Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 94
  1. #1
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    41
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Both are optimistic, high-energy guys. McCarney had some success, but not on a consistent basis. Will Rhoads be more consistent than McCarney? And if so, why?

    I was a big fan of McCarney, but he kept breaking my heart (2004 and 2005). So after last season's success, I tried to keep my enthusiasm under wraps. Does Rhoads have some quality lacking in McCarney that gives us additional hope for the future?



  2. #2
    Addict
    Points: 154,874, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    weR138's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,525
    Points
    154,874
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 112
    Given: 32

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Quote Originally Posted by CycloneCurt View Post
    Both are optimistic, high-energy guys. McCarney had some success, but not on a consistent basis. Will Rhoads be more consistent than McCarney? And if so, why?

    I was a big fan of McCarney, but he kept breaking my heart (2004 and 2005). So after last season's success, I tried to keep my enthusiasm under wraps. Does Rhoads have some quality lacking in McCarney that gives us additional hope for the future?
    I've noticed two things;

    1. There is a limit to PR's "nice guy", he's less nice than DMC more often

    2. It's obvious that PR has a better eye for coordinators and assistants

    Mac was good for ISU; CPR is better and will prove it (imo he already has)


    RIP Janice
    b. April 2012 d. April 2012
    9 posts
    May perpetual light shine upon him.

  3. #3
    Addict
    Points: 173,978, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    RayShimley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Montreal, QC
    Posts
    6,039
    Points
    173,978
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 73
    Given: 29

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Quote Originally Posted by weR138 View Post
    I've noticed two things;

    1. There is a limit to PR's "nice guy", he's less nice than DMC more often

    2. It's obvious that PR has a better eye for coordinators and assistants

    Mac was good for ISU; CPR is better and will prove it (imo he already has)
    Wait a second, wasn't CPR one of DMC's assistants?!? What are you trying to say?!?!



  4. #4
    Starter
    Points: 23,955, Level: 47
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 595
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience PointsSocial
    MadCy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Madison, WI
    Posts
    790
    Points
    23,955
    Level
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 3
    Given: 22

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Quote Originally Posted by CycloneCurt View Post
    Both are optimistic, high-energy guys. McCarney had some success, but not on a consistent basis. Will Rhoads be more consistent than McCarney? And if so, why?

    I was a big fan of McCarney, but he kept breaking my heart (2004 and 2005). So after last season's success, I tried to keep my enthusiasm under wraps. Does Rhoads have some quality lacking in McCarney that gives us additional hope for the future?
    I think CPR will have more success in a W-L sense than Mac did. It's a hard comparison to make however if you're looking at it in a "big picture" sense. Even though we were 3-9, 2-10, and I think 4-8 the years before CPR arrived, the program still had a lot more going for it than it did when Mac took over.



  5. #5
    Addict
    Points: 154,874, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    weR138's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,525
    Points
    154,874
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 112
    Given: 32

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Quote Originally Posted by RayShimley View Post
    Wait a second, wasn't CPR one of DMC's assistants?!? What are you trying to say?!?!
    Rep (gotta spread it around)


    RIP Janice
    b. April 2012 d. April 2012
    9 posts
    May perpetual light shine upon him.

  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 100,625, Level: 98
    Level completed: 79%, Points required for next Level: 425
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    cyrocksmypants's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Honolulu, HI
    Posts
    7,905
    Points
    100,625
    Level
    98
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,603
    Given: 88

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    I'd say the consistency so far is that Rhoads has won the games we're supposed to win and lost games we were supposed to lose, with some upsets sprinkled in. I think the winning the games we're supposed to win is the big key. Too many time Mac lost to inferior teams and didn't have many upsets to balance it out. If Rhoads continues to win the games we're supposed to win, eventually we'll get good enough that there will be more and more games we're supposed to win every year, and if we keep winning those "should win" games, our win total will increase. Does that make sense at all? It does in my head, but after re-reading, it may confuse people.



  7. #7
    Addict
    Points: 154,874, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    weR138's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    7,525
    Points
    154,874
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 112
    Given: 32

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Quote Originally Posted by MadCy View Post
    I think CPR will have more success in a W-L sense than Mac did. It's a hard comparison to make however if you're looking at it in a "big picture" sense. Even though we were 3-9, 2-10, and I think 4-8 the years before CPR arrived, the program still had a lot more going for it than it did when Mac took over.
    I agree to a point but the notion that DMC started at zero is false. Now Walden, starting after Duncan and Criner that was less than zero.


    RIP Janice
    b. April 2012 d. April 2012
    9 posts
    May perpetual light shine upon him.

  8. #8
    Pro
    Points: 39,415, Level: 61
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 935
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    2,647
    Points
    39,415
    Level
    61
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 21
    Given: 9

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Mac responded to every question with, "No doubt about it..."



