,920
    Points
    113,103
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,011
    Given: 646

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    Really? 85th? I guess they figure were going to finish 2-10 or 3-9 this year.



  4. #4
    Addict
    Points: 183,051, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    clonedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,608
    Points
    183,051
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 485
    Given: 0

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    Quote Originally Posted by FootballinTexas View Post
    Considering our circumstances.....At least we're not last.

    College Football Countdown: No. 85 Iowa State College Gridiron 365 Blog Orlando Sentinel

    Without a QB, and with our schedule... I'm not surprised at all. We don't get any respect, and probably won't until we have more success. Just the way it is.

    I'm sure Rhoads will use it as motivation.



  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 60,252, Level: 76
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 1,398
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    CyCloned's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Robins, Iowa
    Posts
    5,091
    Points
    60,252
    Level
    76
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 307
    Given: 139

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    the problem with this is that with the schedule ISU has most teams in the bottom 50 teams would have a lot of trouble winning 5 games. Does the fact that the Cyclones have a super hard schedule make them a worse team than a team with a weak schedule?



  6. #6
    Speechless
    Points: 185,204, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ajk4st8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    15,556
    Points
    185,204
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 248
    Given: 613

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    I guess going about .500 over the past two years hasnt changed much public opinion



  7. #7
    Pro
    Points: 48,779, Level: 68
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 971
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    bostrem00's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Johnston
    Posts
    2,810
    Points
    48,779
    Level
    68
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 32
    Given: 27

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    I don't have a problem with it, it only means we have 84 teams to prove wrong....



  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 348,329, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    19,605
    Points
    348,329
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 741
    Given: 92

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    Quote Originally Posted by ajk4st8 View Post
    I guess going about .500 over the past two years hasnt changed much public opinion
    How many BCS teams were under .500 in the previous two years? My guess is not very many.


    It's all snark from here on out

  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 113,103, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    awd4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    9,920
    Points
    113,103
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,011
    Given: 646

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    Quote Originally Posted by yaman3 View Post
    How many BCS teams were under .500 in the previous two years? My guess is not very many.
    Colorado, Kansas, Virginia, Duke, Wake Forest, Indiana, Purdue, Vanderbilt, Washington State. I would say that is quite a few and there also should be mostly non BCS teams that are going to fill in for the 85-120 slots, but this ranking has way too many BCS schools below 85th.


    Last edited by awd4cy; 05-22-2011 at 09:51 PM.

  10. #10
    Addict
    Points: 46,546, Level: 66
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 404
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    heitclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Malvern, IA
    Posts
    5,045
    Points
    46,546
    Level
    66
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 266
    Given: 403

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    Quote Originally Posted by clonedude View Post
    Without a QB, and with our schedule... I'm not surprised at all. We don't get any respect, and probably won't until we have more success. Just the way it is.

    I'm sure Rhoads will use it as motivation.
    Yea..on paper our offense (which wasn't anything special last year) looks pretty bleak. We didn't just lose AA, we lost nearly all our offensive production. I don't agree with being 85th, but I get why someone would think we could be one of the poorer BCS teams. The hard part to believe is that 20 or so non BCS teams are expected to be better.



  11. #11
    Addict
    Points: 79,159, Level: 87
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 991
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    dualthreat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Alumni road
    Posts
    6,998
    Points
    79,159
    Level
    87
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 261
    Given: 42

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    im sure they would put northern illinois above us. they did last year even though we kicked their ***.

    its like, because they beat ball state, toledo, akron, buffalo and whoever else they play, people seem to think they're good. Middle Tennessee state was ranked #25 to start last season! I bet we would have beaten them easily.



  12. #12
    All-Star
    Points: 12,624, Level: 33
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 26
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran
    InCytful's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    1,223
    Points
    12,624
    Level
    33
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 11

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    These preseason ranking things are pretty meaningless. I'm sure we're picked 8th or 9th in the 10-team Big XII. With an offense that was weak last year, and loses some talented guys, I can't blame them much. However, I look at the losses on the personnel side as a positive. Year 3 of the new offense should start seeing the guys hit the field on offense that the coaches think can run their system, not guys that have gone through three different system and did their best in each. I have to believe they will be better, and definitely better than number 85 in any publication's rankings. Go State!



  13. #13
    All-Star
    Points: 48,645, Level: 68
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 1,105
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    FootballinTexas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,275
    Points
    48,645
    Level
    68
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 8
    Given: 0

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    Quote Originally Posted by awd4cy View Post
    Really? 85th? I guess they figure were going to finish 2-10 or 3-9 this year.
    Surprising! Someone needs to get the word out that we have "The Man Of Steele".



  14. #14
    Pro
    Points: 43,938, Level: 64
    Level completed: 76%, Points required for next Level: 312
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,040
    Points
    43,938
    Level
    64
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 87
    Given: 0

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    I don't see this as a surprise. We were 5-7 last year and like someone said we lost the majority of our offensive production. It is hard to predict what QB and WR positions will do this year. And we have one of the toughest schedules in the country. I don't think the ranking is about not getting respect I think if you look at it objectively that is where we should be ranked preseason. That doesn't mean we could be better than that but there are too many question marks at important positions right now.



  15. #15
    Pro
    Points: 29,702, Level: 52
    Level completed: 96%, Points required for next Level: 48
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    cygrads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Altoona, IA
    Posts
    2,088
    Points
    29,702
    Level
    52
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 35
    Given: 228

    Re: #85 Iowa State

    There are 11 BCS schools 85 and below (ISU inclusive) and since there are 66 BCS schools that means there are 55 left to be ranked between 1-84. That means there are 29 non BCA schools ranked 1-84. That 29 seems high to me - I know there are plenty of non BCS schools better than ISU but 29 really? I suppose if you are looking at record only then maybe. I would take ISU against most of those 29 (obviously there are very good schools BSU, TCU, BYU in that 29). I'd say if it were based on who would win on the field ISU should be around 25 places higher - say around 60th.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.tv
  • HOOPS: Iowa State vs. Mississippi Valley State
  • December 31, 2014
  • 06:00 PM