Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42
  1. #1
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 93,586, Level: 95
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 1,464
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    West Des Moines
    Posts
    3,954
    Points
    93,586
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Hypohetically Thinking

    I see people on here complain about the type of offense that ISU runs and it kinda got me thinking tonight after watching ISU vs Nebrasa on DVR. If you could choose what type of offense that ISU would run, what would you choose? Pass happy, run happy, slow it down, speed it up, any type of offense, what would you choose.
    Personally I think having a shotgun 2 back option kind of set would be a good offense. Fake a run up the middle with Woody or break it outside with Shontrelle. Have quick shifty receivers and run more of an uptempo kind of offense would be to my liking. What are other peoples thoughts?



  2. #2
    Addict
    Points: 211,492, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 15.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CyDude16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heads in the sky
    Posts
    9,679
    Points
    211,492
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 288
    Given: 1,089

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    I'm perfectly fine with the offense we run. I'm waiting till we have the athletes that are made to run the system though before I can hold any water to possibly change our offense.



  3. #3
    Legend
    Points: 414,010, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 22.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    cyclonedave25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14,760
    Points
    414,010
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 600
    Given: 303

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    Assuming we could run any offense and we have the needed players to run that offense, I would love for ISU to run a hurry up, lightening speed offense. Like Oregon and Oklahoma. I love watching defenses scramble and panic to get set before the offense hikes the ball.



  4. #4
    Pro
    Points: 40,805, Level: 62
    Level completed: 35%, Points required for next Level: 845
    Overall activity: 17.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,641
    Points
    40,805
    Level
    62
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    i think we will see plenty of the kid that was from ft worth that redshirted last year and i also feel robert standard will see the field a few times this coming fall....


    doc

  5. #5
    All-Star
    Points: 26,372, Level: 49
    Level completed: 83%, Points required for next Level: 178
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    Sloup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Ames, IA
    Posts
    1,188
    Points
    26,372
    Level
    49
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    Quote Originally Posted by cyclonedave25 View Post
    Assuming we could run any offense and we have the needed players to run that offense, I would love for ISU to run a hurry up, lightening speed offense. Like Oregon and Oklahoma. I love watching defenses scramble and panic to get set before the offense hikes the ball.
    Oregon's offense is studly. As I understand it, the whole idea is that they run a rather thin playbook, but they run it so fast that the defense gets confused and doesn't know what to do before the ball is snapped. I appreciate simple yet effective, so that's the kind of thing I like to see.



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 215,174, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MLawrence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    7,669
    Points
    215,174
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 386
    Given: 126

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    Quote Originally Posted by Sloup
    Oregon's offense is studly. As I understand it, the whole idea is that they run a rather thin playbook, but they run it so fast that the defense gets confused and doesn't know what to do before the ball is snapped. I appreciate simple yet effective, so that's the kind of thing I like to see.
    I run 6 plays, split veer. It's like Novocaine. Just give it time, always work.



  7. #7
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 43,797, Level: 64
    Level completed: 66%, Points required for next Level: 453
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    heitclone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Malvern, IA
    Posts
    4,683
    Points
    43,797
    Level
    64
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 137
    Given: 288

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    Quote Originally Posted by Sloup View Post
    Oregon's offense is studly. As I understand it, the whole idea is that they run a rather thin playbook, but they run it so fast that the defense gets confused and doesn't know what to do before the ball is snapped. I appreciate simple yet effective, so that's the kind of thing I like to see.
    Thats a great point, I think Oregon speeds the pace up because they know how versatile they are and so do defenses. They run a relatively small amount of plays but they all use similar looks, packages, etc... This forces the defense to play them honest. When you know exactly how defenses have to play you its going to make the playcaller/qb's job very easy. THe problem is you have to have the athletes to open things up otherwise you just get stagnant, Oregon has built their entire philosphy around the fact that it doesn't matter what the defense does because we have more speed and better athletes. Michigan is an example of this backfiring, when they were in the non conference they had the hands down lock to win the heisman and basically ran 3 or 4 plays. They had a couple read options with Robinson and threw bubble screens to their slots all day when teams tried to stack the box. This worked great....until they ran in to big 10 teams who weren't inferior athletically and had the ability to stop the read option and the screens wihtout gambling and leaving themselves vulnerable. Another great example of this is the Texas/Nebby game. Texas used a super simple gameplan, just let our superior athletes keep Tmart in front of them, nothing cute, nothing complicated...speed checks speed.



  8. #8
    Pro
    Points: 62,012, Level: 77
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 1,238
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points
    besserheimerphat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Mount Vernon, WA
    Posts
    2,687
    Points
    62,012
    Level
    77
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 132
    Given: 231

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    Quote Originally Posted by Sloup View Post
    As I understand it, the whole idea is that they run a rather thin playbook, but they run it so fast that the defense gets confused and doesn't know what to do before the ball is snapped. I appreciate simple yet effective, so that's the kind of thing I like to see.
    Mike Leach's Texas Tech teams did something like this as well. They only had about 15 plays, but they ran them out of 30 formations. Leach said that doing it that way means your offense only needs to know 15 plays, but the defense has to know 450. Each receiver may only have to run 4 - 5 routes, but he'll run it from 8 - 10 different places along the line of scrimmage.


