ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Pro
    Points: 72,425, Level: 83
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 725
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    SvrWxCy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,851
    Points
    72,425
    Level
    83
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    Another insider feature from the ESPN bracketology guru Joe Lunardi has some interesting information and an up-to-date look at how the latest games have affected the potential field for this years tournament...

    The latest information shows the Big 12 getting 7 teams into the tournament: KU, Texas, Mizzou, aTm, K-State are all solid-in at the moment, with Baylor and Oklahoma State rounding out the bubble teams that are in. A note that Oklahoma State is one of the final four at-large teams predicted in...

    The bubble teams, but out include two Big 12 teams: Nebraska (18 spots off the last-in) and Iowa State (currently 19 spots off the last-in)!


    Given what is predicted based upon the computer rankings, if we can finish 8-8 in conference we would likely be a solid bubble team for the NCAA Tourney. While it is far from an easy path, it is one that isn't too far out of reach! With this teams heart and determination, winning those that we are supposed to and pulling off at least one upset is something I think they can strive for.



  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 28,816, Level: 52
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 934
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Ankeny, IA
    Posts
    2,473
    Points
    28,816
    Level
    52
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 45
    Given: 12

    Re: ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    Tap the brakes.



  3. #3
    Legend
    Points: 146,097, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    Judoka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Timbuktu
    Posts
    11,161
    Points
    146,097
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 704
    Given: 785

    Re: ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    Let's worry about getting into the NIT this year. I'd consider that an obtainable stretch, though with an injured Scotty I am not entirely confident about that.



  4. #4
    Addict
    Points: 79,091, Level: 87
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 1,059
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    CYVADER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cornfields
    Posts
    5,231
    Points
    79,091
    Level
    87
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 11
    Given: 6

    Re: ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    let's worry about winning a conf game before going 8-8...



  5. #5
    Pro
    Points: 72,425, Level: 83
    Level completed: 58%, Points required for next Level: 725
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    SvrWxCy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    2,851
    Points
    72,425
    Level
    83
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    Sorry for the misinterpretation and hope for success...

    Notice in the original post I said "Given what is predicted based upon the computer rankings...", while I certainly agree that this needs to be take one step at at time thus far the computer's expectations for our games have done fairly well.

    I guess this is just another thread with good publicity for our team that is supposed to be in the bottom of the Big 12.



  6. #6
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 63,099, Level: 77
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 151
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Ficklone02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City by the Bay
    Posts
    3,974
    Points
    63,099
    Level
    77
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 24
    Given: 71

    Re: ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    Its pretty neat to be mentioned as a bubble team.



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 95,772, Level: 96
    Level completed: 37%, Points required for next Level: 1,278
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    xboxfever's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    6,360
    Points
    95,772
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 256
    Given: 449

    Re: ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    We are not going to the NCAA tournament. NIT is the best this team can hope for, and that would be a huge accomplishment.



  8. #8
    Addict
    Points: 97,445, Level: 97
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 1,605
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    cyclones500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    9,679
    Points
    97,445
    Level
    97
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 329
    Given: 727

    Re: ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    Quote Originally Posted by SvrWxCy View Post
    Sorry for the misinterpretation and hope for success...

    Notice in the original post I said "Given what is predicted based upon the computer rankings...", while I certainly agree that this needs to be take one step at at time thus far the computer's expectations for our games have done fairly well.

    I guess this is just another thread with good publicity for our team that is supposed to be in the bottom of the Big 12.
    I like the positive pub, for what it's worth. Seems to be a buzz around the program this season that I haven't seen since ... probably since ISU was considered a bonafide tournament contender.

    I'm sure I contradict myself from one post to another, alternating between stick-in-the-mud negative realism and hyper-optimism. I'm even at war with myself about it:

    1: Despite the uphill climb required to get to the Real Tournament, I refuse to rule out the possibility yet. Opportunity lies ahead. I think ISU is on the bracketology radar because the overall record is still OK, and the losses (a) aren't considered bad losses; (b) the conference losses were (i) a close one vs. a team on equal footing; (ii) non-blowout vs. No. 3 team that also happens to be named Kansas.

    2: Unless this team starts winning the Almost games, even an NIT bid will prove hard to attain. So far, despite promising signs of motivation in the face of limitations, they haven't achieved that.


    Bass Lake Beacon: The best in local news satire

  9. #9
    Rookie
    Points: 19,135, Level: 42
    Level completed: 21%, Points required for next Level: 715
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    406
    Points
    19,135
    Level
    42
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 40
    Given: 148

    Re: ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    I might have jumped on the 8-8 bandwagon if we had won at Neb. However I think 4-6 wins is going to hard enough.



  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 95,992, Level: 96
    Level completed: 48%, Points required for next Level: 1,058
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    ISUChippewa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,176
    Points
    95,992
    Level
    96
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 110
    Given: 188

    Re: ESPN Bracketology Math (Jan. 14)

    If Colorado keeps on playing the way they have been they will soon be in the discussion as well.


    "The fact that anybody can say anything does not mean that anything anybody says is worth hearing"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.tv
  • HOOPS: Iowa State vs. Mississippi Valley State
  • December 31, 2014
  • 06:00 PM