Tennessee just fumbled the ball into the endzone and GA gets the ball as a touchback. They mentioned the Texas game. How was that second fumble not a touchback?
Tennessee just fumbled the ball into the endzone and GA gets the ball as a touchback. They mentioned the Texas game. How was that second fumble not a touchback?
I thought it was a touchback if the ball was fumbled across the goal line and out of bounds.
Because the Texas player recovered it. It's only a touchback if it goes out of bounds.
If you don't make that the rule then how would you spot the ball after a fumble out of the end zone?I've always thought this rule was the most unfair rule in football. Such a huge difference between fumbling out of bounds at the 1 versus past the pylon in the end zone.
If you don't make that the rule then how would you spot the ball after a fumble out of the end zone?
I guess I've always liked the rule but I can see where others wouldn't.
I do remember that now that you bring it up. Coleman fumble on the 1 right?I started hating the rule when it cost us that game against Baylor. Gave Baylor their first conference road win ever.
I do remember that now that you bring it up. Coleman fumble on the 1 right?
Yes, I think that was it. I keep trying to forget all the kicks in the gonads during 05. still can't shake some of those plays.
Pretty sure Baylor recovered the fumble in the end zone on that one, which triggered the touch back. If I remember right, Coleman's fumble happened right around the right side hash mark going toward the north end zone.
would you rather lose how we did or how Tennessee did?
Nowould you rather lose how we did or how Tennessee did?