Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 28,175, Level: 51
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 475
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    1,844
    Points
    28,175
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.



    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Accept the truth

  2. #2
    Pro
    Points: 32,923, Level: 55
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 127
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,195
    Points
    32,923
    Level
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 56
    Given: 25

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    they look slow and don't have clue...LJ is a let down



  3. #3
    All-Star
    Points: 21,226, Level: 44
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 424
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    1,625
    Points
    21,226
    Level
    44
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.



  4. #4
    Legend
    Points: 403,757, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    cyclonedave25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    14,460
    Points
    403,757
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 318
    Given: 162

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    A QB with all day to throw will make any secondary look like crap. You cannot expect a CB to cover a WR for 8 seconds.


    When Prepared, Fear No One.

  5. #5
    Walk On
    Points: 10,869, Level: 31
    Level completed: 46%, Points required for next Level: 381
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    140
    Points
    10,869
    Level
    31
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    To much time to throw. 1 starter out and 1 with broken hand whose playing.



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 126,739, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    tim_redd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    7,361
    Points
    126,739
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 96
    Given: 41

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    hard to stop a guy when he runs 60 yards to get open



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 355,814, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 16.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    18,896
    Points
    355,814
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 295
    Given: 38

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You could give me 7 seconds to pick any secondary apart and I could probably do it. I want to see a secondary that looks good with no pressure. There isn't one.


    I'm on Twitter too: Tre4ISU

    Or so I have read.

  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 431,685, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    23,786
    Points
    431,685
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 104
    Given: 15

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    We've pressured Stanzi once, and it lead to a sack, otherwise he's had all month to throw.



  9. #9
    All-Star
    Points: 27,530, Level: 50
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 20
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    ahaselhu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Boone, IA
    Posts
    1,773
    Points
    27,530
    Level
    50
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 18

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    Quote Originally Posted by deadeyededric View Post
    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.
    I disagree. It isn't a too much time to throw problem, its a coverage problem. For the most part, Stanzi hasn't had to hang on to the ball too long.



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 391,210, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 95.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    57,079
    Points
    391,210
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 310
    Given: 257

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    They were good last week.
    We are playing the national champions this week.


    CFH HMagic bball season next year.
    Let my Fred's Four Horsemen ride: Georges, Hogue, Nader, and McKay.

  11. #11
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    lots of offensive 2nd team players need to be switched to defense in order to save this season



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • Football
  • Iowa State vs. North Dakota State
  • August 30, 2014
  • 11:00 AM