Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Addict
    Points: 166,400, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    jaretac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Frigidaire
    Posts
    7,635
    Points
    166,400
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    In the mens Elite 8 was:
    #1
    #2
    #2
    #3
    #4
    #5
    #8
    #11

    Of that #3, 4, 8, 11 made it to the final four.

    In the womens Elite 8 are:
    #1
    #1
    #1
    #1
    #2
    #2
    #2
    #11

    I wish more could be done to elevate the mid-majors like ISU to compete with the top tier teams. Oh, of those #1's, Tennessee, Uconn and Stanford are included. Those teams have won 18 of the 29 National titles.



  2. #2
    Legend
    Points: 180,040, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 20.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Aclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Des Moines, Ia.
    Posts
    12,858
    Points
    180,040
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 165
    Given: 669

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Point. The elite teams in WBB just rake off the top talent, and everyone else brings up the rear.




    Paul Rhoads' players never quit.
    (They just disappear offseason)


  3. #3
    Bench Warmer
    Points: 11,748, Level: 32
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 202
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Sloan, Iowa
    Posts
    307
    Points
    11,748
    Level
    32
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 10

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Quote Originally Posted by jaretac View Post
    In the mens Elite 8 was:
    #1
    #2
    #2
    #3
    #4
    #5
    #8
    #11

    Of that #3, 4, 8, 11 made it to the final four.

    In the womens Elite 8 are:
    #1
    #1
    #1
    #1
    #2
    #2
    #2
    #11

    I wish more could be done to elevate the mid-majors like ISU to compete with the top tier teams. Oh, of those #1's, Tennessee, Uconn and Stanford are included. Those teams have won 18 of the 29 National titles.
    And no offense intended here, but this is surprising? Such is the way of the women's sport for now. Yes, Georgetown did scare UConn.. and the same sortof goes with Green Bay vs. Baylor. But there is a sizeable disparity between the top 10 or so programs and the rest of the field.



  4. #4
    Addict
    Points: 109,655, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    5,350
    Points
    109,655
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 303
    Given: 286

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Quote Originally Posted by jaretac View Post
    In the mens Elite 8 was:
    #1
    #2
    #2
    #3
    #4
    #5
    #8
    #11

    Of that #3, 4, 8, 11 made it to the final four.

    In the womens Elite 8 are:
    #1
    #1
    #1
    #1
    #2
    #2
    #2
    #11

    I wish more could be done to elevate the mid-majors like ISU to compete with the top tier teams. Oh, of those #1's, Tennessee, Uconn and Stanford are included. Those teams have won 18 of the 29 National titles.
    There just doesn't seem to be as much talent to choose from in women's basketball. And the best coaches are at the best schools (in most cases). There's not a lot that can be done about that, unfortunately. The top players just don't go play for Iowa, ISU, etc. when Geno or Pat Summitt come calling.

    But I think it may level off eventually. Right now, I mean Pat Summitt has been at Tennessee forever it seems. Geno has been at UCONN since '85. Stringer is at a school that's tougher to win at, IMO. But when she was at Iowa, she was able to bring in elite talent every year, too. And she's been in the game for a long time as well.

    Once the elite coaches who were there at the beginning of major women's college athletics start fading out, the playing field may level off. The sport just isn't old enough yet, IMO.


    “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

    “With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan. ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011

    “He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

  5. #5
    Pro
    Points: 34,854, Level: 57
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 596
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    istater7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,825
    Points
    34,854
    Level
    57
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 51
    Given: 28

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    isu isn't a mid-major..



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 109,655, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    5,350
    Points
    109,655
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 303
    Given: 286

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Quote Originally Posted by istater7 View Post
    isu isn't a mid-major..
    Not in title, but for all intents and purposes they are, just like Iowa and 90% of the rest of the teams out there. The talent gap is just enormous right now.


    “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

    “With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan. ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011

    “He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 399,022, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    58,863
    Points
    399,022
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 555
    Given: 357

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Looks like they could just run an Elite 8 tournament for the gals.


    Let my Fred's Posse Ride: Georges, Naz, Hogue, Bryce, Nader, Monte, Matt, and McKay.

  8. #8
    Addict
    Points: 82,551, Level: 89
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 1,199
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    tigershoops31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    5,399
    Points
    82,551
    Level
    89
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 14
    Given: 56

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    I believe there are differences in the # of scholarships basketball can give out between mens and womens if I remember right because of Title 9.

    If you think about it that's a pretty big deal. If even just a few more elite talents are at the elite schools, that's a much bigger drop off by the time the second tier schools gets their next pick of talent.

    The other reason is that you don't see WBB players leave early to go to the WNBA like the men's side. This allows for more upsets because there are younger more talented players for elite teams going up against experienced players with slightly less talent for second tier teams. In many cases in a tournament situation experience wins. In WBB you have experienced AND more talented players at the elite programs so that's a tough combo to beat.



    “I’m just glad I have Homan as my bodyguard,” Eustachy joked. “If I ever make it real big and get to drive a limo everyday, he’ll be driving it. I thought he came off the bench like somebody was stealing his cow or something.”

    http://blogs.dmjuice.com/?cat=43

  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 109,655, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    5,350
    Points
    109,655
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 303
    Given: 286

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Quote Originally Posted by tigershoops31 View Post
    I believe there are differences in the # of scholarships basketball can give out between mens and womens if I remember right because of Title 9.

