Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 47
  1. #1
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 40,794, Level: 62
    Level completed: 35%, Points required for next Level: 856
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    WDM
    Posts
    4,303
    Points
    40,794
    Level
    62
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 74
    Given: 54

  2. #2
    Speechless
    Points: 519,924, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 61.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    jdoggivjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sterling Heights, MI
    Posts
    36,115
    Points
    519,924
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,376
    Given: 1,752

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    One 15 second glance at that article and I came to the realization that their definition of a "bad" team is one that isn't located in Austin, Norman, Gainesville, Tuscaloosa, Auburn, Baton Rouge, Columbus, Los Angeles, etc. Iowa State is by no means a powerhouse, but are we necessarily a bad team? Remains to be seen...


    Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice?
    Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.


  3. #3
    Speechless
    Points: 353,890, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    20,594
    Points
    353,890
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,289
    Given: 171

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    One 15 second glance at that article and I came to the realization that their definition of a "bad" team is one that isn't located in Austin, Norman, Gainesville, Tuscaloosa, Auburn, Baton Rouge, Columbus, Los Angeles, etc. Iowa State is by no means a powerhouse, but are we necessarily a bad team? Remains to be seen...
    We're a bad team. We may be on the way up, but if you don't make a bowl, you will be considered a bad team.


    It's all snark from here on out

  4. #4
    Addict
    Points: 118,888, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    RING4CY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Nevada, IA
    Posts
    7,640
    Points
    118,888
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 563
    Given: 336

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    How many of those other "bad" teams have beaten Nebraska and Texas in their respective backyards AND won a bowl game in the last two years?


    We still have a lot of room for improvement, but I just don't buy that we're a "bad" team anymore.


    Quote Originally Posted by cyrocksmypants View Post
    I didn't know Satan posted on here. Because clearly with this opinion, you're the devil.

  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 118,888, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    RING4CY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Nevada, IA
    Posts
    7,640
    Points
    118,888
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 563
    Given: 336

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    I came to the realization that their definition of a "bad" team is one that isn't located in Austin...
    Quote Originally Posted by yaman3 View Post
    ...but if you don't make a bowl, you will be considered a bad team.
    Then the team in Austin needs to be a part of that list.


    Quote Originally Posted by cyrocksmypants View Post
    I didn't know Satan posted on here. Because clearly with this opinion, you're the devil.

  6. #6
    Speechless
    Points: 519,924, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 61.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    jdoggivjc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sterling Heights, MI
    Posts
    36,115
    Points
    519,924
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,376
    Given: 1,752

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Quote Originally Posted by yaman3 View Post
    We're a bad team. We may be on the way up, but if you don't make a bowl, you will be considered a bad team.
    Except Baylor, Connecticut, Cincinnati, and K-State (offhand) all made bowls last year - and they're considered "bad teams."

    So what exactly is this guy's definition of a bad team? I stand by my argument...


    Chuck Lidell: I paint my toenails with pink and black polish. Problem is, I get more paint on my toes and on the carpet than on my nails. Any advice?
    Maria Sharapova: Don't you beat up other guys for a living? I don't know how to answer this.


  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 353,890, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    20,594
    Points
    353,890
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,289
    Given: 171

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Quote Originally Posted by RING4CY View Post
    Then the team in Austin needs to be a part of that list.
    Maybe they don't have any good players?

    Quote Originally Posted by jdoggivjc View Post
    Except Baylor, Connecticut, Cincinnati, and K-State (offhand) all made bowls last year - and they're considered "bad teams."

    So what exactly is this guy's definition of a bad team? I stand by my argument...
    And all are considered to be bad teams by National media. I didn't say that's the only way to define a bad team but when you have 17 wins in the last 4 years and a trajectory leaning towards flat over the last 10, you aren't going to be more than a bad team in the National media. I disagree with it and I think next year we will be and average to good team, but I certainly don't expect someone to look at our performance over the previous two seasons and say we are more than bad.


    It's all snark from here on out

  8. #8
    Addict
    Points: 106,031, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    ribsnwhiskey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    5,383
    Points
    106,031
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,318
    Given: 336

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Another worthless rivals article. We weren't a bad team last year. We played the toughest schedule in the nation, went 5-7 and were a 2 point conversion away from another bowl game. Cheezdiks 2 years at ISU were bad teams. Do they realize he's not cheating...er...coaching here anymore?



