Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 28,175, Level: 51
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 475
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    1,844
    Points
    28,175
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.



    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Accept the truth

  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 33,533, Level: 56
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 717
    Overall activity: 23.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,216
    Points
    33,533
    Level
    56
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 57
    Given: 30

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    they look slow and don't have clue...LJ is a let down



  3. #3
    All-Star
    Points: 21,317, Level: 44
    Level completed: 63%, Points required for next Level: 333
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    1,627
    Points
    21,317
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 0

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.



  4. #4
    Legend
    Points: 404,053, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    cyclonedave25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14,501
    Points
    404,053
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 386
    Given: 191

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    A QB with all day to throw will make any secondary look like crap. You cannot expect a CB to cover a WR for 8 seconds.


    When Prepared, Fear No One.

  5. #5
    Walk On
    Points: 10,926, Level: 31
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 324
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    140
    Points
    10,926
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    To much time to throw. 1 starter out and 1 with broken hand whose playing.



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 126,828, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    tim_redd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    7,368
    Points
    126,828
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 100
    Given: 41

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    hard to stop a guy when he runs 60 yards to get open



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 356,117, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    18,943
    Points
    356,117
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 322
    Given: 42

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You could give me 7 seconds to pick any secondary apart and I could probably do it. I want to see a secondary that looks good with no pressure. There isn't one.


    I'm on Twitter too: Tre4ISU

    Or so I have read.

  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 432,830, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    23,817
    Points
    432,830
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 122
    Given: 16

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    We've pressured Stanzi once, and it lead to a sack, otherwise he's had all month to throw.



  9. #9
    All-Star
    Points: 27,644, Level: 51
    Level completed: 9%, Points required for next Level: 1,006
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    ahaselhu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Boone, IA
    Posts
    1,775
    Points
    27,644
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2
    Given: 22

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    Quote Originally Posted by deadeyededric View Post
    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.
    I disagree. It isn't a too much time to throw problem, its a coverage problem. For the most part, Stanzi hasn't had to hang on to the ball too long.



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 394,167, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 88.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    57,766
    Points
    394,167
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 404
    Given: 293

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    They were good last week.
    We are playing the national champions this week.


    CFH HMagic bball season next year.
    Let my Fred's Four Horsemen ride: Georges, Hogue, Nader, and McKay.

  11. #11
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    lots of offensive 2nd team players need to be switched to defense in order to save this season



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 11:00 AM