Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 28,175, Level: 51
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 475
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    1,844
    Points
    28,175
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.



    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Accept the truth

  2. #2
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 38,077, Level: 60
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 973
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,681
    Points
    38,077
    Level
    60
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 212
    Given: 110

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    they look slow and don't have clue...LJ is a let down



  3. #3
    Pro
    Points: 23,451, Level: 46
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 99
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    2,033
    Points
    23,451
    Level
    46
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 118
    Given: 221

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.



  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 231,209, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    cyclonedave25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    15,959
    Points
    231,209
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,609
    Given: 865

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    A QB with all day to throw will make any secondary look like crap. You cannot expect a CB to cover a WR for 8 seconds.


    When Prepared, Fear No One.

  5. #5
    Walk On
    Points: 11,659, Level: 32
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 291
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    168
    Points
    11,659
    Level
    32
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 12
    Given: 10

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    To much time to throw. 1 starter out and 1 with broken hand whose playing.



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 128,269, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    tim_redd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    7,769
    Points
    128,269
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 342
    Given: 192

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    hard to stop a guy when he runs 60 yards to get open



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 352,897, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    20,443
    Points
    352,897
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,210
    Given: 149

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You could give me 7 seconds to pick any secondary apart and I could probably do it. I want to see a secondary that looks good with no pressure. There isn't one.


    It's all snark from here on out

  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 444,799, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    24,275
    Points
    444,799
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 467
    Given: 84

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    We've pressured Stanzi once, and it lead to a sack, otherwise he's had all month to throw.



  9. #9
    All-Star
    Points: 28,551, Level: 51
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 99
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    ahaselhu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Boone, IA
    Posts
    1,839
    Points
    28,551
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 34
    Given: 88

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    Quote Originally Posted by deadeyededric View Post
    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.
    I disagree. It isn't a too much time to throw problem, its a coverage problem. For the most part, Stanzi hasn't had to hang on to the ball too long.



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 433,791, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 44.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    64,949
    Points
    433,791
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,478
    Given: 1,116

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    They were good last week.
    We are playing the national champions this week.


    Let Prohm's Posse Ride: Georges, Georgios, 3sus, Hallice, Deonte, Dustin, Abdel, Monte, Matt, and McKaT.

  11. #11
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    lots of offensive 2nd team players need to be switched to defense in order to save this season



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: Cyclones.TV
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • September 5, 2015
  • 07:00 PM