    If you think about it that's a pretty big deal. If even just a few more elite talents are at the elite schools, that's a much bigger drop off by the time the second tier schools gets their next pick of talent.

    The other reason is that you don't see WBB players leave early to go to the WNBA like the men's side. This allows for more upsets because there are younger more talented players for elite teams going up against experienced players with slightly less talent for second tier teams. In many cases in a tournament situation experience wins. In WBB you have experienced AND more talented players at the elite programs so that's a tough combo to beat.
    This. That's precisely why Kentucky did not reach the Final Four last year. They were by far the most talented team in the country, but like 4/5 of their starting lineup were freshman. That just isn't going to fly come March.


    “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

    “With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan. ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011

    “He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

  10. #10
    Legend
    Points: 287,984, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 12.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    CloneAggie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    14,854
    Points
    287,984
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Quote Originally Posted by tm3308 View Post
    There just doesn't seem to be as much talent to choose from in women's basketball. And the best coaches are at the best schools (in most cases). There's not a lot that can be done about that, unfortunately. The top players just don't go play for Iowa, ISU, etc. when Geno or Pat Summitt come calling.

    But I think it may level off eventually. Right now, I mean Pat Summitt has been at Tennessee forever it seems. Geno has been at UCONN since '85. Stringer is at a school that's tougher to win at, IMO. But when she was at Iowa, she was able to bring in elite talent every year, too. And she's been in the game for a long time as well.

    Once the elite coaches who were there at the beginning of major women's college athletics start fading out, the playing field may level off. The sport just isn't old enough yet, IMO.
    I don't think the difference in amount of elite talent is the explanation. I believe a better explanation is that in men's the elite talent leaves quickly to go to the NBA. Thus, seniors that aren't elite talent can match up better with freshmen that are elite talent because of the senior's experience. In women's, the elite talents stays four years, and therefore the non-elite talent seniors are matching up against elite talent seniors, and the experience factor is negated.


    Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that. ~ George Carlin

    There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life:
    The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves Orcs. ~ John Rogers

  11. #11
    Addict
    Points: 109,655, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    5,350
    Points
    109,655
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 303
    Given: 286

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Quote Originally Posted by CloneAggie View Post
    I don't think the difference in amount of elite talent is the explanation. I believe a better explanation is that in men's the elite talent leaves quickly to go to the NBA. Thus, seniors that aren't elite talent can match up better with freshmen that are elite talent because of the senior's experience. In women's, the elite talents stays four years, and therefore the non-elite talent seniors are matching up against elite talent seniors, and the experience factor is negated.
    That's true as well. But I do think things will level off some once Summitt, Geno, etc. are out of the game. I mean coaches like that are practically the founding "fathers" of women's college basketball.


    “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

    “With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan. ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011

    “He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

  12. #12
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 58,596, Level: 75
    Level completed: 4%, Points required for next Level: 1,454
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,367
    Points
    58,596
    Level
    75
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 36
    Given: 0

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Quote Originally Posted by Aclone View Post
    Point. The elite teams in WBB just rake off the top talent, and everyone else brings up the rear.
    It not just that. In Men's basketball, the elite teams rake off the top talent as well. However, often that talent only lasts a year or 2, so teams that have lesser talent but stick around for 4 years can compete.



  13. #13
    Pro
    Points: 36,605, Level: 58
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 45
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    drmwevr08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    3,446
    Points
    36,605
    Level
    58
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 5

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    The leader in ESPNs challenge for the ladies has missed a grand total of 2 games. They had 15 of the sweet 16 and are perfect since.


    Nothing to see here mods. Keep moving.

  14. #14
    Addict
    Points: 109,655, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    tm3308's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Corydon/Iowa City, IA
    Posts
    5,350
    Points
    109,655
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 303
    Given: 286

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Quote Originally Posted by drmwevr08 View Post
    The leader in ESPNs challenge for the ladies has missed a grand total of 2 games. They had 15 of the sweet 16 and are perfect since.
    I've missed a total of 8 games so far, but most of them didn't hurt me a lot. I've gotta hope for A&M to upset Baylor to have any chance of winning, though.


    “Hawks tell us we have no future, and we let you know what we think of Hawk fans, which is a lower opinion all the time.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

    “With the exception of tm3308. He is a good contributor on this site. It is almost to the point that I question if he is actually a hawk fan. ” -- Cyclonestate78 7/25/2011

    “He broke the mold. If he wrote the OP, I would have read the whole thing.” – CycloneErik 7/25/2011

  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 96,616, Level: 96
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 434
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    awd4cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Peru, IL
    Posts
    8,599
    Points
    96,616
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 626
    Given: 446

    Re: Difference between men & women basketball never so glaring

    Quote Originally Posted by jaretac View Post
    In the mens Elite 8 was:
    #1
    #2
    #2
    #3
    #4
    #5
    #8
    #11

    Of that #3, 4, 8, 11 made it to the final four.

    In the womens Elite 8 are:
    #1
    #1
    #1
    #1
    #2
    #2
    #2
    #11
    .
    This is part of the reason why womens basketball is so boring. There never seem like there are hardly even small upsets or surprises



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: FS1
  • Iowa State @ Oklahoma State
  • October 4, 2014
  • 11:00 AM