Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 28,175, Level: 51
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 475
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    1,844
    Points
    28,175
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.



    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Accept the truth

  2. #2
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 44,051, Level: 64
    Level completed: 85%, Points required for next Level: 199
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    4,047
    Points
    44,051
    Level
    64
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 378
    Given: 168

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    they look slow and don't have clue...LJ is a let down



  3. #3
    Pro
    Points: 24,052, Level: 47
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 498
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    2,054
    Points
    24,052
    Level
    47
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 122
    Given: 291

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.



  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 239,443, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 11.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    cyclonedave25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    16,870
    Points
    239,443
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,662
    Given: 1,527

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    A QB with all day to throw will make any secondary look like crap. You cannot expect a CB to cover a WR for 8 seconds.


    When Prepared, Fear No One.

  5. #5
    Walk On
    Points: 12,035, Level: 33
    Level completed: 13%, Points required for next Level: 615
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    181
    Points
    12,035
    Level
    33
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 20
    Given: 12

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    To much time to throw. 1 starter out and 1 with broken hand whose playing.



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 129,551, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    tim_redd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    8,030
    Points
    129,551
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 456
    Given: 308

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    hard to stop a guy when he runs 60 yards to get open



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 366,412, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 23.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    21,531
    Points
    366,412
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,854
    Given: 202

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You could give me 7 seconds to pick any secondary apart and I could probably do it. I want to see a secondary that looks good with no pressure. There isn't one.


    It's all snark from here on out

  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 449,256, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 6.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Rochester, MN
    Posts
    24,685
    Points
    449,256
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 658
    Given: 225

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    We've pressured Stanzi once, and it lead to a sack, otherwise he's had all month to throw.



  9. #9
    All-Star
    Points: 29,135, Level: 52
    Level completed: 45%, Points required for next Level: 615
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    ahaselhu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Boone, IA
    Posts
    1,874
    Points
    29,135
    Level
    52
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 63
    Given: 156

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    Quote Originally Posted by deadeyededric View Post
    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.
    I disagree. It isn't a too much time to throw problem, its a coverage problem. For the most part, Stanzi hasn't had to hang on to the ball too long.



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 458,755, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    69,783
    Points
    458,755
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 2,184
    Given: 1,945

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    They were good last week.
    We are playing the national champions this week.


    Let Prohm's Posse Ride: Georges, Georgios, 3sus, Hallice, Deonte, Abdel, Monte, Matt, and McKaT.

  11. #11
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    lots of offensive 2nd team players need to be switched to defense in order to save this season



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: ESPNU
  • HOOPS: Iowa State @ Texas Tech
  • February 10, 2016
  • 08:00 PM