Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Starter
    Points: 20,699, Level: 43
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 51
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points
    CloneJob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    782
    Points
    20,699
    Level
    43
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 93
    Given: 48

    DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    DG had a fab year. Huge improvement over his 8 point average his Junior year. How much of that improvement is coaching vs. not having Brackins on the team? I think 90%+ is coaching.

    If you're looking for concrete evidence Fred is going to be a great coach... I think it's DG!!



  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 58,649, Level: 75
    Level completed: 7%, Points required for next Level: 1,401
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    CloneState1028's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ames, IA via Cedar Rapids
    Posts
    3,273
    Points
    58,649
    Level
    75
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    I'd say it's 20% coaching/confidence in the kid, and 80% strictly changing roles. His role went from 'Give it to Craig' to 'Score and create'.



  3. #3
    Pro
    Points: 101,877, Level: 99
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 1,173
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranCreated Album pictures
    Senolcyc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,206
    Points
    101,877
    Level
    99
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 99
    Given: 25

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    Quote Originally Posted by CloneJob View Post
    If you're looking for concrete evidence Fred is going to be a great coach... I think it's DG!!

    There's no concrete evidence that Fred is going to be a great coach. Still just hopes and we all have them.



  4. #4
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 85,892, Level: 91
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 1,558
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,799
    Points
    85,892
    Level
    91
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 6

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    Quote Originally Posted by CloneState1028 View Post
    I'd say it's 20% coaching/confidence in the kid, and 80% strictly changing roles. His role went from 'Give it to Craig' to 'Score and create'.
    I say closer to 5% and 95%. People contiually claim DG shot better this year but his FG% doesn't reflect that. Now he shot more and was asked to do more so it is understandable that his % may drop. However, he was never asked to score last year and most of his shots were taken in a rush as the shot clock wound down so he was forcing a higher % last year.

    In the end, I have always felt DG had the game he displayed this year. He has always had the 12-15 ft jumper, has been a marginal 3pt shooter and could get to the rim. He is a good shooter when square to the basket. Not so much when he isn't. Biggest difference was Fred asked him to score and GMac told him to feed the ball to Brackins and Gilstrap


    "Not at the table Carlos."

  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 70,794, Level: 82
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 656
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,903
    Points
    70,794
    Level
    82
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 488
    Given: 105

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    Quote Originally Posted by tazclone View Post
    I say closer to 5% and 95%. People contiually claim DG shot better this year but his FG% doesn't reflect that. Now he shot more and was asked to do more so it is understandable that his % may drop. However, he was never asked to score last year and most of his shots were taken in a rush as the shot clock wound down so he was forcing a higher % last year.

    In the end, I have always felt DG had the game he displayed this year. He has always had the 12-15 ft jumper, has been a marginal 3pt shooter and could get to the rim. He is a good shooter when square to the basket. Not so much when he isn't. Biggest difference was Fred asked him to score and GMac told him to feed the ball to Brackins and Gilstrap
    More shots and more possesions is the biggest reason why. We played at one of the highest tempos in the country this season which helped inflate the entire teams offensive numbers.



  6. #6
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 63,576, Level: 78
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 1,274
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Ficklone02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City by the Bay
    Posts
    4,017
    Points
    63,576
    Level
    78
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 34
    Given: 122

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    They both deserve credit for the improvement. His shot did improve, I think somewhat due to better form/balance and partially due to increased confidence. Props to both of them.



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 48,549, Level: 68
    Level completed: 15%, Points required for next Level: 1,201
    Overall activity: 23.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    heitclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Malvern, IA
    Posts
    5,509
    Points
    48,549
    Level
    68
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 437
    Given: 533

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    Quote Originally Posted by CyJack13 View Post
    More shots and more possesions is the biggest reason why. We played at one of the highest tempos in the country this season which helped inflate the entire teams offensive numbers.
    This. Not to take anything away from DG, he definately improved but to what degree is hard to tell. Who knows what kind of numbers he could have put up last year with Gilstrap and Brackins around him in this kind of a system. He was asked to be a completely different player, and quite frankly he had to be more aggressive for this team to have any kind of a shot at sucess.