  9. #9
    Pro
    Points: 42,021, Level: 63
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 929
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Cyrocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,102
    Points
    42,021
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 43
    Given: 14

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Quote Originally Posted by CycloneCurt View Post
    Both are optimistic, high-energy guys. McCarney had some success, but not on a consistent basis. Will Rhoads be more consistent than McCarney? And if so, why?

    I was a big fan of McCarney, but he kept breaking my heart (2004 and 2005). So after last season's success, I tried to keep my enthusiasm under wraps. Does Rhoads have some quality lacking in McCarney that gives us additional hope for the future?
    Too early to tell, in my opinion (but I do like the direction this program is heading).

    The one team a Rhoads' coached team should have beat both years is Kansas State.

    I think the same thing can be said for KU last year. Hopefully the Cyclones can remedy that situation this year.

    But so far, I think Rhoads has built some credibility points in winning the games ISU is supposed to, and coming up with at least one upset each year.

    McCarney's teams, bless them, were pretty schizophrenic. For example, they would beat Iowa, but then lose the next week to an inferior opponent the next. Hopefully Rhoads' team this year won't spoil a huge Texas win with a loss to Kansas.

    Also, McCarney's teams had, unfortunately, the unique ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, i.e., the Mizzou and Kansas games that would have given ISU the Big 12 North title.


    Last edited by Cyrocks; 10-29-2010 at 09:46 AM.

  10. #10
    Pro
    Points: 39,415, Level: 61
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 935
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    25000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Des Moines
    Posts
    2,647
    Points
    39,415
    Level
    61
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 21
    Given: 9

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Quote Originally Posted by MadCy View Post
    I think CPR will have more success in a W-L sense than Mac did. It's a hard comparison to make however if you're looking at it in a "big picture" sense. Even though we were 3-9, 2-10, and I think 4-8 the years before CPR arrived, the program still had a lot more going for it than it did when Mac took over.
    I agree the Chiz did leave CPR with more players than the other guy named Jim left Mac.



  11. #11
    Pro
    Points: 42,021, Level: 63
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 929
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Cyrocks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    3,102
    Points
    42,021
    Level
    63
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 43
    Given: 14

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Quote Originally Posted by weR138 View Post
    I agree to a point but the notion that DMC started at zero is false. Now Walden, starting after Duncan and Criner that was less than zero.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cyforce View Post
    I agree the Chiz did leave CPR with more players than the other guy named Jim left Mac.
    And I would agree with weR138 that Walden left Mac more players than what Criner and Duncan left for Walden (namely less scholarship players for breaking an NCAA rule).



  12. #12
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 59,308, Level: 75
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 742
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Kyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,075
    Points
    59,308
    Level
    75
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyrocks View Post
    Too early to tell, in my opinion (but I do like the direction this program is heading).
    This.


    Seneca Wallace.

  13. #13
    Speechless
    Points: 272,848, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    isuno1fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Clive, Iowa
    Posts
    17,514
    Points
    272,848
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 159
    Given: 31

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    One deserves to be a head coach and one does not.



  14. #14
    Addict
    Points: 94,276, Level: 95
    Level completed: 60%, Points required for next Level: 774
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience Points
    Frak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Dow City, IA
    Posts
    5,709
    Points
    94,276
    Level
    95
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 143
    Given: 60

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    I see some differences even though they are more the same than different. Both are motivators, both are emotional. But, I think that Rhoads has more of a strategy behind him. He's smarter. He put more thought into his assistant hires. He definitely puts more thought into his recruiting decisions. I just think that there's a lot more planning going on with this staff.



  15. #15
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 38,576, Level: 60
    Level completed: 61%, Points required for next Level: 474
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    Created Album picturesVeteran25000 Experience Points
    ThatllDoCy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    3,627
    Points
    38,576
    Level
    60
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 260
    Given: 361

    Re: Comparing McCarney and Rhoads

    I love DMac, and he built this program up from almost nothing. He is a passionate Coach. What I think that Paul brings to the table is that passion with a bit more focus and perspective. Paul has been around the country and built a great reputation. He is able to attract great Coaches here. DMac was at Wisconsin and was in the Fry lineage of Coaches. Paul has been in the Big East and SEC where he had success and got to observe a ton. This I think helps him see past the short sightedness of ISU's detractors, and keep the eye on the prize.

    As far as gameday, he is a much better Coach IMO. I am not going to say anything negative about Dan though. I think Paul is a very good Gameday Coach. Knows when to gamble.


    “Man suffers only because he takes seriously what the gods made for fun.”
    Alan Wilson Watts

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: FS1
  • Iowa State vs. Oklahoma
  • November 1, 2014
  • 11:00 AM