    You can spend a lot of time and money picking out the perfect floral bouquet for your date ... but you're probably better off checking if you have bad breath and taking the porn out of the glove compartment.

    The moral: you gain more by not being stupid, than you do by being smart. Smart gets neutralized by other smart people. Stupid does not.

  9. #9
    Addict
    Points: 177,730, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    snowcraig2.0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Posts
    7,423
    Points
    177,730
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 460
    Given: 76

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    I hope to see us in the pistol with two backs behind whoever is at quarterback.



  10. #10
    Addict
    Points: 105,440, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    CyForPresident's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Cornlands of Ayuxwa
    Posts
    5,425
    Points
    105,440
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 35
    Given: 5

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    I run three plays. Bone right belly right. Bone Left belly left. And Bone right belly left.

    Seriously though, Mike Leech's offense.



  11. #11
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 66,895, Level: 80
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 1,155
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    RustShack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Adventureland
    Posts
    4,754
    Points
    66,895
    Level
    80
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 169
    Given: 0

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    The only problem with ISU's offense is we don't pass enough. We should have stuck with a Pro Style and kept adding some spread elements more and more each year until we got the players to properly run it. I feel like since our WR's weren't getting it done last year, we should have stuck with the Pro Style and that should have helped the running game a little more. It might not have made THAT big of a difference, but I think we have some quality spread players for next year. They are young though, but we should be seeing some real improvement the next few years.



  12. #12
    Addict
    Points: 84,629, Level: 90
    Level completed: 49%, Points required for next Level: 921
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    ripvdub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sk-Ankeny
    Posts
    6,825
    Points
    84,629
    Level
    90
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 60
    Given: 185

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    Pass more, run less.


    #BEATIOWA

  13. #13
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 35,111, Level: 57
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 339
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    fccy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Forest City
    Posts
    3,589
    Points
    35,111
    Level
    57
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 29
    Given: 497

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    Quote Originally Posted by CyDude16 View Post
    I'm perfectly fine with the offense we run. I'm waiting till we have the athletes that are made to run the system though before I can hold any water to possibly change our offense.
    This. People forget that CPR/TH did not recruit AA or Tiller.

    Of course, there is one truism: it does not matter what offense (or defense) you run; once you have "your" players in place, they still need to produce.



  14. #14
    Walk On
    Points: 6,071, Level: 23
    Level completed: 5%, Points required for next Level: 479
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    133
    Points
    6,071
    Level
    23
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    Quote Originally Posted by heitclone View Post
    Oregon has built their entire philosphy around the fact that it doesn't matter what the defense does because we have more speed and better athletes. Michigan is an example of this backfiring, when they were in the non conference they had the hands down lock to win the heisman and basically ran 3 or 4 plays. They had a couple read options with Robinson and threw bubble screens to their slots all day when teams tried to stack the box. This worked great....until they ran in to big 10 teams who weren't inferior athletically and had the ability to stop the read option and the screens wihtout gambling and leaving themselves vulnerable.
    I don't know that I'd say it "backfired" at Michigan. Before the last game vs. Ohio State, Michigan average 41 ppg in the non-conference and 34 ppg in conference. They were still able to do a lot of the things they did in the early season, but their defense too often resembled a sieve and couldn't get any stops to translate into W's.

    I'm a Hawk fan, so I don't know how it applies to this thread, but I like watching Leach's style, RichRod's style, and pre-Tebow Florida when they were wide open, 5 wide so often.



  15. #15
    Rookie
    Points: 26,515, Level: 49
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 35
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    berther48's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Sioux City, Iowa
    Posts
    355
    Points
    26,515
    Level
    49
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 59
    Given: 192

    Re: Hypohetically Thinking

    Quote Originally Posted by zwclones51 View Post
    I see people on here complain about the type of offense that ISU runs and it kinda got me thinking tonight after watching ISU vs Nebrasa on DVR. If you could choose what type of offense that ISU would run, what would you choose? Pass happy, run happy, slow it down, speed it up, any type of offense, what would you choose.
    Personally I think having a shotgun 2 back option kind of set would be a good offense. Fake a run up the middle with Woody or break it outside with Shontrelle. Have quick shifty receivers and run more of an uptempo kind of offense would be to my liking. What are other peoples thoughts?
    I agree, I think we need a Pro set in the shot gun, two backs with the Qb.
    Run the belly read with Woody and have the option available with Shontrelle.
    It also gives us better pass protection, you could use a TE with Woody or Shontrelle, use them to check for blitzing Lbers then flare out, or curl for safety valve, middle screen type play.
    Use the TE to short side as extra blocker and do a "Mary had a little lamb" slow release on DE or backer and run a delay flat route.

    Heck I'd even accept a Oklahoma Diamond look with short motion out or across the formation, I also like the Diamond backfield with an unbalanced line run power off and middle trap series.

    Just need an extra man back there for MAXIUM pass defense.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 07:00 PM