  8. #8
    Pro
    Points: 43,343, Level: 64
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 907
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Borger, TX
    Posts
    2,731
    Points
    43,343
    Level
    64
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 69
    Given: 4

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    It is coaching. You should play a style of basketball that suits your players. The fact is last years team has all the athletic tools, with Garrett, CB, Gilstrap, Dendy, and Colvin, to run and put up these numbers. The fact McD continued to roll out a giant playbook, and tell guys to stay in their 5 foot box was his decision. And the team was worse off for it.



  9. #9
    Pro
    Points: 85,653, Level: 91
    Level completed: 6%, Points required for next Level: 1,797
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Your first GroupVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    khaal53's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,616
    Points
    85,653
    Level
    91
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 182
    Given: 2

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    DG averaged 9.2 ppg last season. His scoring production jumped 8.06 ppg from last year to this year. Good enough for the 22nd biggest spike in scoring for ISU since the 1949-50 season.




    I'm on Twitter: @khaal53

  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 83,785, Level: 90
    Level completed: 2%, Points required for next Level: 1,765
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    FarminCy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Right Over There
    Posts
    2,962
    Points
    83,785
    Level
    90
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 486
    Given: 122

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    Quote Originally Posted by brett108 View Post
    It is coaching. You should play a style of basketball that suits your players. The fact is last years team has all the athletic tools, with Garrett, CB, Gilstrap, Dendy, and Colvin, to run and put up these numbers. The fact McD continued to roll out a giant playbook, and tell guys to stay in their 5 foot box was his decision. And the team was worse off for it.
    This right here.



  11. #11
    Starter
    Points: 19,518, Level: 42
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 332
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    965
    Points
    19,518
    Level
    42
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    Not so fast my friends....Which season do you think he shot a better FG & 3 Pt %?

    Oh, and he also had 24 more turnovers this season.



  12. #12
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 85,892, Level: 91
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 1,558
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,799
    Points
    85,892
    Level
    91
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 6

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    Quote Originally Posted by brett108 View Post
    It is coaching. You should play a style of basketball that suits your players. The fact is last years team has all the athletic tools, with Garrett, CB, Gilstrap, Dendy, and Colvin, to run and put up these numbers. The fact McD continued to roll out a giant playbook, and tell guys to stay in their 5 foot box was his decision. And the team was worse off for it.
    To be fair, we ran quite a bit last year until JVB got hurt, that german kid left, colvin got suspended, dendy went MIA, and Scotty got mono. Once our numbers went way down and we were limited with players, GMac slowed the pace back down.


    "Not at the table Carlos."

  13. #13
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 85,892, Level: 91
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 1,558
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,799
    Points
    85,892
    Level
    91
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 6

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    Quote Originally Posted by Cloner97 View Post
    Not so fast my friends....Which season do you think he shot a better FG & 3 Pt %?

    Oh, and he also had 24 more turnovers this season.
    He had better shooting % last season which is why I chuckle when people say he is a better shooter this year.
    He scored more points/had more turnovers this year because he was the focus of the offense, he played more minutes (25%), and he had the ball in his hands more.


    "Not at the table Carlos."

  14. #14
    Pro
    Points: 41,470, Level: 62
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 180
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    Wx4Cy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    West Des Moines
    Posts
    2,382
    Points
    41,470
    Level
    62
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3
    Given: 0

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    I think what you saw was someone recognizing another person's talents and letting him utilize them rather than forcing him to do it his way. I guess that's a big part of any leadership role, but especially coaching.



  15. #15
    Addict
    Points: 70,794, Level: 82
    Level completed: 62%, Points required for next Level: 656
    Overall activity: 32.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,903
    Points
    70,794
    Level
    82
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 488
    Given: 105

    Re: DG from 8 PPG to 17.3...

    Quote Originally Posted by brett108 View Post
    It is coaching. You should play a style of basketball that suits your players. The fact is last years team has all the athletic tools, with Garrett, CB, Gilstrap, Dendy, and Colvin, to run and put up these numbers. The fact McD continued to roll out a giant playbook, and tell guys to stay in their 5 foot box was his decision. And the team was worse off for it.
    Well to be fair to McDermott trying to run with a seven man rotation didn't produce the best results this season. A 3-13 record and finishing last or second to last in every defensive catergory was also a result of Hoiberg's coaching.

    That said, I don't have a problem with his decision. He wants to get his style implemented right away even if he won't have the players for it until next year.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • August 29, 2015
  • 06:00 PM