  9. #9
    Speechless
    Points: 353,890, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    20,594
    Points
    353,890
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,289
    Given: 171

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Quote Originally Posted by ribsnwhiskey View Post
    Another worthless rivals article. We weren't a bad team last year. We played the toughest schedule in the nation, went 5-7 and were a 2 point conversion away from another bowl game. Cheezdiks 2 years at ISU were bad teams. Do they realize he's not cheating...er...coaching here anymore?
    We didn't play the hardest schedule in the Nation. It was at one point but when Texas plummeted and no one else except Oklahoma, Utah, and Iowa were much above average, our SOS went down. Still a difficult schedule, but still a schedule we should have made a bowl game with.


    It's all snark from here on out

  10. #10
    Addict
    Points: 118,888, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    RING4CY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Nevada, IA
    Posts
    7,640
    Points
    118,888
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 563
    Given: 336

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Quote Originally Posted by yaman3 View Post
    Maybe they don't have any good players?
    So let me get this straight, bad players = good teams and good players = bad teams? Gotcha.


    Quote Originally Posted by cyrocksmypants View Post
    I didn't know Satan posted on here. Because clearly with this opinion, you're the devil.

  11. #11
    Starter
    Points: 25,648, Level: 49
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 902
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    894
    Points
    25,648
    Level
    49
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 21
    Given: 13

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Iowa State will be considered a "bad team" until we win a conference championship, or we are in the discussion for one at the end of the year for 2 or 3 years in a row.

    National Media (heck even most Big12 media) outlets use us as the "Example" of a bad team regularly. It doesn't matter if we're average or even an above average. We are, and we will be, the easy target because we've been bad for so long.



  12. #12
    Addict
    Points: 106,031, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    ribsnwhiskey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    5,383
    Points
    106,031
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,318
    Given: 336

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Quote Originally Posted by yaman3 View Post
    We didn't play the hardest schedule in the Nation. It was at one point but when Texas plummeted and no one else except Oklahoma, Utah, and Iowa were much above average, our SOS went down. Still a difficult schedule, but still a schedule we should have made a bowl game with.
    Agree to disagree. Not a lot of teams could've played our schedule last year and win 6 games.



  13. #13
    Speechless
    Points: 354,990, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    cyhiphopp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Johnston
    Posts
    20,581
    Points
    354,990
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3,776
    Given: 7,222

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Quote Originally Posted by synapticwave View Post
    Iowa State will be considered a "bad team" until we win a conference championship, or we are in the discussion for one at the end of the year for 2 or 3 years in a row.

    National Media (heck even most Big12 media) outlets use us as the "Example" of a bad team regularly. It doesn't matter if we're average or even an above average. We are, and we will be, the easy target because we've been bad for so long.
    Part of the issue is that we aren't a great team, but we are in a much publicized conference. When OU beats us 54-0 it gets a lot more press than when New Mexico State gets pummeled. Then, when we beat NU in Lincoln or UT in Austin they immediately see it as a sign of those teams being horrible and ask how ISU beat them.

    We have to win more games, especially the ones we are supposed to, so that upsets don't seem that out of the ordinary.


    2014-15 Cyclone Fanatic NBA Fantasy Basketball Champion!



  14. #14
    Addict
    Points: 88,335, Level: 92
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 1,015
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsSocial
    dualthreat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    7,552
    Points
    88,335
    Level
    92
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 487
    Given: 59

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Clemson always comes to my mind when I hear "good players, bad team"


    "Success isn't owned. It's leased, and rent is due everyday" -J.J. Watt

  15. #15
    Pro
    Points: 60,436, Level: 76
    Level completed: 25%, Points required for next Level: 1,214
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Created Album pictures50000 Experience PointsVeteranSocial
    geburgess's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    WDSM, IA
    Posts
    2,382
    Points
    60,436
    Level
    76
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: Good Players, Bad Teams...

    Eh, I don't particularly disagree with much in the article. When you go bowling consistently, you are a good team. When you don't, you're a bad team. We haven't been consistent, thus the bad team mantra.


    Keepers of the Faith -- The Unknown



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.TV
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • September 5, 2015
  • 07:00 PM