Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    All-Star
    Points: 28,175, Level: 51
    Level completed: 57%, Points required for next Level: 475
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    homeless
    Posts
    1,844
    Points
    28,175
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1
    Given: 0

    I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.



    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Accept the truth

  2. #2
    Hall-Of-Famer
    Points: 37,688, Level: 59
    Level completed: 87%, Points required for next Level: 162
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,643
    Points
    37,688
    Level
    59
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 199
    Given: 102

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    they look slow and don't have clue...LJ is a let down



  3. #3
    All-Star
    Points: 23,222, Level: 46
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 328
    Overall activity: 18.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    1,990
    Points
    23,222
    Level
    46
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 105
    Given: 193

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.



  4. #4
    Speechless
    Points: 227,723, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 29.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    cyclonedave25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    15,789
    Points
    227,723
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,381
    Given: 708

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    A QB with all day to throw will make any secondary look like crap. You cannot expect a CB to cover a WR for 8 seconds.


    When Prepared, Fear No One.

  5. #5
    Walk On
    Points: 11,551, Level: 32
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 399
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    162
    Points
    11,551
    Level
    32
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 6
    Given: 7

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    To much time to throw. 1 starter out and 1 with broken hand whose playing.



  6. #6
    Addict
    Points: 128,076, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 14.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    tim_redd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ankeny
    Posts
    7,739
    Points
    128,076
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 327
    Given: 183

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    hard to stop a guy when he runs 60 yards to get open



  7. #7
    Speechless
    Points: 351,874, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 35.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialYour first GroupRecommendation Second ClassVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Tre4ISU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Estherville
    Posts
    20,270
    Points
    351,874
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,041
    Given: 139

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    You could give me 7 seconds to pick any secondary apart and I could probably do it. I want to see a secondary that looks good with no pressure. There isn't one.


    It's all snark from here on out

  8. #8
    Speechless
    Points: 442,879, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 4.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassVeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Ames
    Posts
    24,216
    Points
    442,879
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 425
    Given: 55

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    We've pressured Stanzi once, and it lead to a sack, otherwise he's had all month to throw.



  9. #9
    All-Star
    Points: 28,551, Level: 51
    Level completed: 91%, Points required for next Level: 99
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    ahaselhu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Boone, IA
    Posts
    1,839
    Points
    28,551
    Level
    51
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 34
    Given: 88

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    Quote Originally Posted by deadeyededric View Post
    You can't cover somebody for 4 and 5 seconds. Somebody has to get to the qb.
    I disagree. It isn't a too much time to throw problem, its a coverage problem. For the most part, Stanzi hasn't had to hang on to the ball too long.



  10. #10
    Speechless
    Points: 429,621, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialOverdriveVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Wesley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Omaha
    Posts
    64,398
    Points
    429,621
    Level
    100
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 1,356
    Given: 1,009

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    They were good last week.
    We are playing the national champions this week.


    Let my Fred's Posse Ride: Georges, 3sus, Hallice, Deonte, Dustin, Abdel, Monte, Matt, and McKaT.

  11. #11
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    55
    Thumbs Up
    Received: 0
    Given: 0

    Re: I thought ISU's secondary was suppose to be good.

    lots of offensive 2nd team players need to be switched to defense in order to save this season



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
  • TV: TBD
  • FOOTBALL: Iowa State vs. UNI
  • August 29, 2015
  • 06:00 PM